Savage Henry said:Why does it have to be serious critics that rate it though ? When Gladiator came out it was being heralded as a brilliant film and to be honest I'd rather watch Quo Vadis than that piece of shit again .
Apocalypse Now I think was a brilliant film ( although the redux is shite ) , yes it was tedious in places but that IMO helped make it better by creating a mood in the viewer which complimented the films direction , the cinematography IMO was excellent as well . While maybe not deserving the accolades it gets it's no way near the most overated film !
SpookyFrank said:Godfather part II. Coppola really laid an egg there methinks.
Another vote for the excorcist as well- you don't have to go far to find a scarier episode of doctor who.
killer b said:it was shit... i can think of loads of others from that period of british cinema - trainspotting, human traffic and the like - which were equally pooh...

Dirty Martini said:I quite liked that the first time I watched it, I think I was under the influence of Tom Paulin saying on The Late Review that it was like the great screwball comedies of the 1930s.
i seem to remember it being well thought of at the time... possibly the film review section of mixmag isn't the best place to go hunting out decent films, mind.jbob said:Human traffic is one of the worst films ever, and I can't think that anyone rated it![]()

niksativa said:I
The fact that so many people loved it just goes to show how people see the world, i.e., foreigners are idiots to be laughed at. Depressing.
LilJen said:I'm on a roll
Four Weddings and a fucking Funeral![]()
About a Boy? About a wanker more like....I had a feeling this would kick off - the first link I linked to ( http://www.arc.org/racewire/031112e_paik.html) is the most balanced and tries to make the case for and against - but even then they dont agree that there are "well balanced Japanese characters". The defence is 'lets deliberately make the Japanese one dimensional as a cinematic/storytelling device'. I think that gives too much credit - its just callous.Dubversion said:[Lost in Translation] There are lots of perfectly well-rounded Japanese characters, and the gags really are just about difference.
Both good calls - House of flyings daggers was even slower than CTHD. Hero was overrated too I think - give me a kick ass Hong King flick over this beautiful but boring bunch of movies any day.spanglechick said:Crouching Tiger, Hidden yawnfest. I tried, I really did. I went to see it at the cinema twice. I didn't fall asleep the second time, but I wish I had.
also, the Japanese version of the Ring. Not scary..
Nah - Excorcist in the cinema shat me up - Orange is classic UK cinema.Belushi said:A Clockwork Orange/The Exorcist
They're only remembered because they were banned.
With you on that. Plus it was boring. The average age of the "academy" is over 50 thats why crap like this wins endless OscarsLilJen said:and The English Patient, this is one of lovely P's favourite films, I thought it was turgid bollocks. And couldnt feel in the slightest bit sorry for the Ralph Fiennes character, he was a cock!
andy2002 said:Donny Darko – irritating bargain basement David Lynch cobblers.
andy2002 said:Crash – dreary liberal tosh about how racism isn't very nice. Yeah, thanks for pointing that out, it's something I'd never considered before. Matt Dillon's good in it at least.

jbob said:Regarding critical reception, I think it's virtually impossible for this to have some bearing on what you take to the film. Now, I think it's unlikely that you're going to implcitly trust the film reviewer in the Daily Star, and more likely that you'd listen to Mark Kermode, who, whatever your opinion of him, is a serious film critic and knows his stuff.
Savage Henry said:I thought crash was about people shagging in car wrecks![]()
niksativa said:Come on - where's the defenders of Shawshank Redemption? I know you're out there! Explain how this is the second greatest film of all time to me!
http://imdb.com/chart/top
Savage Henry said:but the point is films won't appeal to everyone so for one critic to like the film and another to dislike it means nothing . You listen to the critic that has similar tastes to you . So a review of a film from the daily star is just as valid as a review from Mark Kermode because they will be looking for different things ina film !
jbob said:Your argument is essentially meaningless, though. Is the news reporting of one media source of equal value to another, just because they're both expressing opinions? When looking for information on the Middle East, would you be more likely to value the opinion of Robert Fisk or Melanie Phillips? Likewise with Mark Kermode and the Daily Star film reviewer.

No, that's that other overrated film.Savage Henry said:I thought crash was about people shagging in car wrecks![]()
I've not read it, but I usually like about half his stuff.Savage Henry said:the book was good though !

andy2002 said:Donny Darko – irritating bargain basement David Lynch cobblers. The Bunnymen's Killing Moon is the best thing about it.
niksativa said:I haven't seen this 'cos thats what Im expecting...
You have obviously never been an assistant to someoneJ77 said:Devil Wears Prada - I think it got nominated for stuff, but what a shite film. Plus, that Hathaway has to be one of the shitest actresses out there.
(My gf got this out - she also thought it shite.)
LilJen said:You have obviously never been an assistant to someone
When people ask me what my job is, I use that film as a reference....they've got the role to a tee
Ain't that a living nightmare 
LilJen said:You have obviously never been an assistant to someone
When people ask me what my job is, I use that film as a reference....they've got the role to a tee
