Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Kids harder to teach than 30 years ago? Is this why?

Jazzz said:
I don't this repeated personal insult is at all justified zed66. But we are so programmed to worship vaccination that this is what you receive should you dare question any aspect of the practise. Thank you for showing that.
I think it is entirely justified. I do not hold any position on the causal relationship between vaccinations and disease, or child behaviour, considering the jury to still be out.However on the basis of an unproven conjecture you would willingly risk the life of 300, 000 infants from whooping cough, expose new born babies to the risk of incurable Congenital rubella syndrome and if you are consistent in your loopery presumably believe that 300-500,000 deaths a year from Tetanus doesn't merit an increase in the worldwide vaccination programme.

What does the name Edward Jenner mean to you?
 
Do you even accept that vaccinations can save lives?

Number of deaths between 1900-1977 from Smallpox- Estimated deaths 300,000,000. WHO declares eradication of Smallpox on 1977?

Why do you think this was possible?
 
Zed, you clearly know Jazz & his (ahem) interesting theories and his clearly stated policy on the possibility of him being wrong, so why are you wasting breath on debating with him?

Interesting to see that he's happy to trust the American Govt/FDA when it supports his crackpot theories, but not when it doesn't, like 9-11...
 
zed66 said:
I think it is entirely justified. I do not hold any position on the causal relationship between vaccinations and disease, or child behaviour, considering the jury to still be out.
I respect that view.

However on the basis of an unproven conjecture you would willingly risk the life of 300, 000 infants from whooping cough, expose new born babies to the risk of incurable Congenital rubella syndrome and if you are consistent in your loopery presumably believe that 300-500,000 deaths a year from Tetanus doesn't merit an increase in the worldwide vaccination programme.
On this thread the question isn't 'should the state insist on vaccination or not?', I am stating my views on what I think is responsible for a trend in children's devlopment. I will not tell anyone whether to vaccinate or not. What I am for is informed consent. That means the question of whether or not to vaccinated should be freely discussed and decisions lie with parents who will hopefully research the issue fully until they are satisfied with their choice.

However allow me to point out that Sweden, despite 'risking' the lives of its infants by banning pertussis vaccination finds itself on top of the league. So I would personally do what they do. And with the other vaccines too, yes, because I think that's the best way to be healthy - have a well fed immune system that is not tainted by vaccination. Pasteur relented on his deathbed that the terrain, and not the germ, was the crucial factor.

What does the name Edward Jenner mean to you?
Good question. I post this off the top of my head, without reference. We can check afterwards.

Edward Jenner, the 'father of vaccination', was a quack. He never passed a medical exam in his life, and was admitted to the Royal Society on some piece of nonsense about bird-keeping. However, he had an idea about vaccination, and somehow was able to receive handsome funding for it. He decided that cow-pox was a protection against smallpox and started making injections which I believe were taken from the arms of someone who had contracted cow-pox. Results were no better than chance despite any spin he could put on it, and several vets started pointing out that plenty of people had had both cow-pox and smallpox.

So, Jenner changed his idea. He decided that he would inject children not with cowpox, but 'horse-grease' - a lovely concoction composed from the pus of diseased horses' hooves. He declared this was the 'life-preserving fluid'. This extremely unethical experiment resulted in the deaths of those he injected and he was advised to abandon the idea or the whole thing would never take off.

So, he went back to arm-to-arm vaccinations. Put simply, it didn't work, and of course had fantastic risks because of the blood-sharing. However, the authorities decided it did. Vaccination was made compulsory in Britain and the colonies. The result was devastation with a vaccine that was extremely dangerous and did nothing to prevent smallpox. In Britain, we had our worst ever smallpox outbreaks fully fifteen years after the vaccine was enforced by law and these outbreaks dwarfed those prior to vaccination. The experience was same elsewhere - everywhere that had Jenner's vaccine suffered horrendous smallpox. Millions in Germany, the Phillipines. In India the experience was tragic; it was announced in the House of Commons that upwards of three million Indians died from smallpox all of whom had been vaccinated as it was strictly enforced, but that whenever sanitation was introduced smallpox disappeared without exception. Meanwhile, during the same period Australia, which had no smallpox vaccination, saw something like three deaths from the disease.

