Iam said:If you're suggesting that because you enjoy something once, you have to enjoy it forevermore, that's bollocks, too.
![]()
Cheesypoof said:yeh but to go from loving it and it changing your life a bit when you are 14, and then turning around at 26 and 'realising its shit' just sounds like you were following whats popular as a kid (or an adult) if you ask me.
it kind of makes me sad too, that something that could affect your life at 13 would be just considered 'shit' when you got older. I just dont get firkys reasoning because the things i loved as a teenager i still happen to love 15 years later, whether it be music, films or whatever.
Cheesypoof said:yeh but to go from loving it and it changing your life a bit when you are 14, and then turning around at 26 and 'realising its shit' just sounds like you were following whats popular as a kid (or an adult) if you ask me.
it kind of makes me sad too, that something that could affect your life at 13 would be just considered 'shit' when you got older. I just dont get firkys reasoning because the things i loved as a teenager i still happen to love 15 years later, whether it be music, films or whatever.

Negativland said:Yeh, the thing on the Doors thread seemed to be about saying your music experience as a 14yo is more authentic and direct than as an adult, and if you revise yr opinion you are betraying the pure experience. Loada crap obviously.
This thing about not caring about cool I don't agree with though. No-one is exempt from fashion. People who say they don't care how they present themselves often say this precisely as a fashion statement. It's not wrong to reject something because it doesn't fit into your notion of cool!

firky said:Some of us follow doherty around but that's OK because we're being ironic to something iconic - not fashionable, or cool, no sir! I'm so uncool and cool i am mobius loop!![]()
Cheesypoof said:where do you get all this paranoia about people liking stuff to be popular or thinking stuff based on anyone else or what they think?

