Steeplejack;
If what you're talking about is a hypothetical nationalism that might exist in some perfect future, somewhere over the rainbow, then it's difficult to continue (and in any case, I really need to do some work). All of these things may come to pass, but history shows that however you define self/other relationships in politics, social tensions tend to create friction along these more or less arbitrary fault lines - and elite groups always tend to capitalise on internal divisions within groups that should have a natural affinity (like social classes) to cement their rule.
It also seems to me that a nation without the accoutrements of nationhood and which is fully devolved as much as practicable is hardly a nation at all in the sense that we have them today, so maybe the thing that you are proposing and the thing that I want to see consigned to the dustbin of history aren't the same thing at all.
If what you're talking about is a hypothetical nationalism that might exist in some perfect future, somewhere over the rainbow, then it's difficult to continue (and in any case, I really need to do some work). All of these things may come to pass, but history shows that however you define self/other relationships in politics, social tensions tend to create friction along these more or less arbitrary fault lines - and elite groups always tend to capitalise on internal divisions within groups that should have a natural affinity (like social classes) to cement their rule.
It also seems to me that a nation without the accoutrements of nationhood and which is fully devolved as much as practicable is hardly a nation at all in the sense that we have them today, so maybe the thing that you are proposing and the thing that I want to see consigned to the dustbin of history aren't the same thing at all.




sorry