Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Less meat could cut climate costs by $20 trillion (!) until 2050

gET A GRIP, GARF
tURN OFF CAPSLOCK, CRISPY
lolz calm down dear...

I'm merely asking why eveyrt hread that danny and i pretty much interact on at some poitn he makes a reading jibe and asking why...

what's his prejudice against dyselxics?

why doe she continually feel the need to ask if they've read something...

funny really i don't call someone a nigger and get banned for sayign the word nigger but not calling some it where as other far more offensive attacks on peoples disablities which are directed at people are entirely ignored...

and no i haven't reported it should i need to when there's a mod on the thread but they decide it's not discrimintory conversation but that the victim should just get a grip...

lolz your funny..
 
lolz calm down dear...

I'm merely asking why eveyrt hread that danny and i pretty much interact on at some poitn he makes a reading jibe and asking why...

what's his prejudice against dyselxics?

why doe she continually feel the need to ask if they've read something.
wind your neck in garf, danny was merely suggesting that this thread needn't be a rehash of old arguements if you and others actually took the time to take a look at the new research linked to in the OP, then we could maybe discuss the findings of the research...

or should we just have a tick list of topics that we've now officially done, and never need to discuss again regardless of any potentially interesting new research on the subject?
 
wind your neck in garf, danny was merely suggesting that this thread needn't be a rehash of old arguements if you and others actually took the time to take a look at the new research linked to in the OP, then we could maybe discuss the findings of the research...

or should we just have a tick list of topics that we've now officially done, and never need to discuss again regardless of any potentially interesting new research on the subject?
thing is there can't be any real discussion on this as it's such a polemic people have drawn their battle lines...

i honestly don't think it's a topic which will have any out come other than what i've described above...

and there's so much and so many conflicting bits of informaiton not to mention that the entire planet moving to a predominantly veritarian diet would have as great and impact as animall eating makes it a silly discussion...

just liek there's subjects you wouldn't want to have discussions about with your mum and dad cos it'll end in greif for everone this subject is also one of those topics....

doens't change dannys habit of asking a dylexic if they can read the thread, in faux innocence....
 
I'm merely asking why eveyrt hread that danny and i pretty much interact on at some poitn he makes a reading jibe and asking why...
Well, first of all, that isn't true. And secondly, the point is, this thread was not going the way you said all these threads went. Of course it's bolloxed up now, thanks to your attention-seeking.
 
Well, first of all, that isn't true. And secondly, the point is, this thread was not going the way you said all these threads went. Of course it's bolloxed up now, thanks to your attention-seeking.
no thanks to once again your attacks on the disablled...

dont' make prejudsical comments and the upstart cripples wont' take offence at your words... eh?

classic blame the victim approach btw

good one...

the appropreate response should have been sorry didn't mean it like that (if you didn't but you did so you could have at least attempted a nobel lie) and retracted it instead you re-enforced your postition and further attacked entrenched yourself...

me complaining about your comment is attention seeking...

see now we come to the heart of the matter are those pesky coloured being attention seeking taking about racism, how about those daft bitches which talk abotu equality are they attention seeking...

fucking clueless prick you really are...

even us mentals can see if your in a hole stop digging why can't you...
 
Look, Fauntleroy, just because Daddy wouldn't buy you the thread doesn't mean you have to bollox it up for the rest of us.
 
Look, Fauntleroy, just because Daddy wouldn't buy you the thread doesn't mean you have to bollox it up for the rest of us.
ah right moved away from the disablity bashign now to the class snobbery angle loving your work...

tell me jock, what's so fucking great about being in poverty precisely which makes you think there's some kind og dulce est decorum est in being poor...


moreover why is it you feel you need to be better than me at something, indeed judging by your scattershot approach here it's anything...

really are oyu that inadiquate?
 
Telling someone to read the thread isn't an attack on the disabled, imo.
normally no but danny does it repeatdly to get at the dyslexic it's not the first time he's 'innocently' made remarks... nor i suspect will it be the last...
 
Go and have a chamomile tea or something. Then come back and address the issues.

