Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Linux

Global_Stoner said:
it didn't detect my sound card or wifi card, couldn't play my media files or run my screen at its maximum resolution.
Without details there's little anyone can do to help. :(
 
Signal 11 said:
Without details there's little anyone can do to help. :(


Its ok, I've helped myself, I'm using xp again....was just having a play and was suprised that it didn't do it all out the box. That said it is impressive that you can stick on a usb key and it boots

I want to like linux, I like the idea its free and not made MS or another big corp, but until it can do that its not ready to use for the majority of pc users.
 
It's more like peripheral manufacturers not producing a linux driver. Still, can't blame them avoiding extra expense when the market's not that big.

Chicken & egg situation - not enough punters to make linux drivers worthwhile and lack of hardware support means less punters.
 
Genuine question, do all the drivers that come with xp get supplied by the manufacturers to MS for the install CD of windows or how does it know what everything is?
 
Global_Stoner said:
Genuine question, do all the drivers that come with xp get supplied by the manufacturers to MS for the install CD of windows or how does it know what everything is?
Mostly it's manufacturers. MS does generic drivers, and probably tweaks others.

And yes, it's exactly a chicken and egg scenario, which is why Linux makes the most sense on a controlled hardware platform, where all drivers can be provided and conflicts resolved before it gets into the hands of users. Which is exactly what mac OS X does.

Window's massive hardware range is its strength and weakness. Stregth because of the massive choice (and the cheapness that comes with that choice) and weakness (it's impossible to actually test all the combinations of hardware that windows supports). Linux does not have this range, and it is only when coming from windows that it becomes painful. Now that you can buy computers with linux pre-installed, I'd reccommend it as the best way to get into it.
 
gnoriac said:
Still, can't blame them avoiding extra expense when the market's not that big.
They don't need to do it themselves.
Desktop Linux needs drivers. Right? Of course. So why is Novell's Greg Kroah-Hartman, a Linux kernel developer and head of the Linux Driver Project, having to ask people to tell him about devices that need drivers?
[...]
He also wondered if the problem of Linux device drivers has been overstated: "I don't currently know of any common piece of hardware in use today that is not supported on Linux. And since these vendors do not know, and I don't, I'm asking the world to help out," he said.
[...]
So if you want a specific device that doesn't work on Linux to be properly supported on Linux, Kroah-Hartman would appreciate it if you would mark up the project's Drivers Needed wiki page with the details. Or, for that matter, he encourages you to just e-mail him with your suggestion.
 
If you can't play games, then what does it matter if you can't get drivers for your 3D card, or have I missed the point. :confused:

To be fair these are the only drivers I installed on my PC, but thats because I think you get better performance with proper Nvidia ones.
 
Signal 11 said:
Which ones?
All of them, AFAIK. I'm just going by what I read, mind - "ATI refuses to open drivers" that sort of thing. And my experience bears this out when I tried running ubuntu last year. Couldn't get my resolution up, and couldn't enable TV-out.

More than just games for 3D card - design, video acceleration etc.
 
Global_Stoner said:
If you can't play games, then what does it matter if you can't get drivers for your 3D card
Why wouldn't you be able to play games?

Global_Stoner said:
To be fair these are the only drivers I installed on my PC, but thats because I think you get better performance with proper Nvidia ones.
I have an NVidia card in this machine and 3D support is working fine using the proprietary driver from NVidia. I wouldn't get another one though now that intel's graphics hardware is properly supported with open source drivers.
 
Crispy said:
"ATI refuses to open drivers" that sort of thing. And my experience bears this out when I tried running ubuntu last year. Couldn't get my resolution up, and couldn't enable TV-out.

More than just games for 3D card - design, video acceleration etc.

I've never had an ATI, but a search shows this:
Q1: What features are provided by the ATI Proprietary Linux Driver?
A1: The ATI Proprietary Linux driver currently provides hardware acceleration for 3D graphics and video playback. It also includes support for dual displays and TV Output.

Q2: Which ATI graphics cards can use this driver?
A2: The ATI Proprietary Linux driver currently supports Radeon 8500 and later AGP or PCI Express graphics products, as well as ATI FireGL 8700 and later products. We do not currently plan to include support for any products earlier than this. Drivers for earlier products should already be available from the DRI Project or Utah-GLX project.
http://ati.amd.com/products/catalyst/linux.html
 
I've used Linux exclusively for about five years now; I decided that Gates had enough money.

I agree with OP: it doesn't just work. You're lucky if it does. I'd save time and loads of grief if I used XP.

