Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Modern cameras have no soul


It is one hell of an ugly looking beast :)

52205630.Superb.jpg


This one camera I want to own.

I have a Voightlander Brilliant with a Heliar lens that cost peanuts at a car boot sale :)
 
ht

How can any plastic, we are out of date at point of sale digital compare to something like this? What camp are you in high tech bin it as the new model appears, or do any urbanites see the beauty in a classic camera like this. Should we not be trying to disentangle ourselves with the modern obsession with technology?

This is a deliberate troll trying to get an emotional response - it is Friday afternoon :D[/QUOTE]

My first camera was totally made out of plastic.

[IMG]http://www.ritzcam.com/catalog/images/SwingerSt.jpg
 
My first camera was totally made out of plastic.

SwingerSt.jpg

Nice colour at least it is not black plastic :)

Nobody picked up on the fact the 1930's Voightlander Brilliant TLR's and later Lubital both have plastic bodies.

The dogs bollock's Superb was an interesting TLR as it had parallax correction.
 
All I care about in a camera is that it can make the images I want, in the way I want. Tbh, I haven't got a digital camera to give me the images I want in exactly the right way, but that's because I haven't mastered them yet. My old Pentax gave me the best images, and it wasn't particularly pretty.

I like looking at these old cameras in the same way I like looking at an Edsel or a Studebaker. They look great as a piece of art, but I think I'd rather drive to work every day in a Toyota.
 
I think you can see why the Edsel didn't sell.

As for the folding compact cameras, perhaps it is time someone came up with a modern digital version. With some of today's faster lenses and the space for a larger sensor instead of the old 127 or 120 film it could be a winner.
 
I think you can see why the Edsel didn't sell.

Looks awesome now but compared to its pears an ugly duckling :D

As for the folding compact cameras, perhaps it is time someone came up with a modern digital version. With some of today's faster lenses and the space for a larger sensor instead of the old 127 or 120 film it could be a winner.

Good idea should be based on this version with similar lens and controls :)

864912908_d6bf352dd5.jpg


The camera was famous as a compact for use by the average soldiers in the trenches of WWI. Somewhere in the loft I have got one of these and a few negs. They are worthless now which is a shame.

http://flickr.com/photos/arkku/864912908/
 
I don't know if I can say the new cameras are soulless, but I think the process is, comparatively speaking. Film is a more soulful medium in my opinion because it involves more rituals. The mixing of the chemicals, the development of the film, the making of a print. It also engages more of the senses. The smell of the chemicals, the weight and feel of the jugs the chemicals are kept in, and the sound of the chemicals being poured in and out of the tank. There is also the making of a print, which has its own set of tactile sensations. Plus it is not something that is easily decided, the end print with film. This makes it a thing of the soul, in my mind.
 
Erm, I like to fantasize and speculate about cameras as much as the next person, but at the end of the day, the ideas and the resulting images are the main things, IMHO...

Edit: apologies for not reading the previous 100 posts.
 
Erm, I like to fantasize and speculate about cameras as much as the next person, but at the end of the day, the ideas and the resulting images are the main things, IMHO...

Edit: apologies for not reading the previous 100 posts.

leica_m8_zoom0.jpg


With its mixture of the old style rangefinder and digital I sometimes fantasize about one of these M8's but the cost brings me back to reality :)
 
Back
Top Bottom