littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
I'd go for the woolly liberals out of that lot. It's not a disgustingly narrow choice.Spoilt for choice.

I'd go for the woolly liberals out of that lot. It's not a disgustingly narrow choice.Spoilt for choice.

That's like looking through the Freeview and terrestrial listings and opting for a repeat of Dragon's Den on Dave because it's not quite as bad as anything else that's on. Turn the TV off and do something else.I'd go for the woolly liberals out of that lot. It's not a disgustingly narrow choice.![]()

Given the above choice, I think I might vote. Inasmuch as voting makes any difference at all, adding to a strong showing for a bunch of woolly liberals against an assortment of neo-liberal wankers might make the appearance of a credible socialist alternative in the future a tiny bit more likely.That's like looking through the Freeview and terrestrial listings and opting for a repeat of Dragon's Den on Dave because it's not quite as bad as anything else that's on. Turn the TV off and do something else.
![]()
What constituency are you in?
Ah. £25k for a second home, even though he lives in London.Sadly I'm in the constituency of that careerist NL wanker David Lammy.
Ah. £25k for a second home, even though he lives in London.
Will you be voting Lib Dem to oust him?
Even though it's the plot from a classic Richard Pryor film ... maybe it's time there was a proper "None of the above" campaign ...
http://www.noneoftheaboveparty.org.uk/
Interestingly, if you click this link and search for the word "none" you'll find that "none of the above" is the one and only banned expression when registering a political party. Says quite alot really.
It says that smug tossers who want to vote 'none of the above' are wankers of the highest order.
If you want to vote, then vote. If you dont, then dont. And if you are that bothered by the lack of choice then make the effort and stand yourself.
It's not about being smug, it's about registering your disdain for the political system. The trouble is people who don't vote are viewed as apathetic, a none of the above option will dispel that notion. Do feel free to carry on with your assumptions and abuse though.
It says that smug tossers who want to vote 'none of the above' are wankers of the highest order.
If you want to vote, then vote. If you dont, then dont. And if you are that bothered by the lack of choice then make the effort and stand yourself.
Even people who go and vote BNP are worthy of more consideration in the political process.
Steady on, that's booking yourself a place on the List*
*you were on it anyway I'm afraid

Nonsense. If you dont like the political system then dont vote. Its simple as that. But wanting to say 'none of the above' is the whining of the pathetic. And its not even that original given the amount of drongos who claim that they would like this option.
Anarchists who think the whole system a load of bollocks and dont vote I can respect. Even those who cannot be arsed to vote, well thats there choice and whilst I think it wrong at least they dont try and act like attention seekers over it.
But the 'none of the above' clique are a waste of space. Lowest of the political low. Even people who go and vote BNP are worthy of more consideration in the political process.
Your list ? LOL. From what I have read on here you are the top of the piss and wind league so I'll take my chances and not lose to much sleep.
You aint got it in you.![]()
You're half right, but if you care to engage with the point above that joke post you might have some insight as to what is to be done about the vast disengagement and dissatisfaction with parliamentary politics
What ?
Lets imagine the morning of June 5th. The BNP have got at least one MEP elected.
Now do you think the political focus will be on those who voted BNP and the reasons why ? Or do you think that they will be concerned about the muppets who wrote 'none of the above' on the ballot paper or did not vote ?
Our political system is one in which things are ultimately decided by people voting. Its really as simple as that. Now you can have every smug and clever sounding conversation about it you want but none of it alters anything and the most illiterate and ignorant knuckle scraper who makes it to the voting booth come election day and votes BNP means more in terms of impact than the cleverest and most articulate proponent of the 'none of the above' option.
What ?
Lets imagine the morning of June 5th. The BNP have got at least one MEP elected.
Now do you think the political focus will be on those who voted BNP and the reasons why ? Or do you think that they will be concerned about the muppets who wrote 'none of the above' on the ballot paper or did not vote ?
Our political system is one in which things are ultimately decided by people voting. Its really as simple as that. Now you can have every smug and clever sounding conversation about it you want but none of it alters anything and the most illiterate and ignorant knuckle scraper who makes it to the voting booth come election day and votes BNP means more in terms of impact than the cleverest and most articulate proponent of the 'none of the above' option.
from: http://aceproject.org/electoral-advice/archive/questions/replies/705390375* in Sweden, where voters choose between multiple ballots and, to vote, they insert one in an envelope, they can choose a completely blank ballot instead of one with a party name.
* In India, where all candidates appear on one ballot paper there is no specific "none of the above" option, but voters can of course simply avoid marking a candidate.
* In Ukraine, there is a specific "none of the above" option available to the voters.
You're not getting me. What is to be done about the disengagement with the political process? You'll vote tory in the EU's cos you are a tory bastard and I'll vote no2eu because it's the only sensible option for a protest vote aimed at keeping out the BNP. A frightening majority won't bother cos they think the whole process is bollox and nothing really changes. Can you tell them they're wrong?
At least a NOTA voter makes a symbolic gesture, and your idea of 'they should stand and campaign rather than do a NOTA' is a nice idea but in realpolitik it isn't going to work.
There is going to be no revolution in this country. Its as simple as that. This is the system we have and there is nothing that is going to change that beyond some completely unforseen happening. All the wishful thinking and pontificating aint going to stop things.
So you either participate in things and vote or you dont. There really is no middle ground beyond being an attention seeking twonk (the one thing about the 'none of the above' crowd is that they never take advantage of the secret nature of our system).
Well you are right in that I will be voting Tory for the reasons you give but I would, if the BNP stood a chance in the South East, vote for who ever kept the pricks out. But I concede that I am probably more anti-BNP than you and dont put preconditions on trying to defeat them.
But pol

if you are that bothered by the lack of choice then make the effort and stand yourself.
Most people seem to have voted that this scandal hasn't changed their views, which is interesting. I wonder if this is because everyone thought that MPs were fiddling their expenses and this story is just confirmation. That's certainly how I feel...
Would a proportional representation system make those non voting people want to vote?