Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Michael Moore - Capitalism: A Love Story

yeah he's got an ego, but his films are accessible

I probably wont watch it as they're usually a bit too black and white for my liking......

whoever made the power of nightmares got the balance right :)
 
He preaches to and panders to the converted, and the easily pleased among the converted to boot.

That isn't any definition of 'accessible' I can recognise.
 
Michael Moore's latest documentary drew tumultuous applause at the Venice film festival today, suggesting that the veteran tub-thumper has lost none of his power to whip up a response. If the film finally lacks the clean, hard punch provided by the record-breaking Fahrenheit 9/11, that can only be because the crime scene is so vast and the culprits so numerous.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/sep/06/capitalism-love-story-review


Looks like many of the critics still like him
 
Sicko was a very powerful and worthwhile film, as where most of his other films, he gets the message out, job done, he isn't a auteur and doesn't claim to be, but yes he does have a bit of an ego, so what?

I'm a big fan. In my mind he's a working class hero. He hasn't been to Yale, he's just a normal guy whose ideologically driven, and all power to him. Yeah, he's become very successful (and rich), but not by selling out - he deserves his success. It wasnt handed to him on a plate - he dug in for every victory. Good for him.

He preaches to and panders to the converted, and the easily pleased among the converted to boot.
That isn't any definition of 'accessible' I can recognise.

It is accessible because he isn't an intellectual. He isn't professor of international relations with a PHD in sociology, and that makes his films what they are - a personal, ideologically driven take.

I know a number of what I would call socially conservative people, in the UK and the US, who have been provoked by his films. Americans I know all wanted to ask me about the NHS after seeing Sicko for example. They had no idea there was free healthcare here...

...similarly the shock on Americans faces when they find out the BBC is funded through taxes and is therefore ad-free is hilarious! For commie-fearing Americans this is verging on revolutionary!

*im looking forward to seeing this.
 
...similarly the shock on Americans faces when they find out the BBC is funded through taxes and is therefore ad-free is hilarious! For commie-fearing Americans this is verging on revolutionary!
It wasn't too long ago that UK theater had to be approved by the government right? Things can go wrong in either direction.
 
Sicko was a very powerful and worthwhile film, as where most of his other films, he gets the message out, job done, he isn't a auteur and doesn't claim to be, but yes he does have a bit of an ego, so what?

absolutely.

Sicko was a superb film, very well put together and very powerful. Should be shown on a daily basis in the States at the moment

It's also simply not true that he simply preaches to the converted, if he did, there wouldn't be any right-wingers who could come along and 'correct' his facts.

And even if a viewer does broadly agree him already, there is still usually plenty to pick up and discover from each film.
 
I'm a big fan. In my mind he's a working class hero. He hasn't been to Yale, he's just a normal guy whose ideologically driven, and all power to him. Yeah, he's become very successful (and rich), but not by selling out - he deserves his success. It wasnt handed to him on a plate - he dug in for every victory. Good for him.



It is accessible because he isn't an intellectual. He isn't professor of international relations with a PHD in sociology, and that makes his films what they are - a personal, ideologically driven take.

I know a number of what I would call socially conservative people, in the UK and the US, who have been provoked by his films. Americans I know all wanted to ask me about the NHS after seeing Sicko for example. They had no idea there was free healthcare here...

...similarly the shock on Americans faces when they find out the BBC is funded through taxes and is therefore ad-free is hilarious! For commie-fearing Americans this is verging on revolutionary!

*im looking forward to seeing this.

I agree with this post.
 
Shame to see someone who created Roger and Me turning out more crap.

Tried watching that recently and had to turn it off after 10 minutes because his voice was so grating. Even more so than normal, but I consider him a necessary evil. Why not fight fire with fire? Fuck me, have you SEEN Fox News lately?
 
absolutely.

Sicko was a superb film, very well put together and very powerful. Should be shown on a daily basis in the States at the moment

It's also simply not true that he simply preaches to the converted, if he did, there wouldn't be any right-wingers who could come along and 'correct' his facts.

And even if a viewer does broadly agree him already, there is still usually plenty to pick up and discover from each film.

Come on...Sicko made the NHS seem PERFECT and it's lovely and all but perfect it most surely ain't.
 
not really it didnt. Sure it skirted over many issues, but it was made for the US market, and was unashamed about its bias. It made the point, clearly and amusingly, that insurance systems were far far worse for the vast majority of people. And as that was what it aimed to do, then it did what it set out to do. Which is nice.
 
manufacturing dissent is a load of ol' shite tho, and it's kep complaints (that Moore DID interview Roger, but cut it from the film) is contradicted by Smith himself
 
You do have to give the guy a huge amount of credit for getting a documentary onto the big screen.

How many documentaries have you paid to go and see?

This. I've a lot of time for Mike Moore. He's done more to interest the man on the street - mainly in America, but elsewhere too - in some major issues of our times than most of the politico beard-stroking contingent ever will. Some of his stuff is rubbish, sure, but I can forgive him that.
 
Michael Moore is an excellent pamphleteer, but he plays too fast and loose with the facts. Without going into the lists of accusations and counter-accusations, just note the scene in Bowling For Columbine where an interview of Matt Stone is followed by a cartoon that looks just like South Park. The implication that Stone and Parker had run it up was obvious, although neither had anything to do with it. :hmm:
 
just note the scene in Bowling For Columbine where an interview of Matt Stone is followed by a cartoon that looks just like South Park. The implication that Stone and Parker had run it up was obvious, although neither had anything to do with it. :hmm:

I was left with the impression that they had created it and had to go check now to see if you were right lol.
 
there's a place for Moore. I know people on here get worked up about it but you aren't really his audience

the arguments seem to be
- it's too simplistic
- he's preaching to the converted
- this stuff is easy to find out
- he prefers cheap stunts and sensationalism to dry intellectual rigour
- also he is a fat vulgar american, and frankly, we disdain that sort of thing here.

have you ever sat and watched Fox news for long?

that's the audience he wants to reach - not the converted but other fat vulgar americans who don't have much time or interest for complex political theorising but do however think god made the world in 7 days, that President Obama is a muslim who hates white people and our treasured NHS is a socialist evil because Fox and other mainstream US media tell them that.
he is, in many ways, badly needed.
 
there's a place for Moore. I know people on here get worked up about it but you aren't really his audience
I've no problem with his style or his arguments. (I don't agree with most of them, but Mr Moore can argue what he likes.) It's the misrepresentation I dislike. He could do all the things you list and avoid that.
 
Just watched this.

It's really very good. As with any Michael Moore documentary, it could be tightened up in places and it starts off slow but really, the material is so strong it doesn't matter. He's doing what he does best - ordinary Joe telling it like it is. If you want spoilers, the Guardian review has plenty.

Less angry and more focused than I expected. It's a full on call for revolution.
 
It's quite irritating though, for a supposed revolutionary, when he reverts back to patriotic, flag-waving gawwwd bless america form. It's like ok, you're on the right path now just get over the rest of the bollocks too.
 
Any one got a torrent for this? It's been out since October and there's not been a whiff of it anywhere except for one really crappy cam copy.
 
Back
Top Bottom