Di Caprio
I think people think he's shit cos of Titanic, but he's been good in practically everything else. Superb in Catch Me If You Can, the Aviator and The Departed.
Di Caprio
Megan Fox. Or is she just rated for being attractive? I don't know whether people actually think she's a good actress or not.

Shut up, he's lovely![]()
horseface himself nicolas cage
i don't hate him... i often like him but my god is he dreadful
bullshit. Tom Cruise, the actor, is highly under-rated. Of course, Tom Cruise the Film Star (aka the ego, the scientologist, the freak) is highly over-rated. But people who deny his skills as a performer are pandering to a populist agenda not dissimilar to the one which would proclaim him a "star". Rain Man, anyone? Collateral? Magnolia? Tropic Thunder? Mission Impossible 1 & 3? The Last Samurai? Only a fool would question the quality in any of them...
I like a lot of these films, and would add Minority Report to that list, but was Tom Cruise at all memorable in any of them? I don't think so.
I think Di Caprio is a much better example of an actor who people assume is shit cos he's popular. I think he's a fucking good actor, whereas I honestly don't think Cruise is, much as I dig Collateral, Rain Man and Minority report.
why has he ended up as an action film star? it beggars belief...
Tom Cruise made rain man (excellent, understated and competing with DHs showey performance) and collateral (who knew he could be such a convincing bad guy?) for me. Minority Report would have been good with whoever (will smith, matt damon, christian bale, maybe even nick cage....) but that is the nature of the Summer Blockbuster - find an indentikit "star" and surround them with special effects, then pray that the script, supporting cast, directing and marketing are better than last and next weeks release...
Tom Hanks (apart from Philadelphia)

Can't disagree. I'd add the appalling Clive Owen. Oh, and Rickman.inferno said:Keanu Reeves
Kevin Costner
Harrison Ford
These three are all "wooden" in the way they perform.
Big is good, mind you![]()
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned:
Keanu Reeves
Can't disagree. I'd add the appalling Clive Owen. Oh, and Rickman.

Also, Clint Eastwood. What is the fucking point of Clint Eastwood? You could just have a carboard cutout of him instead, it would be just as good at acting as the real thing and it would have the considerable advantage of not directing anything.
is he hugely rated? he's been in some big films but i don't think most people rate him hugely as an actor
one i'd add would be hugh grant. every sodding film it's the same crappy middle-upper class twit character. and four weddings was a pile of unfunny brit luvvy toss as well
Well, I don't think Big is good, but his presence doesn't generally ruin a film, it's just not going to make it good by the quality of his acting. As you say he's a safe bet; he's not bad enough to ruin a film that doesn't need good actors anyway, and he's a Name. It's not like he's Steve Gutenberg or something.
I'd forgotten Gutenberg existed until this post.Also, Clint Eastwood. What is the fucking point of Clint Eastwood? You could just have a carboard cutout of him instead, it would be just as good at acting as the real thing and it would have the considerable advantage of not directing anything.

Clive Owen always comes across like an American pretending to be British. Which is, as everyone knows, the most annoying thing in the entire universe.
Also, Clint Eastwood. What is the fucking point of Clint Eastwood? You could just have a carboard cutout of him instead, it would be just as good at acting as the real thing and it would have the considerable advantage of not directing anything.
Hanks ranks pretty high in the over-rated catergory.
He wins oscars for playing bland characters in bland films, he's whole being is geared towards being 'liked' and his only acting ability is doing a dopey dog look and a sincere everyman face. Ok, he clearly has one more expression than Keanu Reeves, but who rates Keanu anyway. Tom hanks is the Paul McCartney of the film world, with the only difference being that he was never in anything good to start with.
As for female actors, Rachel Weisz is bloody awful, she looks so uncomfortably in front of the camera I feel embarrased when I watch her.Would like her to be Catwoman though if Nolan chooses the character for the third film in his Batrilogy
]On the whole, most of the big stars get by without having to 'act', they just repeat versions of a role they've always played. Cage, Cruise, Pitt, Aniston, Hanks, Reeves...anyone big are just faces to plaster on posters, no one expect the to act do they?
Fight Club? You can't compare Pitt with Hanks. Hanks has never done anything as remotely as edgy as Fight Club or Twelve Monkeys.
The Oscars don't mean shit though. Hanks has never been in anything where he's Tried To be Good. He knows he's bland and plays bland. He does it well, for what it's worth.
He was hamming it up though in those films, not proper acting. Money for old rope.I agree with most of those choices, but it's hard to knock Rickman cos of Die Hard and robin Hood![]()
He was hamming it up though in those films, not proper acting. Money for old rope.
Yeah but that was the point. Hamming it up is a knack in itself