Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Kids harder to teach than 30 years ago? Is this why?

Jorum said:
I have copies of the technical specifications for almost all WHO International Standard vaccines (various influenzas, polio, yellow fever you name it)
So I'll have a look tomorrrow and let you know exactly what is in them.
There are package inserts listed here. But do check!
 
Jazzz said:
It's vaccines

It's more Jazzz bollocks, you mean!

You really shouldn't keep harping on about vaccines, especially as you have been caught out every time you attempt to convince people that vaccines are worse than the diseases they are designed to prevent.

Give it up. Save it for David Icke fans who are gullible enough to believe this shite.
 
Jorum said:
I have copies of the technical specifications for almost all WHO International Standard vaccines (various influenzas, polio, yellow fever you name it)
So I'll have a look tomorrrow and let you know exactly what is in them.

Please! Don't feed this guy ideas, Jorum - if there were a vaccine for paranoid hypochondriacs Jazzz would be a prime candidate for testing it...

This has been done to death before and nothing was proved other than spreading fear in young parents about the MMR vaccine makes people very angry at Jazzz and his "original" ideas.

If you have some info, by all means let us know - but treat everything Jazzz says about vaccines with the highest scepticism possible!!!
 
pk said:
Please! Don't feed this guy ideas, Jorum.
If you have some info, by all means let us know - but treat everything Jazzz says about vaccines with the highest scepticism possible!!!
It is probably not possible to be more sceptical about Jazzz's ideas than I am, don't worry :)
By the way the MMR vaccine has never contained ethylmercury at all.
 
Jorum said:
It is probably not possible to be more sceptical about Jazzz's ideas than I am, don't worry :)
By the way the MMR vaccine has never contained ethylmercury at all.

Interesting info re the MMR vaccine.
 
Without going into boring detail that none of us understand (me included) most of the vaccines contain various sugars as additives.
The use of ethylmercury (which makes up 49% of an additive called Thimerosal)
is and has been largely phased out. (none of the US child vaccines use it)
The influenza vaccines still contain Thimerosal due to technical reasons.
The amount of material in the vaccines is tiny. If you were being vaccinated every day I might start worrying. The couple of dozen injections received in your whole live isn't going to represent any meaningful risk.

The problem is risk-assesment of people is fucked.
Driving to work is the most dangerous thing any of us is ever likely to but do we worry?
 
Jorum said:
Without going into boring detail that none of us understand (me included) most of the vaccines contain various sugars as additives.
The use of ethylmercury (which makes up 49% of an additive called Thimerosal)
is and has been largely phased out. (none of the US child vaccines use it)
The influenza vaccines still contain Thimerosal due to technical reasons.
The amount of material in the vaccines is tiny. If you were being vaccinated every day I might start worrying. The couple of dozen injections received in your whole live isn't going to represent any meaningful risk.

The problem is risk-assesment of people is fucked.
Driving to work is the most dangerous thing any of us is ever likely to but do we worry?

Mercury killed more Victorian photographers than the Thomersoal in vaccines ever will.
 
Donna Ferentes said:
Incidentally, does this strike anybody else as an exercise in "it were better in my day"? It's even got the tradtional "thirty years ago" attached which is the usual time against which the present is unfavourably judged.

See Geoffrey Richmond's seminal Hooligans for any number of examples of this syndrome, dating back to Roman times.

I have been a teacher for the last 23 years, and I have also read the book you refer to, which is actually by Geoffrey Pearson (I even wrote him a letter about it).

It has definitely got harder to teach kids in the time I've been working. Partly this is due to the social reasons mentioned above; partly IMO it is due to the gutless policies of successive goverments.

Schools are now driven by the sort of bullshit management attitudes and jargon that are mocked by viewers of "The Apprentice". When I started teaching the Head Teacher was precisely that: a teacher in charge of a school. Now the Heads of schools are remote administrative figures more concerned with woolly bullshit. Now making sure a "policy" is "in place" (i.e. logged on some computer somewhere) is more important than having a "policy" which is genuinely in operation.

Got to go now - but MUCH more later...
 
Schools are now driven by the sort of bullshit management attitudes and jargon that are mocked by viewers of "The Apprentice".

Spot on, management bullshit has been a major contributor to severely fucked up education, health and local govt in recent years, particularly things like TQM and SMART targets. :mad:

The diet thing is a moot point, I was raised on fishfingers, chips and hotdogs whereas in general diet is much more mediterranean now and everyone knows about 5 a day.

Likewise childcare, I was a latchkey kid, took myself to school on the bus/train from an early age, etc. Plenty of it about then, plenty now, not necessarily a problem.

I do think the TV/PS2 in the bedroom and lack of sleep are probably fair points though, merely going by personal experience. Ties in with something not mentioned which is the amount of time spent reading for pleasure.
 
