rich! said:used to be the D(A)-notice committee had a website:
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305113503/http://www.dnotice.org.uk/
but now you get:
http://www.dnotice.org.uk/
"Forbidden
You don't have permission to access / on this server."
which I thought was good...
Mmmh. Interesting. The MoD still owns the domain name, though...
But while looking for alternatives I got a lovely announcement:
Nominet said:No such domain gov.uk
Typical. The revolution happens and they hush it up

No new D-Notices per se have been issued for decades. In fact some have been withdrawn - including highly specific warnings against revealing details of Soviet defectors.
Instead, selected editors are encouraged to contact the Admiral for "advice".
(For some reason it alway seemed to be an Admiral who was Chair of the Committee - until RAF bod Andrew Vallance in Dec 2004.)
The media convention has always been that the D-Notice/Defence Advisory system is a warning that going against the Admiral's advice would make prosecution under the Official Secrets Act rather likely; but also that when the government tries to prosecute journalists under the Official Secrets Act it ends up with egg on its face.
There has also been a belief that reporting that things have been reported overseas is less dangerous than original reporting in the UK. For example, when the Spies for Peace uncovered the system of post-nuclear-attack government in 1963, the UK papers sat on the information and waited to report the dreadful security breaches by papers in Belgrade.
This clearly isn't working in the case of the alleged Athens head spook, though.




