editor said:FFS: WoW hasn't even posted on this thread.
![]()
![]()
But he started a new one on the same topic.
editor said:FFS: WoW hasn't even posted on this thread.
![]()
![]()
Donna Ferentes said:Talking of Clevedon, did I not read in Private Eye that the hotel next to the pier accidentally burned down?

William of Walworth said:Apologies DF -- I missed this thread this morning and started another one![]()
![]()
oryx said:Very pleased so far with York's start to the season. McEwan really does seem to be turning the club round (on the pitch, at least). I just hope that this is the season they manage to climb out of the Conference at last.

), without Oxford being particularly brilliant themselves 
William of Walworth said:Erm ... not on yesterday's sorry performance from York, I'm afraid, Oryx!
Oxford pissed all over York throughout yesterday's match (I was there), without Oxford being particularly brilliant themselves
![]()
nonamenopackdrill said:Did you?
<jaw drops>
William of Walworth said:Leave it -- I genuinely didn't see this one. Would be delighted to have both threads effectlvely merged by having the other one locked,. Will alert the mods later.
nonamenopackdrill said:Was that why you started a new thread - to boast that you'd gone to a game this year?
William of Walworth said:Kindly stop being a stirrer. Thanks. It was a genuine mistake for me to miss this thread, and I've apologised. I wanted to talk about Conference stuff (and how my team are doing well in a division for once as well, admittedly).
I'd been to a match yes, and was thus qualified to comment ...
nonamenopackdrill said:Well done.
Why is it that you label everyone who disagrees with you a stirrer? How am I stirring? I was just pointing out that you did exactly what you reported me for doing.
)-- only those who actually are, and not because they're disagreeing with me either. It's pretty clear you were blatantly stirring, in both this and the other thread. Ludicrous to pretend otherwise.Donna Ferentes said:To give it a name I have never used and never will.
William of Walworth said:Do you have to be so consistently unpleasant?
You seriously don't give a shit how nasty you make yourself look when you get like this, do you?
I don't term 'everyone' who disagrees with me a stirrer (straight out of the manual, that old cobweb)-- only those who actually are, and not because they're disagreeing with me either. It's pretty clear you were blatantly stirring, in both this and the other thread. Ludicrous to pretend otherwise.
nonamenopackdrill said:OK William, so were you stirring on the thread(s) about Glastonbury or is that different because it was you?



I've just deleted it.William of Walworth said:I have now reported the other (duplicate) Conference thread to the mods -- and requested that they bin it or lock it. (Should have done this yesterday).
Donna Ferentes said:God's sake man, can't you leave it?
William of Walworth said:On topic and weird fact : not a single player in the twelve scorers in the Conference plays for Oxford United![]()
William of Walworth said:This is blatant misrepresentation. The difference is obvious -- the other Glasto thread was a purposeless duplicate, started by you in full knowledge that the other one had been established.
I have now reported the other (duplicate) Conference thread to the mods -- and requested that they bin it or lock it. (Should have done this yesterday).
As I already said, I started the other Conference thread yesterday morning having genuinely not seen this one. Your refusal to believe me on this says acres about you. As does your apparant contentment with going out of your way to be publicly sneery and unpleasant with no necessity for it.
Donna Ferentes said:To be honest, if there's any more pointless bickering on here I'l lask the mods to delete this thread as well.
No last words. Please.