ICB said:
The diet thing is a moot point, I was raised on fishfingers, chips and hotdogs whereas in general diet is much more mediterranean now and everyone knows about 5 a day.
Nigella and Nigel Slater haven't had much influence on sprawling council estates. It's hard to cook healthily on benefits, especially if, thanks to Domestic Science being replaced by Food Technology, neither you, yer mum or yer nan know how to cook properly with fresh ingredients.
 
Mrs Magpie said:
Nigella and Nigel Slater haven't had much influence on sprawling council estates. It's hard to cook healthily on benefits, especially if, thanks to Domestic Science being replaced by Food Technology, neither you, yer mum or yer nan know how to cook properly with fresh ingredients.

all true and fair enough, I was talking from personal experience, as someone from a low-income single-parent middle-class background

doubt much olive oil was sold in the UK in 1970 and every day there's a new story about the health benefits of some food stuff or another, this morning it was chilli and prostate cancer, hoorah!
 
The TVs etc in bedroom thing is definitely trouble - as you say ICB, it doesn't help sleep patterns one bit. And when you think of all the implications of, say, a family of three kids, each with their whole world essentially in their bedroom, the effects of it on health, social skills and learning are not going to be positive ones.
 
Jorum said:
Without going into boring detail that none of us understand (me included) most of the vaccines contain various sugars as additives.
The use of ethylmercury (which makes up 49% of an additive called Thimerosal)
is and has been largely phased out. (none of the US child vaccines use it)
The influenza vaccines still contain Thimerosal due to technical reasons.
The amount of material in the vaccines is tiny. If you were being vaccinated every day I might start worrying. The couple of dozen injections received in your whole live isn't going to represent any meaningful risk.

The problem is risk-assesment of people is fucked.
Driving to work is the most dangerous thing any of us is ever likely to but do we worry?
Where on earth have you got your information from?

American children have been exposed to plenty of thimerosal. You can read about it on the FDA's own website!

here's the figure for you

Through its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the FDA studied the results and found regularly vaccinated young children were injected with up to 187.5 µg of ethylmercury by the time they were six months old. When trying to assess whether this dosage was likely to cause damage, the CBER could not find guidelines for ethylmercury.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thimerosal_controversy

This may not seem much, but mercury is the second most toxic naturally occuring element, after plutonium, and babies are extremely delicate things with ill-developed endocrine systems.

A CDC report - details of which were kept secret - found that 62.5 micrograms were enough to cause elevated risk of autism

The confidential version of the study, however, clearly demonstrated that an exposure to more than 62.5 micrograms of mercury within the first three months of life significantly increased a child's risk of developing autism. Specifically, the study found a 2.48 times increased risk of autism - that is to say, children with the exposure were more than twice as likely to develop autism as children not exposed.
http://www.vaccineinfo.net/issues/mercury/autismHg.shtml

This is just mercury of course. It's disingenous to describe the other ingredients as 'sugars'... lovely things like formaldehyde (like mercury, there is no safe level of formaldehyde.. you just don't want it. Antifreeze. Aluminium. Borax. etc.

Here's another good page on vaccine ingredients. Did you know that latex in is in the Hepatitis B vaccine? No wonder nurses have been getting latex allergies.

We just have no idea what the cumulative combined effects of all these toxins are.
 
From the same FDA website you are selectively quoting from

http://www.fda.gov/Cber/vaccine/thimerosal.htm#tox

In 2004, the IOM's Immunization Safety Review Committee issued its final report, examining the hypothesis that vaccines, specifically the MMR vaccines and thimerosal containing vaccines, are causally associated with autism. In this report, the committee incorporated new epidemiological evidence from the U.S., Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, and studies of biologic mechanisms related to vaccines and autism since its report in 2001. The committee concluded that this body of evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism, and that hypotheses generated to date concerning a biological mechanism for such causality are theoretical only. Further, the committee stated that the benefits of vaccination are proven and the hypothesis of susceptible populations is presently speculative, and that widespread rejection of vaccines would lead to increases in incidences of serious infectious diseases like measles, whooping cough and Hib bacterial meningitis.

According to the table at the bottom of this page MMR Vaccine in US never contained Thimerosal.

At the bottom of the same page are links to the U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency website warning of the dangers of mercury posioning from fish (both natural and pollution related).

http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fishadvice/advice.html

Specifically

Do not eat Shark, Swordfish, King Mackerel, or Tilefish because they contain high levels of mercury.

But I haven't noticed you mentioning these as a source of mercury poisoning. Could it be because you don't have faintest idea what you are talking about and will desperately accept the faintest snippet of information that confirms your paranoid delusions? Surely not.
 
isvicthere? said:
Now making sure a "policy" is "in place" (i.e. logged on some computer somewhere) is more important than having a "policy" which is genuinely in operation.
This sounds familiar. A major reason I left my last job was this bullshit way of always saying everybody was "committed" to something or other but never actually doing it. The effect of the second part wa to demoralise anybody who actually wanted to get things done: the effect of the first was that when they complained, they could be painted as the ones who weren't committed because they weren't fully behind the policy.
 
