Marx/Lacan and the pornographic industry
- Thread starter kavenism
- Start date
revol68
what, fucking what?
Your point was that there are theorist I've never heard of, woah how profound.
Anychance you could give's a brief synopsis of his work and why it is soo much more profounder than anything us plebs would have heard of.
Saying that I remembered you love that fuckwit Habermas and he's a mouthpiece for EU liberalism.
Anychance you could give's a brief synopsis of his work and why it is soo much more profounder than anything us plebs would have heard of.
Saying that I remembered you love that fuckwit Habermas and he's a mouthpiece for EU liberalism.
gorski
customised free radical
You are a fuckwit, moron! That's why you are a nobody, especially with that shitty attitude of yours!!!
YOU have NOT shown anything at all - the opposite from what I claimed.
When you show how you spurious claims have ANY grounds - maybe!
Now, you do the hard thing and all the running...
[I am sick and tired of your shitty attitude!]
YOU have NOT shown anything at all - the opposite from what I claimed.
When you show how you spurious claims have ANY grounds - maybe!
Now, you do the hard thing and all the running...
[I am sick and tired of your shitty attitude!]
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
He told you to [shut up] once, he won't be so nice next time.
kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
Philozofee iz seriuz bizniz innit? Only 2b dun wiv a ver seriuz fayce and hed.
fogbat
The Talibum
gorski
customised free radical
You should apologise, as whatever you sent my way does apply to you and a lot more... I do remember you being extremely aggressive towards anyone who dares think differently than you - whatever you are it has nothing to do with what you think of yourself, so you can f*** off together with Dr. God here...
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
the death camp speaks
gorski
customised free radical
Says Kamarad Stalin... Now, there's a laugh!!! NOT!!!
Fogbat, you are a weirdo who is the only one who can't see how badly you're behaving to all that dare question any of your taboos!!! So, feel free to insert this up your hiney and enjoy it. I'm sure you will...
revol68
what, fucking what?
Says Kamarad Stalin... Now, there's a laugh!!! NOT!!!
Fogbat, you are a weirdo who is the only one who can't see how badly you're behaving to all that dare question any of your taboos!!! So, feel free to insert this up your hiney and enjoy it. I'm sure you will...
Gorski can you stop being a loon and just give me a brief outline of these theorists you are so proud of having read, if you are unable to do it could you send me a link to something that has a stab at it.
revol68
what, fucking what?
You know what you need to do to get that, deary...
Lwt's get this straight, you bemoan the fact that next to no one in the english speaking world has read these great theorists you claim are slinging out original insights and yet when asked to give a brief outline of their arguments or some sources you refuse todo so?
You are a very very odd man, it's almost as if you don't really understand the shit you name drop.
gorski
customised free radical
You're a piece of shit because you think that YOU [haha] can spit on any of the people who I mentioned WITHOUT EVER PROVING ANYTHING YOU SAID and that NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO QUESTION YOUR SHITTY ATTITUDE!!!
Twat! Full of yourself. Narcissism galore! Self-aggrandizing bozo!!! Go see a bloody psych!!!
In the meantime, I dare you to give us ANY proof whatsoever...
Twat! Full of yourself. Narcissism galore! Self-aggrandizing bozo!!! Go see a bloody psych!!!
In the meantime, I dare you to give us ANY proof whatsoever...
revol68
what, fucking what?
Sorry who have I spat on?
I think you miss my point, my post wasn't meant to be insulting to the theorists you name dropped, rather it was simply meant to contextualise them so as to counter your ridiculous notion of originality to which Zizek doesn't match up to.
Are their any contemporary theorists relatively heard of in the english speaking world that you rate?
I think you miss my point, my post wasn't meant to be insulting to the theorists you name dropped, rather it was simply meant to contextualise them so as to counter your ridiculous notion of originality to which Zizek doesn't match up to.
Are their any contemporary theorists relatively heard of in the english speaking world that you rate?
revol68
what, fucking what?
No, it was YOU who attacked the very possibility of originality!!!
[Jeez!
No i made a slightly tongue in cheek quib, that has an element of truth regarding the seperation of ideas and thoughts from their historical roots, a tendency that serves the full time intelligentsia quite well.
The initial argument was over Zizek's lack of originality, or so you claim.
I have now asked you numerous times to name and outline the work of some contemporary theorists who are producing the type of original insights that puts Zizek to shame.
bhamgeezer
Dogs bark
LOL (my academic contribution to this "debate")
articul8
Dishonest sociopath
interesting hypothesis philosophically, and true in an absolutist, metaphysical kind of way. But at the same time, pragmatically, what criteria allow something to count as "new" for us?
In language, anything totally and radically "new" would be utterly incomprehensible, as for meaning to take place their needs to be some common hermeneutical horizon in place to begin with.
