nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Powerbase has an article on them.Apparently it was found by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAAS).
Powerbase has an article on them.Apparently it was found by the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAAS).
Not something that most 15 year olds come out with though, is it?
She also tweeted that 'the Jews are so powerful in the US it's disgusting'.
Well no - but there is a bit of difference between "Labour councillor suspended from the party for tweeting that Hitler was the 'greatest man in history'", and "Labour councillor suspended from the party for tweeting that Hitler was the 'greatest man in history', when she was fifteen".

The Jewish Chronicle has been going mad lately trying to present Corbyn and co as antisemtic, or not worthy of our trust, but I really can't see it myself. I agree it just seems to be a few weirdos on Twitter, and I suspect other parties have just as many such twats in their rank.
I do think there is sometimes a problem with antisemitism on the hard left, with people sometimes getting into bed with groups that have dodgy views when they have a mutual campaigning area, but I don't think it is a problem of the parliamentary Labour party.
is the classic.
most palestenians dont really care much for the diffrence between Israeli and Jew understanably
.
.The Jewish Chronicle has been going mad lately trying to present Corbyn and co as antisemtic, or not worthy of our trust, but I really can't see it myself. I agree it just seems to be a few weirdos on Twitter, and I suspect other parties have just as many such twats in their rank.
I do think there is sometimes a problem with antisemitism on the hard left, with people sometimes getting into bed with groups that have dodgy views when they have a mutual campaigning area, but I don't think it is a problem of the parliamentary Labour party.
Tbh, I think it's over-exaggerated. I can't say I've met any anti-Semites on the so-called 'hard left'. However, I encounter plenty of anti-Semites who are Kippers and Zeitgeist types, all of whom flock to comments threads on newspaper websites and share their ugly views with fellow nut-jobs on Twitter.I do think there is sometimes a problem with antisemitism on the hard left, with people sometimes getting into bed with groups that have dodgy views when they have a mutual campaigning area, but I don't think it is a problem of the parliamentary Labour party.
Indeed and it's become much worse since Stephen Pollard became its editor. BBC Breakfast presenters 'Simpering' Sian Williams and Bill 'Old Etonian' Turnbull allowed Pollard to shout down and talk over Ken Loach during a live studio 'discussion' in the days before the Iraq invasion. I'll never forget that.The JC is an awful paper and shouldn't be taken very seriously. It is daily mailesque in its hysteria.
I wish people did ignore it - it's grist to the mill of certain types in the US (like my one of my husband's uncles) who hear about the sorts of things it says and really seem to believe that the UK/Europe is some kind of Islamic state that's one step away fro another Kristallnacht, whereas it is actually Muslims whose freedoms and rights are under threat.
In my (limited) experience the few Palestinian people i've come across in the uk have been very careful and reasonable in the language and arguments - including when speaking at Palestine solidarity rallys. Its always been middle class white english people or the occasional muslim with a background nowhere near the region, who have used zionist/israeli/jewish interchangably, the "we are all hezbollah" bollox, or come out with more grossly anti-semitic stuff.The fuckwit "who came out we are all hezbollah"is the classic.
Most of the middle east has the protocols of elders of zion for salemost palestenians dont really care much for the diffrence between Israeli and Jew understanably
.
So any contact with any palestinian or arab group is going to run into people who think the only good jew is a dead jew.
In my (limited) experience the few Palestinian people i've come across in the uk have been very careful and reasonable in the language and arguments - including when speaking at Palestine solidarity rallys.
I know that this is certainly not indicative of the thoughts of every Palestinian alive today, but still not someone who was "very careful in their language and arguments".There was a big furore surrounding Cambridge Momentum regarding such people though.They're very likely - these types - to not be labour members, in fact to hate labour. Possibly for reasons not far removed from anti-semitism
I bet they were from the part that aren't labour members though.There was a big furore surrounding Cambridge Momentum regarding such people though.
I bet they were from the part that aren't labour members though.

That's exactly what this failed attempt is isn't it?If so, is it any wonder why Momentum tends to be very wary at best, hostile at worst to any other left organisations other than the Labour Party?
Thing is, in an organisation with as many members as the Labour Party (and indeed the left within the Labour Party, which probably has more people in it than the rest of the left put together), there will be unfortunately be a a few dodgy people trying to creep in (as is true of any campaign or movement sadly) - and if the Labour left is not careful the Blairites will seize on any chance to discredit them.
isn't Momentum basically all the other groups (minus sp and swp) pretending to be labour?
The fuckwit "who came out we are all hezbollah"is the classic.
Most of the middle east has the protocols of elders of zion for salemost palestenians dont really care much for the diffrence between Israeli and Jew understanably
.
So any contact with any palestinian or arab group is going to run into people who think the only good jew is a dead jew.
