ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
detective-boy said:In my experience the kids aren't particularly worried about the existence of proper powers - it's the attitude of the officers doing the stopping which makes all the difference.
And it is definitely something which different parts of the community view in very different ways - sadly it has almost totemic significance to the black community now.
Having been stopped under SUS more times than I care to think about in my youth, it had a fairly "totemic significance" in the mixed working class neighbourhoods I grew up in too. The obvious (to teenage working class males of the time, that is) thing was that there was a "heirarchy of oppression" operated by many coppers in SW London, which ran something like;
Black, male, w/c or m/c, in or out of own locale - definite stop, w/ loads of attitude and snidery from the coppers.
White or Asian, male, w/c, in or out of own locale - almost definite stop, never as much attitude as black peers got.
White, male, m/c, in own locale - unlikely to be stopped. If stopped police servile.
White, male, m/c, out of own locale - unlikely to be stopped. If stopped police servile.
Perhaps the "attitude" problem on the part of the police was down to the (often mooted, never confirmed) perception by some political activists in SW London that certain police stations (Battersea Bridge Road and Streatham spring to mind) were "rubbish dumps" where the scum of the division were deposited. Perhaps it was just good old-fashioned contempt for the working classes. What I do know is that SUS wouldn't gave garnered such a bad rep if the officers on the ground had been a little more humane and a little less abusive.
