Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mark Steel - What's Going On?

no its deliberate piss take out of so called political rad comedians who do a bit of politics to the liberal gallery get a book or two published who i hav ealready had a run in with toynbes publisher on urban so if your gona promote steels book have th eballs to say BUY IT NOW but then thats not your style prefering insinuations as you do
 
It might well be, i'm not arguing different. I'm not arguing that pluto is in some way dependent on the SWP or vice versa - i'm just saying that historic links make it the first port of call for the SWP tops when they want to do proper books, and that those historic links might open a few doors.

edit:though, to undermine my own point it does seem polity press is more favoured nowadays.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto_Press

States it was set up by members of the International Socialists, but in '79 became firmly independent.

The two people, Richard Kuper and Michael Kidron (who developed a key idea of the IS tendency the theory of the permanent arms economy) who were heavilly involved in Pluto Press, as I understand it moved away from the IS/SWP when it turned to a more leninist, democratic centralist structure both being more libertarian. Kidron I think left quite early, Kuper left around the time the IS became the SWP.
 
Mark Steel is free to write what he likes, though it does concern me slightly that he is serialising in a bourgeois newspaper and giving succour to the class enemy - left liberals - who hate revolutionary socialism for very different reasons to some on here.
 
Mark Steel is free to write what he likes, though it does concern me slightly that he is serialising in a bourgeois newspaper and giving succour to the class enemy - left liberals - who hate revolutionary socialism for very different reasons to some on here.

£££££££££$$$$$$$$$£$£$£$£$££$$$£$£$£$£$£$£$£$£$£$£
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto_Press

States it was set up by members of the International Socialists, but in '79 became firmly independent.

The two people, Richard Kuper and Michael Kidron (who developed a key idea of the IS tendency the theory of the permanent arms economy) who were heavilly involved in Pluto Press, as I understand it moved away from the IS/SWP when it turned to a more leninist, democratic centralist structure both being more libertarian. Kidron I think left quite early, Kuper left around the time the IS became the SWP.

Kidron blatently 'took' the idea of the permanent arms economy from Schatman's group. See Higgins on this (and also the slogan neither washington nor moscow
 
Kidron blatently 'took' the idea of the permanent arms economy from Schatman's group. See Higgins on this (and also the slogan neither washington nor moscow

I think Marcel Duchamp said that if you have one original idea in your lifetime count yourself lucky. Trotsky was influenced in his theory of permanent revolution by a guy called Parvus. There was a whole book written arguing that Freud was not the inventor of the theory of the "unconscious" but that it had been floating around for years.
 
I think Marcel Duchamp said that if you have one original idea in your lifetime count yourself lucky. Trotsky was influenced in his theory of permanent revolution by a guy called Parvus. There was a whole book written arguing that Freud was not the inventor of the theory of the "unconscious" but that it had been floating around for years.

Wow thanks for the Parvus tip - i really had no idea.
 
Mark Steel is free to write what he likes, though it does concern me slightly that he is serialising in a bourgeois newspaper and giving succour to the class enemy - left liberals - who hate revolutionary socialism for very different reasons to some on here.

The bloke's been writing for The Independent for years. Now it's an issue? :confused:
 
The bloke's been writing for The Independent for years. Now it's an issue? :confused:

These wounds run deep :mad:

respect after the 2004 elections said:
We are all extremists now. Boycott the Indie!
11/06/2004
The Independent was top of the list of national newspapers attacking (and ignoring) Respect. They refused to print our news and even letters to the editor despite promising to, the new Labour lickspittle in charge did not respond to a letter from George Galloway asking for fair coverage, columnists like Johann Hari and Nick Cohen poured on vitriol, and on the morning of the election the paper described us as ‘a motley collection of extremists’.

It’s time for payback. We aren’t asking for flattering coverage but we do demand that the power of a newspaper is not employed to unfairly denigrate – all right, lie about us! – and in a democracy the best way of demonstrating what we feel is to boycott the newspaper. Its finances are fragile enough. Join us and vote with your pocket. Bust the Independent. We’re having the teeshirts, badges and stickers printed now. Boycott the Indie.
 