Oh, and an apology would be nice. I've been active in the disability movement for years, and don't appreciate your silly accusations.
 
reality<----------------------------------------------------------------------------->GarfieldLeChat
ah so there's a comment to be had then abotu the thread topic or about dannys disablled bashing or are you simply boosting your post count by adding into the bunfight and the obvious then siding with the sentiment of class snobbery and disablled bashing...

see it's only for your ego that you've borthered posting at all as you've added nothing to the thread... which is it ego or post count....
 
Go and have a chamomile tea or something. Then come back and address the issues.

Oh, and an apology would be nice. I've been active in the disability movement for years, and don't appreciate your silly accusations.
right after your apology for your continue comments...

is it acceptable to say to someone you know is dyslexic have you read something...

cos if you think it is danny then ihave to question if you well meaning involvement with disablites for some time has been a success because of your involvement or inspite or it...

you really don't get it...

and considereding the credentials you claim you really fucking should...
 
thing is there can't be any real discussion on this as it's such a polemic people have drawn their battle lines...

And they are very simple battle lines.

The carnivores are destroying the planet, so the vegetarians and the vegans will, sadly, have to EXECUTE EVERY LAST MOTHERFUCKING ONE OF THE FUCKERS.

And then tell the little bunnies how sad we were when we did it.

No discussion needed.
 
And they are very simple battle lines.

The carnivores are destroying the planet, so the vegetarians and the vegans will, sadly, have to EXECUTE EVERY LAST MOTHERFUCKING ONE OF THE FUCKERS.

And then tell the little bunnies how sad we were when we did it.

No discussion needed.

:cool:
i'm going with this :)
 
Yes it is. Of course it is.

Yes it is, next question.

I reckon so.
So 3 more people who actively dscriminate and see no issue with it...
Put it this way: what do you come here to do?

dicuss, sometimes robutsly, btu although i'm an aggro cunt usually it's a reactive aggression rathr than a proactive one in otherwords i'm aggro at people who're alrady being aggro...

I'll ask you again do you think it's acceptable to say so someone with dyslexica can you read something?

particlarlly when my previous posts were cleary on topic, all be not to you liking and had not singlled out anyone for anything other than to say this will go well and we've done this to death...

and of coruse making the poitn about reflected heat that the 'argument' for vegitation based farming was flawed when the methods employed to feed the world would lead to more animal slaughter only not big ones like cows or pigs but hedge row animals soil based animals and so on....

not one of these points did you choose to pick up on danny only to abuse me about my disablity....

see i was on topic it was you with your attack which forced a reaction, because it's not ok to discriminate against others based on their abilites as a leading light in disablity campagining you should already know this but still couldn't engauge the posters points but decided on the usual cheap disabbled bashign schitck you do when you feel superior to others....

I fucking hope that you aren't as disconnected and alineated from those people with disablities you are involved with day to day, heavens only knows what they must think if you are that monumentally discrimintory insensative daily...

for the record highlight and dismissing someones opnion based on their disablity is discriminatory...

your comments were offensive, which of course you knew because they were designed to offend...

so purrrlease, get over your self you've been called on your little game so stop it...
 
And they are very simple battle lines.

The carnivores are destroying the planet, so the vegetarians and the vegans will, sadly, have to EXECUTE EVERY LAST MOTHERFUCKING ONE OF THE FUCKERS.

And then tell the little bunnies how sad we were when we did it.

No discussion needed.

i think as it happens that massive argicorp and big business is killing the plaent but that there'd be little wrong in eatting meat you'd grown yourself...

that being siad why are you goign to kill lions?

or did you only mean human carnivors... :p
 
so purrrlease, get over your self you've been called on your little game so stop it...
You're being ridiculous. You know exactly what was meant: you had pre-judged how you thought the argument would run, and I was asking you to look and see that this thread was not running that way.

And, yes, you come here to discuss. To engage in threads. And in order to do that, you need to find out what is being discussed, and how the discussion is going. That's what I was asking you to do.

Of course, the thread's trashed now. Cheers.
 
Back
Top Bottom