As to why it's still not a prime-time consumer OS, it should be obvious: it's the money, innit. Hardware manufacturers devote resources to get their kit working with Windows before they release it; it's up to amateurs to code the drivers for linux and the most they can expect from the hardware makers is information, and often even that is withheld. Buy the latest graphics/sound/wifi card, chances are the volunteer coding corps won't have caught up with the microserfs. And the pace of innovation is such that almost any new motherboard will have some part of some on-board chipset needing a driver not yet in the standard distros, needing a day of forum-searching, downloading and compiling.

But, for me, it's about the politics. Free as in beer is very nice, but free as in speech is what matters. I want to know that I can, should I choose to, open the hood and control exactly what is happening on my machine. Unfortunately, the cost of this is that I HAVE to get my fingers metaphorically dirty much more often than I'd like to.

But, it's a price worth paying; and, tbh, I do get some geek satisfaction from it.
 
Signal 11 said:
Why wouldn't you be able to play games?

Didn't think they were available. At the moment I'm playing Crysis, CoD 4, Civ 4, Far Cry and Eve. I know Eve has just got linux client, but I thought the rest of them were windows only titles.
 
fortyplus said:
I'd save time and loads of grief if I used XP.
I have to use XP for work and it's nothing but grief, in daily use, not just in the one-off install/config process. TBF though that's just like Windows users experience when they try Linux -- it's down to what you're used to.

Agreed with everything else you said though. :)
 
Global_Stoner said:
Didn't think they were available. At the moment I'm playing Crysis, CoD 4, Civ 4, Far Cry and Eve. I know Eve has just got linux client, but I thought the rest of them were windows only titles.
Well, running Windows executables on Linux is a different issue from hardware support -- e.g. you wouldn't expect to run Macintosh executables on Windows. However there are some options, cedega seems to be the most highly recommended. There's some information about it and the other options here.
 
Signal 11 said:
I've never had any hardware that wasn't supported, in over 10 years. I'm sure it is annoying when you have bought hardware for Windows and find that Linux doesn't support it, but whatever it is that the hardware does, you can get one that is supported IME.
You must be very lucky there seems to be quite a few on this thread alone which have had problems. I don't doubt that Linux is better when it works - my issue is merely that it's peripheral support needs to mature before it can seriously break the Windows stranglehold.
 
Crispy said:
All of them, AFAIK. I'm just going by what I read, mind - "ATI refuses to open drivers" that sort of thing. And my experience bears this out when I tried running ubuntu last year. Couldn't get my resolution up, and couldn't enable TV-out.

More than just games for 3D card - design, video acceleration etc.

IIRC, ATI are releasing some open source drivers for their cards. They're seperate from the proprietry ones though.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3108
 
Signal 11 said:
Well, running Windows executables on Linux is a different issue from hardware support -- e.g. you wouldn't expect to run Macintosh executables on Windows. However there are some options, cedega seems to be the most highly recommended. There's some information about it and the other options here.

Sorry, your quite right, its not linux fault, but its the main reason that I wont switch on my desktop. However when it just works when you install, then I'd be intrested in putting on my laptop which is looking rather long in the tooth.
 
Signal 11 said:
No, I just buy hardware that's supported by the software I intend to use.
Well, maybe we've been spoilt by the wide driver support in Windows, but I really can't see the industry moving away from that position now we're there ...
 
Signal 11 said:
Are you finally going to give us an example then?
An example of what? Is the driver support, particularly of wireless cards, between Linux and Windows really in question?

It's no good the Linux community going "yeah, but it's just better cos the kernel works on a pocket calculator and a supercomputer", because your average user will go "well, it doesn't work out the box on my PC so thanks but no thanks".

Maybe what's needed is a concerted effort by the Linux community in getting manufacturers to simultaneously release drivers for all platforms - eventually they'll get the message ...
 
I'll tell you one thing which Linux _is_ bad on, and you won't find a lot of people disagreeing - sound architecture. It's bollocks. Not so much the driver situation but that there's no bloody integration between, what, four or so different systems, all used by various different programs and WMs?

I say this as somebody who has been trying for fucking ages to get Ubuntu working with a bog-standard sound card, Shuttle SN25P. Does it work with anything? Does it bollocks. It's something that really needs to be sorted out.
 
By the way, if anyone wants to suggest anything... maybe I should start a thread.

Perfectly happy with the rest of it mind you.
 
Crispy said:
And yes, it's exactly a chicken and egg scenario, which is why Linux makes the most sense on a controlled hardware platform, where all drivers can be provided and conflicts resolved before it gets into the hands of users. Which is exactly what mac OS X does.
And the Eee. All the hardware setup you need has already been done, and if you balls it up you can just reset the entire OS. Never had a moment's problem with the wifi there.
 
oh and GTK and Gnome should really merge, or one should admit defeat. The continued existence of two seperate user interfaces really baffles me.
 
Back
Top Bottom