FYI: The Freeman stuff does not challenge "the establishment", it's nonsense.
I like that cartoon, it’s so very true. A particular trait of conspiracy theorist is the idea that only their sect knows the truth and everyone else is sheep. It’s very seductive as we all like to feel special and/or more intelligent than each other.
The problem with the Freeman thing is it takes an abstracted romanticized notion of a historic social legal system (Common Law) and imbues it with a Natural Law theory derived not from any reasoned principles but divinity. Yes that’s right it’s God that grants you these natural rights.
Aside from the obvious point that different unverifiable claims can be made as to what is or isn’t a particular natural right it totally ignores the reality that common law was a socially constructed contract between people that resulted from a particular medieval power relationship. The vast majority of people were not ‘Freemen’ they were serfs tied to a Lord or Apprentices tied in bonded Labour to a trade. The common law of the land was barley upheld for anyone other than those with the power to demand respect. The Magna Carta was not written to grant everyone wonderful freedoms, but to enable a bunch of Baron’s to increase their power over the King.
By ignoring to provide any analyse of power structures, class struggle, meaningful solidarity, collective action and ownership, exploitation, Freemanship fails to understand the current social dynamics of our society.
Instead from what I see it’s adherents group together to try and find ways to dodge taxation systems to increase their own private wealth; shout like bag women in parks at people through megaphones, and waste police and court times by getting themselves nicked for breach of the peace.
If he hadn’t been such an idiot, not only would he still probably have had charges dropped, he wouldn’t have had to spend another night in the cells.
There is a difference between challenging authority, and resisting a challenge from authority.