Here in the UK opinion turned against the smallpox vaccine and the law requiring it. Led by some doctors who were standing up to it, notably Dr. Hadwen, Public campaigning eventually won and no longer could the state force the shots.

As good sanitation arrived, and levels of vaccination dropped considerably, smallpox eventually ceased.

Perhaps a good measure as to how scientific early smallpox vaccination was is revealed by the fact that the virus in the vaccine was not cowpox!

How did I do?
 
Without reference: Before vaccination (by the way what do you think the etymology of the word vaccination is?), the process of variolation (after Smallpox Variola) was well documented. The process of variolation, or innoculation meant exposing a healthy person to live smallpox in small quantities. This was proved to be effective but unfortubnately had a 2% mortality rate. Treatment with later vaccines post Jenner still had a fatality rate, and was one one of the most dangerous vaccines in use in the 19th and 20th centuries. The death rate for smallpox vaccines was less than 1 in 1 000 000.

What do you think has happed to death rates from Poliomylitis over the last one hundred years?
 
zed66 said:
Simple question:

How many instances of Smallpox (minor or major) have there been on planet Earth since 1978?
I think none. This includes all the countries that never saw a single smallpox vaccine, which is nearly half of them.

However there have been outbreaks of monkey-pox in smallpox vaccinated countries, a condition which is clinically indistinguishable from smallox, and which the smallox vaccine is supposed to prevent.

Some of the last places to see the end of smallpox were Indian communities where the virus persisted despite vaccination to the hilt. It was only when isolation of cases was brought in that it went away. A director of the WHO programme declared that smallpox would have vanished anyway without vaccination although 'it just would have taken longer'.
 
Jazzz said:
As good sanitation arrived, and levels of vaccination dropped considerably, smallpox eventually ceased.
This may actually be the most singually factually inaccuarte statement I have ever seen on the internet.The eradiction of smallbox is entirely due to a deliberate process of vaccination, specifically the eradication process started by the WHO in 1967.

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/smallpox/en/

In 1967, when WHO launched an intensified plan to eradicate smallpox, the "ancient scourge" threatened 60% of the world's population, killed every fourth victim, scarred or blinded most survivors, and eluded any form of treatment.

Through the success of the global eradication campaign, smallpox was finally pushed back to the horn of Africa and then to a single last natural case, which occurred in Somalia in 1977. A fatal laboratory-acquired case occurred in the United Kingdom in 1978. The global eradication of smallpox was certified, based on intense verification activities in countries, by a commission of eminent scientists in December 1979 and subsequently endorsed by the World Health Assembly in 1980.
 
zed66 said:
This may actually be the most singually factually inaccuarte statement I have ever seen on the internet.The eradiction of smallbox is entirely due to a deliberate process of vaccination, specifically the eradication process started by the WHO in 1967.
I was referring to the UK epidemics and the discarding of Jenner's vaccine. I thought that was clear.

You may have noticed that in your link, no figures are offered for the efficacy of Jenner's vaccine. That's because it was an unmitigated disaster.

However the assertion that sanitation always beats smallpox is entirely true.

More later with links on stuff we don't agree on but I need some sleep now as I have to perform magic for my (fully vaccinated) nephew's birthday party tomorrow.
 
Jazzz said:
I was referring to the UK epidemics and the discarding of Jenner's vaccine. I thought that was clear.

You may have noticed that in your link, no figures are offered for the efficacy of Jenner's vaccine. That's because it was an unmitigated disaster.

However the assertion that sanitation always beats smallpox is entirely true.

