Nonsense, Louloubelle. This thread would have worked perfectly well if you hadn't insisted on evangelising all over it!
e2a: In fairness you're not the only one, but you're by far the most persistent.
Look, I appreciate your medical problem and I'm genuinely sorry about your mum, but I've no patience with evangelists, especially when their first post on here was misplaced. I know you said it wasn't a personal attack, but it did look a little like one, and it was, as I said, misdirected. I did ridicule the idea of a smoking ban when it was first mooted, and I was wrong to do so. I fully accept that smoking is a pretty antisocial habit, and a harmful one, although it does frustrate me that some people seem to have got it out of proportion and forgotten than the effect of smoke is cumulative: continuous exposure to it is not going to do you any good, whereas the odd whiff is unlikely to do anyone any measurable harm at all.
That's why I came round to the view I now hold, which is that smoking should be restricted, but that a blanket ban is overly draconian. I don't see what harm a separate, ventilated smoking room in pubs etc would do, given that staff would have to spend a minimal amount of time in there. Nor do I believe it would fill up with non-smokers selfishly dragged in there by smoking friends: I and most smokers I know happily go to non-smoking venues with non-smoking friends, and go outside for a fag when we feel like it. I can't agree with banning smoking in the street either: there is pretty much no evidence that in the open air tobacco smoke is harmful to non-smokers, and you can't legislate on the basis of not liking something.
There you go. I've stated my position. I hope you can respect that, and I also hope you can accept that those of us who do smoke might want to share info on places that have good facilities for us to do so, and that maybe, just maybe, we're not up for being moralised at whilst doing so!