maestrocloud said:Indirectly through social darwinist theories & the accompanying bullshit?
Darwin was White Nationalist?
,,,sits down to be taught...give? 
maestrocloud said:Indirectly through social darwinist theories & the accompanying bullshit?
,,,sits down to be taught...give? 
Well, Zenie...zenie said:Is JC2 a Racist??????
![]()

I agreespanglechick said:in my experience, a seven year old kid couldn't be smart enough to write that - her race is irrelevant, and hinting that this is the reason why people find it suspicious is a bit odd tbh.
Very bright kids of seven can have extraordinary vocabularies - they have potential to retain huge numbers of facts and massive detail - but the level of philosophical understanding here implies an analytical maturity i have never heard of in a child of seven.
In the unlikely event that a 7 year old wrote that poem, she might be forgiven for not fully understanding evolutionary theory and the garblemanglebollocks that social darwinists have tried to make of it though.In Bloom said:Yeah, because racism never existed before Darwin, did it?
In any case, Darwin was no white nationalist and there is nothing racist about Darwinian evolutionary theory.
Not Darwin himself but the way his theories were later interpreted:boskysquelch said:Darwin was White Nationalist?,,,sits down to be taught...give?
![]()
http://www.ioa.com/~shermis/socjus/socdar.htmlThe Misapplication of a Biological Theory
But, for our purposes, it is the use to which some people made of biological evolution which concerns us. Some simplified the idea to "survival of the fittest." Others believed that an identical process took place among human beings. They believed that white Protestant Europeans had evolved much further and faster than other "races." And some, especially the followers of Herbert Spencer, took it one step further. Human society is always in a kind of evolutionary process in which the fittest- which happened to be those who can make lots of money--were chosen to dominate. There were armies of unfit, the poor, who simply could not compete. And just as nature weeds out the unfit, an enlightened society ought to weed out its unfit and permit them to die off so as not to weaken the racial stock.
boskysquelch said:I think that's spitting on a mentally retarded black girl not run over.....

+ ignores irrelevant link as arguement is made redundant by first line of responsemaestrocloud said:Not Darwin himself but the way his theories were later interpreted:

maestrocloud said:<can't be arsed>
...mouth!
...fingers? ..oh i dunno...where DOES it come from Joooooooooooohnnnnny???!
Glisters.boskysquelch said:all that glitters is not gold...
In Bloom said:Not only is the idea of a seven year old child writing anything that sophisticated utterly ludicrous, since when did Darwin have anything to do with White Nationalism?![]()
Mation said:Glisters.
foreigner said:Judging from the picture I'd say her parents are very proud of her in a re-live-my-youth-through-my-kids kind of way.
..well! apparantly Bro Ashante is a single-parent. 
boskysquelch said:yeah given the chance::
![]()
![]()
bfg said:They've not got the years or the life experience yet. And for as long as they're been taught at home by Nazi mum, and Nazi grandad, in some hick backwater, they'll both probably be in their 70s when they do. They've also got as much natural artistic talent as every other white power dickhead band they appear on stage with

Well, there was that thing were he played a major role in the enslavement, brutalisation and eventual genocide of an entire aboriginal people.boskysquelch said:+ ignores irrelevant link as arguement is made redundant by first line of response
read the poem.
what about Columbus? what's his story as a racist vampire?
keen to learn.![]()
precisely....hmmmmmDonna Ferentes said:Seven-year-olds say "paradigm"?
It might be shit, but it does show a grasp of vocbluary and concepts above the level of any seven year old I've ever encountered.slaar said:I can believe it was written by a seven year old, it's shit.
Agreed. Which is why if it was her, it's impressive for that.In Bloom said:It might be shit, but it does show a grasp of vocbluary and concepts above the leve of any seven year old I've ever encountered.