Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Lambeth Council and operation black vote

TeeJay said:
So MrBC - are you even going to tell us how this 98% registration figure was calculated?

I can guess since MrBC seems to be working off the official council figures, as am I. 98% is comparing the actual number of people on the electoral roll to the projected total that the council is using. In other words it applies a best guess of population trends for Lambeth to the latest census figures (for 2001). You can't really argue with the number on the roll so if you think there's under - registration you must think there is a systematic problem with either a) the census figure or b) the trend estimate - and you must have your own alternative estimate that has a good reason for being better than these.
 
Bob said:
I can guess since MrBC seems to be working off the official council figures, as am I. 98% is comparing the actual number of people on the electoral roll to the projected total that the council is using. In other words it applies a best guess of population trends for Lambeth to the latest census figures (for 2001). You can't really argue with the number on the roll so if you think there's under - registration you must think there is a systematic problem with either a) the census figure or b) the trend estimate - and you must have your own alternative estimate that has a good reason for being better than these.
I was out on Saturday and knocked on maybe 80 front doors. This street had far better registration than some parts of Lambeth I have been to in the past and it didn't meet your 98% figure. I don't have any alternative figure for the total population of Lambeth, but this doesn't stop me from saying that anyone believing that registration is 98% is taking rubbish and maybe doesn't go anywhere near actual front doors or spend any time actually talking to people at addresses in Lambeth.

There were several ways in which the electoral roll for this street was in error: firstly there were extra people living at many of the addresses - people who were not on the roll (and maybe not on the census either - but since the census doesn't release figures at this level for 100 years there is no way I can check this). Secondly there were several properties that had people listed but which were in fact empty either because they had moved or because it was being gutted and refurbished. In several cases neighbours confirmed to me that these people no longer lived there. Both of these factors push the figures in the same direction: showing a higher registration rate than there is in reality.
 
Just seen this...
Lambeth Press Release said:
Reminder service targets young voters
03 March 2006

The London Borough of Lambeth has launched a new service aimed at increasing Electoral Registration and voter turnout - Election Alarm Clock.

Election Alarm Clock is an automated email and SMS reminder service designed to ensure citizens are reminded of key dates in the election calendar. People sign up to the service at www.electionalarmclock.com/lambeth, and are then sent a series of regular emails and text messages reminding them of the deadlines for electoral registration, postal vote registration and election day. The pilot service will operate from March until May 2006.

The service has been developed in response to recent Electoral Commission research showing that electoral registration is particularly low amongst transient voters, typically young people living in urban areas. According to this research, around 3.5 million people are not signed up to the register, and up to one in four 18 to 24 year olds are not registered in London boroughs.

The service is being piloted in Lambeth with a national version of the service available at the same time.

The project has been jointly funded by the Electoral Commission's New Initiatives Fund, and the e-democracy company Delib.

To promote the service, a web-based viral marketing campaign has been launched around a game called "Elejumper" to drive people to the website. In addition, postcards marketing the service will be distributed at public venues around the borough.

Cllr Ashley Lumsden, Executive Member for Finance said "We've developed Election Alarm Clock as a simple way for Local Authorities to help increase electoral registration and turnout amongst hard-to-reach groups. “

Chris Quigley, Delib Director adds “Using SMS and email reminders is a really simple yet effective way of getting messages out to young people in a targeted way."

The website can be accessed by visiting: www.electionalarmclock.com/lambeth

Anyone encountered any viral marketing so far?
 
Kid_Eternity said:
Great move Lambeth with just ten days to go before deadline you decide to get your arse in gear... :rolleyes:

Looks as though this has been in train for some time - but I do agree this ought to have launched weeks ago to have any real effect on voter registration as well as to try and increase turnout/postal voting!
 
"The London Borough of Lambeth has launched a new service aimed at increasing Electoral Registration and voter turnout ... The project has been jointly funded by the Electoral Commission's New Initiatives Fund, and the e-democracy company Delib."

So what exactly has been Lambeth's contribution to this, apart from having other people come and help sort out their fuck-ups as per usual? Have they done anything at all towards the project apart from "allowing" the name Lambeth to be stuck on it in small letters at the bottom?

I wonder why Lambeth was picked if it is really true that there is "no problem" and that "98%" of eligable voters are already registered as supposedly claimed by the head of Lambeth Electoral Services?
 
"The London Borough of Lambeth has launched a new service aimed at increasing Electoral Registration and voter turnout ... The project has been jointly funded by the Electoral Commission's New Initiatives Fund, and the e-democracy company Delib."

So what exactly has been Lambeth's contribution to this, apart from having other people come and help sort out their fuck-ups as per usual? Have they done anything at all towards the project apart from "allowing" the name Lambeth to be stuck on it in small letters at the bottom?

I wonder why Lambeth was picked if it is really true that there is "no problem" and that "98%" of eligable voters are already registered as supposedly claimed by the head of Lambeth Electoral Services?

Don't have to be on the electoral register to vote. I'm not and I always vote, and what's more my party always gets a majority. I vote every time for the 'Nobody Party'. Vote this way everybody and watch 'em tremble!

And by the way. Where do we vote in the referendum on Brixton getting its independence from Lambeth?
 
What will our flag look like?

slflagbasic.png


via Free South London.
 
Wow, not sure I like the purple bit, but otherwise that's a great flag!

So, did lots of people register to vote in Lambeth back in the year whatever?
 
Back
Top Bottom