Signal 11
also programmed for conversational english
Without details there's little anyone can do to help.Global_Stoner said:it didn't detect my sound card or wifi card, couldn't play my media files or run my screen at its maximum resolution.

Without details there's little anyone can do to help.Global_Stoner said:it didn't detect my sound card or wifi card, couldn't play my media files or run my screen at its maximum resolution.

Signal 11 said:Without details there's little anyone can do to help.![]()
Mostly it's manufacturers. MS does generic drivers, and probably tweaks others.Global_Stoner said:Genuine question, do all the drivers that come with xp get supplied by the manufacturers to MS for the install CD of windows or how does it know what everything is?
They don't need to do it themselves.gnoriac said:Still, can't blame them avoiding extra expense when the market's not that big.
Desktop Linux needs drivers. Right? Of course. So why is Novell's Greg Kroah-Hartman, a Linux kernel developer and head of the Linux Driver Project, having to ask people to tell him about devices that need drivers?
[...]
He also wondered if the problem of Linux device drivers has been overstated: "I don't currently know of any common piece of hardware in use today that is not supported on Linux. And since these vendors do not know, and I don't, I'm asking the world to help out," he said.
[...]
So if you want a specific device that doesn't work on Linux to be properly supported on Linux, Kroah-Hartman would appreciate it if you would mark up the project's Drivers Needed wiki page with the details. Or, for that matter, he encourages you to just e-mail him with your suggestion.
All of them, AFAIK. I'm just going by what I read, mind - "ATI refuses to open drivers" that sort of thing. And my experience bears this out when I tried running ubuntu last year. Couldn't get my resolution up, and couldn't enable TV-out.Signal 11 said:Which ones?
Why wouldn't you be able to play games?Global_Stoner said:If you can't play games, then what does it matter if you can't get drivers for your 3D card
I have an NVidia card in this machine and 3D support is working fine using the proprietary driver from NVidia. I wouldn't get another one though now that intel's graphics hardware is properly supported with open source drivers.Global_Stoner said:To be fair these are the only drivers I installed on my PC, but thats because I think you get better performance with proper Nvidia ones.
Crispy said:"ATI refuses to open drivers" that sort of thing. And my experience bears this out when I tried running ubuntu last year. Couldn't get my resolution up, and couldn't enable TV-out.
More than just games for 3D card - design, video acceleration etc.
http://ati.amd.com/products/catalyst/linux.htmlQ1: What features are provided by the ATI Proprietary Linux Driver?
A1: The ATI Proprietary Linux driver currently provides hardware acceleration for 3D graphics and video playback. It also includes support for dual displays and TV Output.
Q2: Which ATI graphics cards can use this driver?
A2: The ATI Proprietary Linux driver currently supports Radeon 8500 and later AGP or PCI Express graphics products, as well as ATI FireGL 8700 and later products. We do not currently plan to include support for any products earlier than this. Drivers for earlier products should already be available from the DRI Project or Utah-GLX project.
Signal 11 said:Why wouldn't you be able to play games?
I have to use XP for work and it's nothing but grief, in daily use, not just in the one-off install/config process. TBF though that's just like Windows users experience when they try Linux -- it's down to what you're used to.fortyplus said:I'd save time and loads of grief if I used XP.

Well, running Windows executables on Linux is a different issue from hardware support -- e.g. you wouldn't expect to run Macintosh executables on Windows. However there are some options, cedega seems to be the most highly recommended. There's some information about it and the other options here.Global_Stoner said:Didn't think they were available. At the moment I'm playing Crysis, CoD 4, Civ 4, Far Cry and Eve. I know Eve has just got linux client, but I thought the rest of them were windows only titles.
You must be very lucky there seems to be quite a few on this thread alone which have had problems. I don't doubt that Linux is better when it works - my issue is merely that it's peripheral support needs to mature before it can seriously break the Windows stranglehold.Signal 11 said:I've never had any hardware that wasn't supported, in over 10 years. I'm sure it is annoying when you have bought hardware for Windows and find that Linux doesn't support it, but whatever it is that the hardware does, you can get one that is supported IME.
Crispy said:All of them, AFAIK. I'm just going by what I read, mind - "ATI refuses to open drivers" that sort of thing. And my experience bears this out when I tried running ubuntu last year. Couldn't get my resolution up, and couldn't enable TV-out.
More than just games for 3D card - design, video acceleration etc.
Signal 11 said:Well, running Windows executables on Linux is a different issue from hardware support -- e.g. you wouldn't expect to run Macintosh executables on Windows. However there are some options, cedega seems to be the most highly recommended. There's some information about it and the other options here.
No, I just buy hardware that's supported by the software I intend to use.Magneze said:You must be very lucky
Well, maybe we've been spoilt by the wide driver support in Windows, but I really can't see the industry moving away from that position now we're there ...Signal 11 said:No, I just buy hardware that's supported by the software I intend to use.
Are you finally going to give us an example then?Magneze said:Well, maybe we've been spoilt by the wide driver support in Windows
An example of what? Is the driver support, particularly of wireless cards, between Linux and Windows really in question?Signal 11 said:Are you finally going to give us an example then?
And the Eee. All the hardware setup you need has already been done, and if you balls it up you can just reset the entire OS. Never had a moment's problem with the wifi there.Crispy said:And yes, it's exactly a chicken and egg scenario, which is why Linux makes the most sense on a controlled hardware platform, where all drivers can be provided and conflicts resolved before it gets into the hands of users. Which is exactly what mac OS X does.