Jorum said:
The use of ethylmercury (which makes up 49% of an additive called Thimerosal)
is and has been largely phased out. (none of the US child vaccines use it)
The influenza vaccines still contain Thimerosal due to technical reasons.
Jazzz said:
Where on earth have you got your information from?

American children have been exposed to plenty of thimerosal. You can read about it on the FDA's own website!
You seem to selectively choose from your holy internet only isolated paragraphs that supports your arguments.

The USA CDC website also has info about Thimerosal
http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vacsafe/concerns/thimerosal/default.htm
Of particular relevance is
Today, with the exception of some Influenza (flu) vaccines, none of the vaccines used in the U.S. to protect preschool children against 12 infectious diseases contain thimerosal as a preservative.

Even more important than looking up various things on the internet is actually having a decent knowledge of science and risk assessment. Also understanding that the tiny possible health implications of vaccination are far overwhelmed by the benefits of preventing high infant mortality, pandemics and the mental and physical damage that something like rubella can cause.

Because people are no longer exposed to things like rubella, whooping cough etc. they forget what horrible things they are and the deaths they cause.
 
Jorum said:
Because people are no longer exposed to things like rubella, whooping cough etc. they forget what horrible things they are and the deaths they cause.

One of my family decided after a bout of media scaremongering to not give their son the whooping cough vaccine and he caught the disease and nearly died.
 
Jorum said:
You seem to selectively choose from your holy internet only isolated paragraphs that supports your arguments.

The USA CDC website also has info about Thimerosal
http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vacsafe/concerns/thimerosal/default.htm
Of particular relevance is
Today, with the exception of some Influenza (flu) vaccines, none of the vaccines used in the U.S. to protect preschool children against 12 infectious diseases contain thimerosal as a preservative.

I linked to the FDA website, because it corrected you, and you couldn't doubt it.

Regardless of the successful campaign and hushed-up studies which led to the removal of thimerosal from many vaccines, in the context of this thread it's highly relevant as most of the children that are the subject of this thread will have had several significant shots of it.

Even more important than looking up various things on the internet is actually having a decent knowledge of science and risk assessment.
I do. Studies of vaccinated groups with unvaccinated controls are rarely performed. This is unscientific. As such, the effects of the injections must be considered an unknown risk.

Also understanding that the tiny possible health implications of vaccination are far overwhelmed by the benefits of preventing high infant mortality, pandemics and the mental and physical damage that something like rubella can cause.
A wider debate; but this thread is about developmental issues in school children.
Because people are no longer exposed to things like rubella, whooping cough etc. they forget what horrible things they are and the deaths they cause.
I caught whooping cough a few years ago. Horrible; and I had been vaccinated as a child. FYI, Rubella isn't a killer. Also FYI, I have researched books as well as the internet on vaccines.
 
Yes rubella carries risks if contracted by a mother in her first trimester of pregnancy. Thank you.

Jorum had described it as 'causing deaths'. I was simply correcting him and endeavouring to keep facts accurate.

I don't consider that 'idiotic'.
 
Jazzz said:
I caught whooping cough a few years ago. Horrible;

You may have found it slightly more horrible if you were an infant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whooping_cough

Pertussis, also known as "whooping cough", is a highly contagious disease that is one of the leading causes of vaccine-preventable deaths. There are 30–50 million cases per year, and about 300,000 deaths per year. Most deaths occur in children under one year of age. Ninety percent of all cases occur in developing countries. It is caused by certain species of the bacterium Bordetella—usually B. pertussis, but some cases are caused by B. parapertussis.
 
Indeed. But that it simplistic. It would be little use 'protecting' from a disease, if the consequences were an increased risk of dying from other causes. Most of the time vaccines do not even produce reduced death rates from the disease in question, although they may reduce incidence.

Sweded banned whooping cough vaccination in 1979. It is held by anti-vaccinists as the most dangerous vaccine. While Swedes live with whooping cough, it may also surprise you that they have the lowest infant mortality rate.
 
Jazzz said:
Indeed. But that it simplistic. It would be little use 'protecting' from a disease, if the consequences were an increased risk of dying from other causes. Most of the time vaccines do not even produce reduced death rates from the disease in question, although they may reduce incidence.

Sweded banned whooping cough vaccination in 1979. It is held by anti-vaccinists as the most dangerous vaccine. While Swedes live with whooping cough, it may also surprise you that they have the lowest infant mortality rate.
It wouldn't surprise me at all. To reiterate.
Ninety percent of all cases occur in developing countries
 
zed66 said:
It wouldn't surprise me at all. To reiterate.
Ninety percent of all cases occur in developing countries
Yes, I would maintain the real cause of the ravages of disease are malnourishment and poor sanitation. Not lack of vaccination, as the Swedes show.
 
zed66 said:
Just to see how much of an idiot you actually are: what do you think of Tetanus jabs?
I don't this repeated personal insult is at all justified zed66. But we are so programmed to worship vaccination that this is what you receive should you dare question any aspect of the practise. Thank you for showing that.
 
Back
Top Bottom