Michael Moore's latest documentary drew tumultuous applause at the Venice film festival today, suggesting that the veteran tub-thumper has lost none of his power to whip up a response. If the film finally lacks the clean, hard punch provided by the record-breaking Fahrenheit 9/11, that can only be because the crime scene is so vast and the culprits so numerous.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/sep/06/capitalism-love-story-review
Sicko was a very powerful and worthwhile film, as where most of his other films, he gets the message out, job done, he isn't a auteur and doesn't claim to be, but yes he does have a bit of an ego, so what?
He preaches to and panders to the converted, and the easily pleased among the converted to boot.
That isn't any definition of 'accessible' I can recognise.
It wasn't too long ago that UK theater had to be approved by the government right? Things can go wrong in either direction....similarly the shock on Americans faces when they find out the BBC is funded through taxes and is therefore ad-free is hilarious! For commie-fearing Americans this is verging on revolutionary!
Sicko was a very powerful and worthwhile film, as where most of his other films, he gets the message out, job done, he isn't a auteur and doesn't claim to be, but yes he does have a bit of an ego, so what?
I'm a big fan. In my mind he's a working class hero. He hasn't been to Yale, he's just a normal guy whose ideologically driven, and all power to him. Yeah, he's become very successful (and rich), but not by selling out - he deserves his success. It wasnt handed to him on a plate - he dug in for every victory. Good for him.
It is accessible because he isn't an intellectual. He isn't professor of international relations with a PHD in sociology, and that makes his films what they are - a personal, ideologically driven take.
I know a number of what I would call socially conservative people, in the UK and the US, who have been provoked by his films. Americans I know all wanted to ask me about the NHS after seeing Sicko for example. They had no idea there was free healthcare here...
...similarly the shock on Americans faces when they find out the BBC is funded through taxes and is therefore ad-free is hilarious! For commie-fearing Americans this is verging on revolutionary!
*im looking forward to seeing this.
Shame to see someone who created Roger and Me turning out more crap.
absolutely.
Sicko was a superb film, very well put together and very powerful. Should be shown on a daily basis in the States at the moment
It's also simply not true that he simply preaches to the converted, if he did, there wouldn't be any right-wingers who could come along and 'correct' his facts.
And even if a viewer does broadly agree him already, there is still usually plenty to pick up and discover from each film.
You do have to give the guy a huge amount of credit for getting a documentary onto the big screen.
How many documentaries have you paid to go and see?
At least Mark Thomas is funny...

just note the scene in Bowling For Columbine where an interview of Matt Stone is followed by a cartoon that looks just like South Park. The implication that Stone and Parker had run it up was obvious, although neither had anything to do with it.![]()
Moore does all this for money.
I love it how unless you live self-sufficiently off the land in a hemp-entwined yurt wearing goats cheese slippers then you're a hypocrite to hold socialist views.
have you ever sat and watched Fox news for long?
that's the audience he wants to reach -
I've no problem with his style or his arguments. (I don't agree with most of them, but Mr Moore can argue what he likes.) It's the misrepresentation I dislike. He could do all the things you list and avoid that.there's a place for Moore. I know people on here get worked up about it but you aren't really his audience
and fame too