AnnO'Neemus
Is so vanilla
Wasn't there a post in the office scolding email thread about that issue, about people doing smelly poos in loos that opened straight onto a corridor and people being told off about offensive smells because visitors to the building had to walk through that corridor?having worked somewhere with private loos - the downsides are these:
when they are occupied, you have to loiter outside in the corridor, and everyone knows you're waiting for the loo. Whereas noramlly you could wait in the sinks and mirror bit.
when someone has made the loo smelly, the smell drifts straight out into the corridor when they open the door. When the door is then closed, the remaining smell has much less chance to dissapate than it does over and under traditional stall partitions.
toilett rolls seem to be allowed to run out more often. if the loo is occupied, there's nowhere for the cleaner to leave the spare loo rolls.
you're right about the positives, but the negatives make me prefer a cubicle and lobby format, having experienced both.
So, yeah, single loo opening straight onto a corridor/thoroughfare would be awful.
And I was going to mention all those reasons Badger Kitten said as well, about women crying in loos and office gossip and getting ready for going out after work stuff, so you need that communal basins and mirrors area. And that bit about men taking reading material into loos and contemplating their navels and making them smelly, so it being better not to have unisex loos. I reckon that American law series Ally McBeal has a lot to answer for. Single sex communal loos are the way to go.






