gunneradt said:yes but the ref didn't see it. He was not even going to bring out a yellow until Ronaldo got involved.
Still a cunt for stamping on someones bollocks though, whatever the ref did or did not see.
Rooney = cunt
Ronaldo = cocksucker
gunneradt said:yes but the ref didn't see it. He was not even going to bring out a yellow until Ronaldo got involved.
The ref was about 6 inches away.gunneradt said:yes but the ref didn't see it. He was not even going to bring out a yellow until Ronaldo got involved.
Donna Ferentes said:Of course, it's inconceivable that Ronaldo was genuinely outraged that some thug had stamped on a team-mate's knackers....
Especially when one considers where he's allowed to make a very decent living.Donna Ferentes said:Of course, it's inconceivable that Ronaldo was genuinely outraged that some thug had stamped on a team-mate's knackers....
In my experience, when people see their team-mates horrifically fouled, their outrage is genuine - and this is so even though they're not similarly outraged when the boot is on the other knackers.Dubversion said:To be fair, while I think Rooney did deserve to be sent off (even if the ref didn't see the incident and got it wrong!) I didn't see any outrage on Ronaldo's part, just sheer opportunism.
Donna Ferentes said:In my experience, when people see their team-mates horrifically fouled, their outrage is genuine - and this is so even though they're not similarly outraged when the boot is on the other knackers.
Mr Retro said:"So we have our pantomime villain. He's a pretty boy, he's foreign, he's cunning and conniving. He's perfect. But as always, millions of distraught England fans have fingered the wrong man in Cristiano Ronaldo. If you take away all the bluster and barely suppressed xenophobia, there are are only two people to blame for the incident that will define England's exit: Wayne Rooney and, to a lesser extent, the referee Horatio Elizondo."
Read the rest here by Rob Smyth
In the sense that the axe "caught" Anne Boleyn's neck?Buds and Spawn said:It looks like Rooney's heel caught the Portugese player in his lower abdomen / upper groin.
In the sense that the pain and effect are v. different.Donna Ferentes said:In the sense that the axe "caught" Anne Boleyn's neck?

Savage Henry said:I agree . Rooney deserved to go and no matter how much of a twat Ronaldo is , the fact remains England could have scored after Rooney had been sent off but they didn't . If you don't take your chances then don't blame the opposition if you lose !
Bomber said:Prior to the stamping incident [for which I agree Rooney was rightly sent off] does anyone not think that Rooney should have been awarded a foul for having two Portugese players trying to drag him down? Imagine if Ronaldo had been in that situation? Would he have stayed up and fought for the ball or dived and rolled around like the cheating cunt he is ? Time to decide, is Footy a contact sport or do we go down the basketball route, make your mind up because if it's the latter I need to find myself another sport to follow!
kanda said:It does actually look like the ref blew for a foul on Rooney before he stamped on him.
Kanda said:It does actually look like the ref blew for a foul on Rooney before he stamped on him.
Buds and Spawn said:It's hard to tell from the footage if Rooney's stamp was intentional - but what I know for sure is that if you get your testicles stamped on then you will be incapacitated for some time. It looks like Rooney's heel caught the Portugese player in his lower abdomen / upper groin. So enough of talk about knackers / nads etc..