It is hard to tell:cathal marcs said:What do 'terrorists' look like exactly? Do they have two heads or something? Or three eyes yeah thats it.
sihhi said:I've been reading a few reoprts Re housing and segregation unease in Protestant communities.
Apparently there is a belief among working class Protestants that Sinn Fein want unionist people out of North Belfast
and that Catholics are in general trying to take houses away from Protestants- when housing conditions for Protestants are not good at all (the houses that haven't been repaired have gone downhill aswell)- basically that Catholics were getting all the goodies.
flypanam said:But with scarce resources that impression that the other side are getting all the benefits is going to be rampant.
I'd dispute that SF have this as a policy these days but it is a stark reality that ethnic cleansing was a large part of the troubles and the means by which terrorists on both sides asserted control of their communities it continues to be practiced.sihhi said:I've been reading a few reoprts Re housing and segregation unease in Protestant communities.
Apparently there is a belief among working class Protestants that Sinn Fein want unionist people out of North Belfast...
but does mourn it's nobilityhe governments can try to restart the process as if nothing had happened, giving us two more years of posturing in which all excitement about the agreement's radical ideals is stripped away. Or they can acknowledge the futility of trying to build shared governance on mutual hatred and begin a new political process that puts sectarianism where it should - not as a solution but as a problem.
It defines Northern Ireland as a political space and seeks to do so in a genuinely radical, exciting way. It is, indeed, perhaps the boldest constitutional document ever agreed between sovereign states. It creates a space that is not ultimately claimed by any state, defines national identity as potentially both mutable and multiple, and rests sovereignty, not on history or geography but on that most complex and fluent of things - the collective mind of a majority of the population.
My understanding of what's going on in North belfast is the following (somebody may have better information).sihhi said:I've been reading a few reoprts Re housing and segregation unease in Protestant communities.
Apparently there is a belief among working class Protestants that Sinn Fein want unionist people out of North Belfast
and that Catholics are in general trying to take houses away from Protestants- when housing conditions for Protestants are not good at all (the houses that haven't been repaired have gone downhill aswell)- basically that Catholics were getting all the goodies.
gurrier said:The prod population is declining as anybody who can moves out to the suburbs does so. The catholic population is increasing. Hence there is huge pressure for housing for catholics and a fair amount of empty housing in prod estates. The loyalists see this as some sort of ethnic cleansing of their areas and have responded by burning out and otherwise rendering uninhabitable empty houses in their areas as otherwise catholics will be moved into them. However, they are facing the impossible opponent of population movements and the fact that no sane person would choose to move into a front-line loyalist controlled area in North belfast (would you want to live in an area controlled by psychopathic drug dealers?) The catholic population, for various reasons to do with the troubles is much less fragmented and their criminals at least have to pretend to do their bit for social cohesion (mostly be kneecapping teenagers unfortunately) and hence there is much less of a movement out of the area.
Nah the middle class flight model just isn't applicable to Belfast ghettos. The Prods did leave Belfast though.sihhi said:Yes-- the selectivity of this migration is important- poorer working class Protestants have remained in inner Belfast while rich more middle-class "sell out types" have left and don't have any attachment to the paramilitaries, don't see the release of Sean Kelly as particularly significant...
You have proof???revol68 said:it's the same reason the IRA was able to pull off the biggest robbery in british history and get away with it.
No son these arseholes are fighting the police because they don't want to be forced to allow their fellow countrymen similar rights as their own. Like the KKK in America were non so keen on equal rights for blacks.tube said:The level of violence in these riots has been quite shocking. loyalists never normally have the co ordination or fight in them for prolonged attacks on the police. But this goes beyond even republican civil unrest (republicans generally made sure to keep gunfire away from riots).
Of course the question I have for all two bit radicals out there is, if these people are fighting the police and army because they don't want to be forced into another state then surely you should be defending their right to independence. Surely that is the logic of national liberation?
I think republican attacks worked. It let them know they weren't happy with the service. If you buy faulty goods from Argos you don't just sit in the house and hope they come round and refund you. You have to give them a little nudge.:rolleyes: said:Of course there is nothing progressive about this violence much like there is nothing progressive about republicans attacking the security forces, it tends to boil down to machismo, hoods and good dash of bigotry.
Who's the arseholes?Oh and for all the arseholes who think the PSNI will go easy on them, believe me they won't. In fact they've already returned live rounds.
AgreedIm still quite shocked that loyalists could co ordinate such sustained rioting, normally they do after a few pints and then fuck off home when they start to get a sore head.
I would be very surprised if you ever could produce a child, never mind a great child.fanta said:Ultimately, I'm begining to susect that it does not matter what the British government do or don't do.
This conflict will still be ongoing when our great children are becoming parents.

