Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mad Settlers attack the IDF

I've not researched this but it doesn't surprise me. That's only from my experience shopping.

I wonder if the changing political climate in America will have an effect on this. Assuming a change, that is.

Obama's choice of Rahmbo as his Chief of Staff would suggest that it's business as usual. :(
 
Cheers frogster. :)

Mossawa - it's no more acceptable to label all Jews as racists than it is to label all Muslims as terrorists. Both statements are laughable; they demonstrate only the ignorance and simple-minded bigotry of those who say such things. You started a thread before that suggested you were seeking to understand more of the history of how the ME ended up in this mess, but you don't seem to have digested the responses you got. We don't do racism here, and you won't last long if you carry on like this.
 
i should also add that Israel does have a place in Jewish theology, because the Jews were exiled from it, according to biblical teachings, either during the Babylonian period, or during 70 AD or several periods in between.

Basically, Israel has three meanings - the Jewish people, the land (of Palestine or Eretz Israel) or the zionist state. Israel - the Jews - were the "chosen people" and Israel - the land - became the "chosen land" for them to live. but nowhere does it say in the torah that Jews HAVE to live in Israel, or that non-jews can't live there. strictly speaking, zionism is a sacrilege to very orthodox Jews because, according to Biblical prophecy, the Jews were banished from Eretz Israel because of their sins and don't have a right to return until the messiah's arrival. Furthermore the state of israel was born of violence whereas the Messiah was meant to bring peace to the world.

the "israel" of jewish prayers means the jewish people, not the state, despite what some zionists believe - ie that judaism and zionism are identical - they are not.

the "promised land" and the "world to come" also occupy a very similar place in jewish theology and some jews even think they refer to the same thing - ie the afterlife, or a "spiritual" Israel where people will go when they die. Its all very confusing.

Biblical Israel btw covers a vastly larger area than the mandate of Palestine - including parts of Iraq, Jordan, Syria and even Turkey. apart from the more aggressive passages in the Torah there is very little to justify zionism in its present day form, in the bible.
 
i should also add that Israel does have a place in Jewish theology, because the Jews were exiled from it, according to biblical teachings, either during the Babylonian period, or during 70 AD or several periods in between.

Basically, Israel has three meanings - the Jewish people, the land (of Palestine or Eretz Israel) or the zionist state. Israel - the Jews - were the "chosen people" and Israel - the land - became the "chosen land" for them to live. but nowhere does it say in the torah that Jews HAVE to live in Israel, or that non-jews can't live there. strictly speaking, zionism is a sacrilege to very orthodox Jews because, according to Biblical prophecy, the Jews were banished from Eretz Israel because of their sins and don't have a right to return until the messiah's arrival. Furthermore the state of israel was born of violence whereas the Messiah was meant to bring peace to the world.

the "israel" of jewish prayers means the jewish people, not the state, despite what some zionists believe - ie that judaism and zionism are identical - they are not.

the "promised land" and the "world to come" also occupy a very similar place in jewish theology and some jews even think they refer to the same thing - ie the afterlife, or a "spiritual" Israel where people will go when they die. Its all very confusing.

Biblical Israel btw covers a vastly larger area than the mandate of Palestine - including parts of Iraq, Jordan, Syria and even Turkey. apart from the more aggressive passages in the Torah there is very little to justify zionism in its present day form, in the bible.

Well said.
 
and what makes it even more confusing - and even sicker - is that there are a small number of jewish palestinians(!!!) who are treated just as badly by the israeli state as anyone else ...
 
and what makes it even more confusing - and even sicker - is that there are a small number of jewish palestinians(!!!) who are treated just as badly by the israeli state as anyone else ...

For the nationalist-Zionists, the existence of such people is a constant reminder of their lies and prejudices.
 
Jewish Palestinians, eh? Got any more on that one? :hmm:
There have been Jews living in Palestine for over 2000 years. Some ended up on the Palestinian side of the green line after the Nakba and some who ended up in what we now know as Israel still call themselves Palestinians. The Neturei Karta are notorious for this self-designation, but it's not that uncommon amongst non-orthodox and secular Jewish Israelis. I've certainly met a couple or three.

Q: "When did you come to Israel?
A: "I didn't, Israel came to me.

The Palestinian National Covenant in 1968 defined a Jew as a Palestinian if their family (through the male line) had resided in Palestine until the beginning of the Zionist migrations (considered to have started in 1917). While a number of Jews fall into this category, the vast majority tend to identify as Israelis.

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Palestinian-Jew

Mizrahi Jews are Arabs, of course. IIRC, some argue that the term "Mizrahi Jew" was coined because the term Arab-Jew was counter-productive from a propaganda point of view. This article is interesting, anyway. Reflections of an Arab Jew

And there's always Jeff Halper, the world's only known American-Israeli-Palestinian Jew. :D
 
frogwoman said:
Biblical Israel btw covers a vastly larger area than the mandate of Palestine - including parts of Iraq, Jordan, Syria and even Turkey. apart from the more aggressive passages in the Torah there is very little to justify zionism in its present day form, in the bible.

which goes some way to explaining why so many settlers are so hostile to giving up land that blatantly isn't theirs, because they believe that a very large part of the arabian peninsula is rightfully theirs ...
 
the doctrine of zionism when it first appeared was universally condemned by all religious jewish organisations for several reasons:
Err...how about also because new ideologies and organizations threaten the power and influence of the people that head up existing ones within a people/faith?
 
Settlers vs IDF.

Who wins? Who gives a fuck?

Actually I would be on the side of the IDF in this instance.

Be great if a breakaway faction of forward thinking Arabs sided with moderate IDF soldiers in an effort to fuck the settlers both ways...
 
Settlers vs IDF.

Who wins? Who gives a fuck?

Actually I would be on the side of the IDF in this instance.

Be great if a breakaway faction of forward thinking Arabs sided with moderate IDF soldiers in an effort to fuck the settlers both ways...

"fascist" is the best word to describe the settlers tbh (the radical ideological settlers, not the poor sods with the misfortune to have been "encouraged" to live there by the government)

plenty of people go on about how bad and terrible the settlers are but not many people listen to what they're actually saying

it's basically the same as any other fascist ideology anywhere in the world. religion - as in obeying all the laws of the torah - doesn't come into it as much as does ethnocentric jewish nationalism
 
I had the misfortune to stumble across a radical settler village near Hebron.

No attempt to hide their blatant facist ideas.

Absolutely the lowest form of scum I have ever encountered.
 
the're even going to the extent of organising orangemen type parades through palestinian villages now ...
 
the're even going to the extent of organising orangemen type parades through palestinian villages now ...

Yup. Nutjobs, one and all.

It's the kids you feel sorry for, being born into all that hate and shit.
 
The irony of ironies! Olmert likens the settler attacks to "pogroms".

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Sunday called arson and shooting attacks by settlers against Palestinians in Hebron last week a "pogrom" and said that "as a Jew, I am ashamed that Jews could do such a thing."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1227702466516&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

Correspondents say Mr Olmert's use of "pogrom" has particular resonance.

It is usually associated with the anti-Semitic violence Jewish people experienced in Europe and Russia in the 19th and 20th centuries.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7770384.stm
 
Ehud Olmert maximising a fragile political situation for political gain, whatever next!
 
Back
Top Bottom