Damn...I was just about to chuck in some trailer park humour to the debaterogue yam said:This whole thread has become so purile as to be beneath my consideration.
Damn...I was just about to chuck in some trailer park humour to the debaterogue yam said:This whole thread has become so purile as to be beneath my consideration.
fuck me you are an utter disgrace; so NOBODY living in say, Apartheid South Africa, germany in the 30s/40s, or soviet russia should opt for conscience over adherence to immoral laws? You'd havwe felt perfectly ast home in an SS unifrorm.rogue yam said:Grow up, kidd!
Fong said:You lot dismiss Yam for too easily.
I look at it like this.
Could I argue his corner?
Yep I could. I don't agree with it, but then I was taught as a kid to be able to debate any side of an argument.
I could jump into this debate on Yam's side and could hold a fairly decent argument with the rest of you, his views are not THAT far out. Aside from the national pride American's seem to express, other then that, I not really seen any posts of Yam's where i couldn't understand the point of view.
What on earth are you rambling on about Fong?Fong said:You lot dismiss Yam for too easily.
I look at it like this.
Could I argue his corner?
Yep I could. I don't agree with it, but then I was taught as a kid to be able to debate any side of an argument.
I could jump into this debate on Yam's side and could hold a fairly decent argument with the rest of you, his views are not THAT far out. Aside from the national pride American's seem to express, other then that, I not really seen any posts of Yam's where i couldn't understand the point of view.
you mean yet again you got your racist fake-xtian arse kickedrogue yam said:This whole thread has become so purile as to be beneath my consideration.
Just to quote you again (everyone else has)Fong said:You lot dismiss Yam for too easily.
I look at it like this.
Could I argue his corner?
Yep I could. I don't agree with it, but then I was taught as a kid to be able to debate any side of an argument.
I could jump into this debate on Yam's side and could hold a fairly decent argument with the rest of you, his views are not THAT far out. Aside from the national pride American's seem to express, other then that, I not really seen any posts of Yam's where i couldn't understand the point of view.
rogue yam said:This whole thread has become so purile as to be beneath my consideration.

><hundredthmonkey said:Of course I believe that the law is whatever they say it is. Pinches self hard.
hundredthmonkey said:Of course I believe that the law is whatever they say it is. Pinches self hard.
ViolentPanda said:There's only a few laws anyone needs to know.
1) Nothing is true, everything is permitted.
2) Love is the law, love under will.
3) There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.
Fong said:You lot dismiss Yam for too easily.
I look at it like this.
Could I argue his corner?
Yep I could. I don't agree with it, but then I was taught as a kid to be able to debate any side of an argument.
I could jump into this debate on Yam's side and could hold a fairly decent argument with the rest of you, his views are not THAT far out. Aside from the national pride American's seem to express, other then that, I not really seen any posts of Yam's where i couldn't understand the point of view.

rich! said:You forgot:
4) Everyone is a star
).

kage said:I think he announced at a gig the death of Reagan to the crowd then added something along the lines of "Pity it wasn't Bush".
That'd be enough to get some bullshit interrogation.
How does wishing somebody was dead consist a threat or an incitement to violence? And your refusal to accept the possibility that the law might possibly be wrong is telling, if rather touching in its naivite.rogue yam said:If he did it in America, it certainly would be. It is a violation of U.S. Federal Law to threaten the President, or to incite others to commit violence against the President. Hunter S. Thompson once got hauled in for a chat for writing in a column for the San Francisco Examiner that then-Vice President George H. W. Bush "should be stomped like a rat". HST, of course, continued to say pointedly critical things about American politicians, but he did drop the exhortations to violence. I think it's a perfectly good law, but that matters little. The fact is, it's the law.
Was that a B-side?oi2002 said:I think he should be locked in a cage in Guantanamo with a lonely goatherd.
,,,that's over half my life time ago ffs!!!!! 
hendo said:The FBI were wasting their time with Morrissey but I think it's a good idea to investigate people who publically threaten the life of the President.

bluestreak said:of course matt, don't be ridiculous. laws are the voice of the people and designed to protect us all. silly boy. grow a brain moran![]()

nino_savatte said:Moran is an Irish surname. I believe the word you are looking for is "moron"

ViolentPanda said:Sorry mate, it's also the spelling of "moron" used by some Bush-supporting fuck-knuckle who drew up a little counter-antiwar protest placard with the legend "Grow a brain, Moran" on it.![]()

And what if it turns out he was...how would your attitude change then?exleper said:I'm inclined to think this too, which if true would make Morrissey an even more enormous cunt than he already is.