Dilzybhoy said:I would be very surprised if you ever could produce a child, never mind a great child.
I'm begining to "susect" that you don't live in a glass house.![]()
fanta said:You know what I meant - our great grandchildren.
I don't think that the British government are able to do anything to solve the conflict. Leaving Northern Ireland, though I think and want that to happen eventually, would only confirm the worst fears of unionists and lead to open civil war. They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
The Republicans have never done enough to convince ordinary working class Protestants that their future would be safe and indeed better within the framework of a united Ireland.
Quite simply, the two communities hate each other with a murderous passion. The simplistic Republican perspective that the root cause of the conflict is just British imperialism is as archaic as it is false.
Yes, the British have too often exacerbated and compounded the problem, but Northern Ireland suffers from the worst sort of tribal antipathy which can be traced back to the Reformation and the religious wars of the 17th century rather than merely 19th and 20th century British interference.
There, I said it...
i`m not even gonna bother!!!!!You might be interested to read the thread and not confine yourself to dealing with the imaginary republican windmills in your head. Your comment bears no relation to the majority of contributions to this thread, not even vaguely. You could also perhaps try to add something of your own analysis rather than just sniping.revol68 said:seems like fantas the only one able to get past the "anti imperialist" rhetoric and deal with actual reality. Youse might be interested to know that his views are probably the most common amongst people in the north and certainly amongst those who are fed up with the whole sorry mess.
revol68 said:i think the general feeling in loyalist areas is that everyone has fucked off and left them in a mess.
I don't think that this is accurate. For example, it certainly isn't a fair characterisation of the SP line.revol68 said:I think the left in Ireland has not done much to help overcome this, generally preferring to wait on prods embracing some republicanism sweetened with a crap "socialism",
Isn't this a very good argument as to why working class prods really do need to break with loyalism urgently? We are at a stage where the way that loyalty to the state is manifesting itself is blast bombs against her majesty's forces and the potential disbandment of the RIR is protested against by shooting at the RIR. I reckon that a clear break with loyalism is an urgent necessity and that any attempts to win influence for socialist politics that doesn't tackle this glaringly obvious fact head on is pointless and divorced from reality (the failure to do this is one of the reasons why I think the SP has had so little success in the wee north). Of course all this is much easier said than done, and there are a whole load of very concrete reasons why it is incredibly difficult (UDA/UVF/RHC/LVF come top of the list).revol68 said:I think the left in Ireland has not done much to help overcome this, generally preferring to wait on prods embracing some republicanism sweetened with a crap "socialism", continously we were told that prods had to break from "unionism", well now unionism has broke with them and the left hasn't a clue what to fucking do.
The presence of people who disagree with you is all the more reason to debate things. Not necessarily to persuade them, but an argument which has to deal with a wide range of contrary views is much more convincing to interested and open-minded observers.revol68 said:Anyway as i siad im not debating this on urban cos it's filled with moronic british leftists and plastic paddies like dilzybhoy.
Well I've called it nihillistic monarchism so I don't completely disaggree. But it's easy to get misled by the symbols of Loyalism. Most Ulster Prods have traditionally been patriotic in a very old fashioned way; a way that makes neo-facists like the BNP totally unelectable in Belfast simply because thay speak rather too well of Hitler. That is changing rapidly there has always been a deeply rebellious core in Loyalism that loyalty is ultimately to the community not to the perceived traitors in London. You also have a very nasty strain of terrorism/gangsterism that has been fostered by the post-GFA failure of policing and as always there is the old pattern of the young turks asserting control.gurrier said:...I also think that the whole sorry mess in loyalist areas is a good example of the consequences of having a working class ideology defined by loyalty to the state. They got some minor privileges and favouritism while they were needed but as soon as they weren't needed anymore they got cast away and left with shattered communities and an ideology that is entirely useless as a tool for understanding the world. A realisation of this on some level could be behind this latest flare up, which appears almost nihilistic in nature.
revol68 said:Anyway as i siad im not debating this on urban cos it's filled with moronic british leftists and plastic paddies like dilzybhoy.

I know you were talking to the wee Larne man, but I feel I must add a question at this point.Dilzybhoy said:I think republican attacks worked. It let them know they weren't happy with the service. If you buy faulty goods from Argos you don't just sit in the house and hope they come round and refund you. You have to give them a little nudge.
cathal marcs said:And you criticise Republicans for not debating with working class unionists. You really are full of your own importance you diva you.
fanta said:He has a point though doesn't he.
We have more than our fair share of narrow-minded sectarian armchair wannabe-provos who regale us with fascinating posts about how brave and righteous the IRA are in their heroic struggle against imperialism, all courageously posted from the safety of their PC screens, of course.

fanta said:He has a point though doesn't he.
We have more than our fair share of narrow-minded sectarian armchair wannabe-provosIf you are refering to Dilzy I have yet to see a post by him that is sectarian. Some of his posts have been kneejerk reactions tobeing called a 'chuckie' a bit of a blanket condemnation of allrepublicans which I believe yo are as you once said you wanted a 32 county socialist republic a while backYes he may support the provisional movement fair enough many people do. It doesn't mean they are 'sectarian'.
Secondly why shouldn't someone in the UK take an interest in the O6? I mean they are under rule of the UK afterall. If you use the logic you must be living there to have a correct view then who knows Adair may have a pointthat overrules anyone else. Or you have no right to speak about other issues such as Palestine, Iraq or basically anything. Sadly too many folk in the 6 counties seem to think they are the epicenter of the world.
May I add even if he has a point there is no use for the words 'wanker', 'arsehole', 'gobshite',and 'moron' in two rather short posts not saying anything bar how he is abve the rest of us and how stupid we all are![]()
BTW check your PM![]()