Blagsta said:Errr...so getting ripped off and encouraging anti-social behaviour doesn't bother you?
Of course getting ripped off bothers me, so I make sure I don't. As for anti-social behaviour, it's just a sane reaction to an unstoned world.
Blagsta said:Errr...so getting ripped off and encouraging anti-social behaviour doesn't bother you?
Pie 1 said:You actually managed to get stoned off stuff you bought on the high street? That's probably a first.
Thankfully I have a regular indoors dealer now. Dopermine said:Nothing's the matter with me. I want drugs, bloke offers me drugs, I buy em, smoke em, am happy. What part of the word STONED don't you understand?

ViolentPanda said:You must have odd brain chemistry to get stoned off the dealer's mum's homemade basil and oregano mix.![]()
![]()
scotlander said:Street dealing is not good anywhere but the problem will only be solved by decreasing demand or an alternative supply.
Dinner party fare? Are you taking the piss and/or trying to come the class angle?Dopermine said:These are street guys, I can't imagine their mothers preparing such exquisite dinner party fare.
Probably not as explosively as mine would blow her head off.Still, I bet her jerk chicken mix would blow your head off.

ViolentPanda said:homemade pizza
TopCat said:People like to smoke dope, including many moaning here. Education campaigns, name and shame policies, police enforcement, draconian penalities have all been tried and have all failed...
Dopermine said:Scrumptious!

TopCat said:People like to smoke dope, including many moaning here. Education campaigns, name and shame policies, police enforcement, draconian penalities have all been tried and have all failed...
gabi said:however if u embarrass the claphamites or whoever the fucking idiots are you see actually buying the stuff on the st then they will stop coming. dont want mummy and daddy to see your face in a full page ad in the metro do they.
which will hopefully lead to the whistling cunts at the bus-stops fucking off too. altho i guess that aint ever gonna change in reality.
gabi said:which will hopefully lead to the whistling cunts at the bus-stops fucking off too. altho i guess that aint ever gonna change in reality.

TopCat said:You poor shy flower you. Imagine nasty men whistling near you or saying skunk skunk. Please don't ever go down the market, I dunno how you would cope with people shouting apples and pears near you.![]()
detective-boy said:Yes. Provided it is accurate and true. But it must also comply with the Human Rights Act which means that the breach of the individuals privacy must be proportionate, legal, accountable and necessary when balanced against the problem being addressed.
But, broadly speaking, yes, it is legal if done properly.
And the "attack" on the customer base (especially the travelling one) is a deliberate additional tactic, not in place of harassing the dealers (the principle being (as with prostitution and kerb crawlers) that if you remove the dealer but the market remains, they will be instantly replaced by others whereas if you remove the market then the dealers will disappear too.

You could ask the same question on a larger scale: "If I had a load of people who could go and sit in every Magistrates and Crown Court in the country, taking note of all the convictions (and the previous convictions often read out before sentence) which take place (which are all in open court even in the very few cases where some of the evidence is in camera), how come criminal records are not publicly accessible?MadFish said:Not doubting you - in fact I know this to be true. What I can't get my head around though is if I were to walk into a police station and ask details of someone who had previously been convicted of something I'd be told they couldn't tell me anything due to the Data Protection Act. Fair enough, except how come they can then publish those same details in the local paper for all to see?![]()
detective-boy said:(I personally think that (unspent) criminal records should be a matter of public record - we have huge problems in all sorts of areas with vetting being part of the issue - the private sector (including most security) cannot as a matter of course check whether someone is lying about their record. Yes, there are issues of stigma but they apply to nyone telling the truth on their application form anyway - why penalise them as opposed to the liars??)