More later with links on stuff we don't agree on but I need some sleep now as I have to perform magic for my (fully vaccinated) nephew's birthday party tomorrow.
You have been given prima facie evidence of possibly the single greatest medical advance in the history of mankind and still you are not willing to accept that not only can vaccination work, but it has worked.

Given the estimate of 300m deaths from Smallpox Variola in the 20th century thats 120, 000, 000 lives saved since 1978. Yet you claim this is due to improvements in sanitation, do you think sanitation in the third world miraculously improved between 1967-1978 to the extent that Smallpox was totally eradicated, for the first time in over 3000 years?

It isn't possible to have a two way discussion with you, as you have what I can only describe as a religious belief in your own unsubstantiated views.

I have given you concrete evidence of the ability of vaccination to save lives by the hundreds of millions.Smallpox is only one example amongst many.
 
brixtonvilla said:
Zed, you clearly know Jazz & his (ahem) interesting theories and his clearly stated policy on the possibility of him being wrong, so why are you wasting breath on debating with him?
Because I suffer from a form of Tourettes, when I see someone post something that is unmitigated bollocks I feel duty bound to tell them. :D
 
Let's have a source for this highly unlikely quote while you're there.
Originally Posted by Jazzz
A director of the WHO programme declared that smallpox would have vanished anyway without vaccination although 'it just would have taken longer'.
 
Fucking load of crap - and unsurprising culminating in the Jazzz "The Great Gulliblo" Magician Extrordinaire doing a disappearing act - right at the point in the thread where he has to provide evidence for his "odd" ideas .... seen it all before - Huntley Is Innocent, right??

:rolleyes:
 
i totally believe kids should fear adults because if they don't they'll get a slap round the ear

not beatings, just a little cliip round the ear will do em good

respect kids and all that, but they are kids at the end of the day
 
pk said:
Fucking load of crap - and unsurprising culminating in the Jazzz "The Great Gulliblo" Magician Extrordinaire doing a disappearing act - right at the point in the thread where he has to provide evidence for his "odd" ideas .... seen it all before - Huntley Is Innocent, right??

:rolleyes:

Don't forget 7/7 as a "black op", with the edifying sight of Jazz trying to tell an eyewitness (in his overly polite, sanctimonious, patronising way, as always) that they were wrong in what they saw.

Said it before & I'll say it again; he's a fucking troll. Full of bullshit, thread-derailing opinions backed up by the flimsiest of evidence, a smug "well-you-can't-disprove-it-can-you" attitude, and an utter unwillingness to ever concede in the face of overwhelming evidence. If you want to waste bandwidth on the pillock Zed, knock yourself out. But you're wasting your breath...
 
Jazzz said:
You can read Dr Mack's contribution here. http://www.vaclib.org/news/drmacks.htm

I'm not too impressed with the general style of discussion here.

Brixton Villa - that's totally not true.
No, not good enough, your original quote was
Originally Posted by Jazzz
A director of the WHO programme declared that smallpox would have vanished anyway without vaccination although 'it just would have taken longer'.

If you had bothered to read the first line of the link you had just posted up (has it ever actually occurred to you to read any of the infinite number of links you cite as evidence?) you would see this gem..

As you probably know, I'm at the University of Southern California School of Medicine. I've been out of the smallpox game for roughly 40 years. I'll help you with the numbers on this one as you seem to be struggling, the source of authority you are quoting has no experience of Smallpox vaccination after 1962.

his speech is dated 2002 (and is on a specifically anti vaccine site-http://www.vaclib.org/)

What relevance does this have to the Smallpox eradication programme of the
WHO between 1967-1978?

Do you still believe that the eradication of Smallpox was due to improvements in sanitation and not vaccination? If you don't like the tone of discussion cry me a fucking river, you talk total fucking shit, expect the abuse.
 
I suppose this was due to improvements in sanitation as well.....

http://www.polioeradication.org/history.asp

In 1988, the World Health Assembly (WHA) the annual meeting of the ministers of health of all Member States of the World Health Organization, voted to launch a global goal to eradicate polio. As a result of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative - the largest public health effort to date - at the end of 2003, indigenous polio had been eliminated from all but 6 countries of the world. In 2003, fewer than 800 children were paralysed by polio.
 