The bloke's been writing for The Independent for years. Now it's an issue? :confused:

I have no prob with Steel writing for the Independent, or Pilger writing for the Daily Mirror, or whatever. The only point I was making is that the middle class left liberals dislike the SWP for different reasons and motivations than many of the people on here, so ridiculing them in that context is giving succour to those who hate the very politics that presumably Steel would presumably still claim to espouse. But it's not that big a deal.

But it is no boon to get favourable reviews from Tribune or the New Statesman or whatever.
 
"George presents a radio phone-in on the Talksport channel, which is addictively entertaining because he speaks as if he's addressing a mass rally in Sao Paulo. So you seem to hear such snippets as, 'Your obfuscations and half-truths will succeed only in accelerating your descent into the snake-pit of oblivion you have brought about by your own reptilian actions - that is all I have to say to you, Dave from Basingstoke' ".

Very VERY embarrassingly loud laugh in quiet office. Thanks for that :p:D

I'm ordering a copy - it sounds like it's as good if not better than Reasons which I loved.
Saw his French Revolution show in Erith as well. Didnt stop laughing once. Fucking brilliant.
My union branch secretary is always trying to get me to be a member of the SWP but I have always refused and felt bad/guilty about it, but then someone from the party will talk to me about an issue with such utterly astounding one-sided certainty that I feel like I'm doing the right thing. And I agree that is not tantamount to The Right thing!
 
Very VERY embarrassingly loud laugh in quiet office. Thanks for that :p:D

I'm ordering a copy - it sounds like it's as good if not better than Reasons which I loved.
Saw his French Revolution show in Erith as well. Didnt stop laughing once. Fucking brilliant.
My union branch secretary is always trying to get me to be a member of the SWP but I have always refused and felt bad/guilty about it, but then someone from the party will talk to me about an issue with such utterly astounding one-sided certainty that I feel like I'm doing the right thing. And I agree that is not tantamount to The Right thing!

I am only certain of one thing....as Marx said his maxim was 'doubt all'

now, how about joining the SWP? :)
 
gosh, you're so generous. You're not going to hunt him down and have him shot then!

Do you deliberately try to sound like a complete arse, or is it just an accidental benefit?

genuinely accidental, I didn't express myself very well. I meant I have no problem with Steel attacking the SWP in print, it's his right, and life is more healthy for people having opinions and expressing them. In fact, as an ex-member of the SWP I'm quite interested to read his take on things, though, to be honest, I think he hadn't been an activist (outside of his journalism and comedy) for quite awhile.

It just makes me uneasy, for example, to hear that Steel does a gig and gets some laughs at the expense of his former comrades, 'cos it's a little ungracious, and if you're playing to a mainstream audience there are more important targets for comedy than mocking a small socialist group (it is afterall very easy to mock the far left), I don't really like the idea of left-liberals whose politics I detest getting satisfaction from the mockery of a marxist organisation, but then again our fairy godfather Lenin did say, "The reactionaries will pick up the crumbs from our table".

Anyway, I'm really not that fussed about this, it was just a vague emotion.
 
when did he say that?

In the spring of 1865

:)

Actually this was an answer given to a 'Confession' - that is a Victorian past time involving answering a questionnaire. His motto he said was "De omnibus dubitandum" - "doubt everything" from Descartes
 
Michael Rosen, Children's Poet by Appointment to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II? There aren't many Trots with such grand titles - though I admit I quite like him on Radio 4 sometimes.

MC5 is not the Children's Laureate in disguise, is he? Probably not.

He needs a title of some sort, though. The Trotty Teenagers' Laureate? The Old Folk's Special Trot? The World's Most Social Working Non-Member of Laureation Potential?

I don't know - perhaps we can just call him Em. Is that too familiar?

Thanks, I'll use some of that for new tagline. :)
 
people who leave the SWP go in all directions. Anarchists, Labourites or in some cases (Durruti), Nazi. Eh, MC5?
 
people who leave the SWP go in all directions. Anarchists, Labourites or in some cases (Durruti), Nazi. Eh, MC5?

Neither you, nor anyone else has been able to provide evidence of me calling anyone a 'nazi' on here.
 
Back
Top Bottom