Well the SWP took their time dissociating with Gilad Atzmon, even when evidence of how virulently anti-Semitic he is started mounting up.Fuckwits, there were plenty more than one, i can recall senior SWP members excusing them as well, saying that they are oppressed so do bad things, thats the WAAH lot, btw.
The NUS have elected a new President, Malia Bouattia, who has recently been accused of anti-Semitism. Again, it seems as though her strong anti-Zionist views have caused concern among some (she once wrote that 'The University of Birmingham is something of a Zionist outpost in British Higher Education'). Her critics have also raised concerns that she's close to the anti-Semitic Muslim Public Affairs Committee, primarily because she once wrote 'thank you' on Facebook in response to a supportive message from its spokesperson. She's obviously denied these accusations, and claimed that she is only anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitic.
A senior representative of a controversial UK Muslim group, banned from many UK campuses due to their spreading of anti-Semitic propaganda, has described an initiative led by Jewish university society presidents as indicative of a wider “Zio lobby”.
In a Facebook status posted on Saturday, Raza Nadim, spokesman for the London-based Muslim Public Affairs Council, which purports to “focus on non-violent jihad”, hit out against the “power of the Zio lobby”.
Nadim finishes his diatribe with this lovely comment showing his apparent true beliefs, “(Also, just to let the Zios know who check out my FB and Twitter – I’m not fazed at all about this – I’m used to your tactics and every time you mention me or MPACUK it proves that we’re doing something right. If anything, it’s made me hate you even more and criticise Israel even more. You really shouldn’t poke a tiger, you terrorist-sympathising p×××ks)”.
AntiSemitism Watch
MPACUK even posted “Take your holocaust, roll it nice and tight and shove it up your (be
creative)!” on their Facebook page in 2013.
Does the National Union of Students believe inclusivity will be delivered by prospective president?
15th April 2016 Leave a comment
The UK National Union of Students (NUS) has often shown itself incapable of providing the type of inclusive governance or leadership that allows all views and beliefs to flourish or feel welcomed. Jewish students have, in particular, experienced the sense of isolation the actions and decisions of the NUS generates.
As the troubled organisation staggers towards its annual conference next week, Jewish students have the unhappy prospect of a potential new president who is currently facing accusations of “anti-Semitism” ahead of her bid to become the organisation’s new leader.
Malia Bouattia, who presently serves as black students officer, has faced mounting criticism over an article she co-authored five years ago in which she described the University of Birmingham as “something of a Zionist outpost”, and for alleged links with an organisation currently blacklisted by the NUS.
She said on Thursday that her political views had been “misconstrued” by those accusing her of anti-Semitism.
An open letter addressed to Bouattia and signed by 56 Jewish society presidents, suggested that, “Describing large Jewish societies as a challenge is the politics of division and not solidarity which should be the case.”
The letter highlights a 2011 blog post, co-authored by Bouattia, which lists a large Jewish society among the challenges at Birmingham University.
“The University of Birmingham is something of a Zionist outpost,” the article read.
This prompted the open letter to ask: “Why do you see a large Jewish Society as a problem?”
Read the letter in full, here.
The letter goes on to allege that she held links with an organisation previously “no-platformed” by the NUS. The Muslim Public Affairs Committee UK (MPACUK) was banned by the NUS from university campuses in 2004 for anti-Semitic propaganda.
MPACUK used its website to promote the idea of a worldwide Zionist conspiracy, and included the reproduction of articles originally published on neo-Nazi and Holocaust denial websites.
MPACUK even posted “Take your holocaust, roll it nice and tight and shove it up your (be
creative)!” on their Facebook page in 2013.
Bouattia further stoked controversy in 2014 when she railed against a motion which condemned the so-called Islamic State.
Bouattia used her Facebook campaign page to post an open response to the Jewish students’ letter.
She wrote: “I do not now, nor did I five years ago when I contributed to the article cited in your letter, see a large Jewish Society on campus as a problem.
“I want to be clear that for me to take issue with Zionist politics, is not me taking issue with being Jewish.
She continued: “I am deeply concerned that my faith and political views are being misconstrued and used as an opportunity to falsely accuse me of antisemitism, despite my work and dedication to liberation, equality and inclusion saying otherwise.”
Yet the Jewish student society presidents letter also highlighted how, “Just recently you explained at an event at SOAS that the government Prevent strategy is the result of a so-called ‘Zionist lobby’. By peddling these conspiracy theories to student audiences we are concerned that you are creating an element of suspicion towards Jewish students on campus.”
The NUS said on Thursday it would not comment on the open letter because “it is too close to the election,” taking place in Brighton next Wednesday.
The Union of Jewish Students (UJS) said: “Jewish students are rightly outraged when they see a candidate for NUS president who sees their Jewish Societies as a threat.
“Jewish students are rightly scared when they see a candidate associating themselves with organisations with a history of antisemitism and they are once again used as an easy target for conspiracy theories.”