As for it being on an 'anti-vaccine' site... so what? Are you suggesting it's fabricated?

You could have found the minutes of the meeting here on the CDC site itself, June 2002, page 8 I believe.

As for having a go at his credentials - well he was speaking to the CDC as a world authority on smallpox. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
zed66 said:
You have been given prima facie evidence of possibly the single greatest medical advance in the history of mankind and still you are not willing to accept that not only can vaccination work, but it has worked.
prima facie = first appearances. You did know that, didn't you? :rolleyes:

Given the estimate of 300m deaths from Smallpox Variola in the 20th century thats 120, 000, 000 lives saved since 1978. Yet you claim this is due to improvements in sanitation, do you think sanitation in the third world miraculously improved between 1967-1978 to the extent that Smallpox was totally eradicated, for the first time in over 3000 years?
You logic is faulty. I said that sanitation never fails to beat smallpox. This is true. I didn't say it was the only way smallpox disappears.

It isn't possible to have a two way discussion with you, as you have what I can only describe as a religious belief in your own unsubstantiated views.
I have been patiently addressing your questions. You are just taking potshots. It seems your idea of 'conversation' is having someone agree with you - sorry.

I have given you concrete evidence of the ability of vaccination to save lives by the hundreds of millions.Smallpox is only one example amongst many.
No you have not. You are just parroting stuff you find on WHO websites.
 
Jazzz said:
As for it being on an 'anti-vaccine' site... so what? Are you suggesting it's fabricated?

You could have found the minutes of the meeting here on the CDC site itself, June 2002, page 8 I believe.

As for having a go at his credentials - well he was speaking to the CDC as a world authority on smallpox. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Page 8 of the PDF file for June 2002 shows a list of contributors none of which includes Dr. Mack.

Once again do you consider changes in sanitation to be responsible for the eradication of Smallpox?
 
Jazzz said:
prima facie = first appearances. You did know that, didn't you?
Literal translation = first appearance
Legal meaningf= open and closed

Since your Latin is so good, care to tell me the Latin for cow?
 
Jazzz said:
No you have not. You are just parroting stuff you find on WHO websites.
Since I am using the eradication of Smallpox by the WHO as an exampe of the effectiveness of vaccination it's kind of hard not to.

Would you like more from the FDA or the CDC as you seem happy to accept these as sources of authority?
 
Legal definition of the term prima facie

Evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or to establish the fact in question unless rebutted.

You did know that didn't you?
(I don't feel the need to resort to rolleye smileys when dealing with the cerebrally challenged, so will spare you the sentiment).
 
"Even in the absence of a smallpox transmission program, Dr. Mack suspected that the disease would die out anyway".


There it is on Page 8. I can't see how you missed it. :rolleyes:
 
And back on track...

Do you still maintain that the eradication of Smallpox from planet Earth was caused solely by an increase in standards of sanitation?

And can you please respond to this one while you're there....

I suppose this was due to improvements in sanitation as well.....

http://www.polioeradication.org/history.asp

In 1988, the World Health Assembly (WHA) the annual meeting of the ministers of health of all Member States of the World Health Organization, voted to launch a global goal to eradicate polio. As a result of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative - the largest public health effort to date - at the end of 2003, indigenous polio had been eliminated from all but 6 countries of the world. In 2003, fewer than 800 children were paralysed by polio.
 
Jazzz said:
"Even in the absence of a smallpox transmission program, Dr. Mack suspected that the disease would die out anyway".


There it is on Page 8. I can't see how you missed it. :rolleyes:
I don't dispute this, it was in the original link. I dispute the authoriity of a man who by his own admission has not been involved with Smallpox since 1962.

Now stop looking for diversions and answer the questions on post 89
 
Back
Top Bottom