Ken Livingstone is a fucken wanker
- Thread starter Bear
- Start date
Blagsta said:Is he fuck a sound engineer. He's a cheesy wedding DJ.
I do both - part for the cash and part as I enjoy it.
I also install the stuff.
Keeps me off the streets at night.
Blagsta said:of course you do
Odd that you know so much about my business. I know nothing about what you do as this forum is anonymous.
Even without this I can see you are a gobshite who is quite happy to express an idea with no way to check what you are saying is true.
wanker
Blagsta said:ooooh, touched a raw nerve did I?
good
Ok you sexy beast. You are so strong and horny I just want to let you fuck my arse. It's only a pity I can't have your children.
Blagsta said:
Thanks darling
Kenny Vermouth
Wankers
That's fucking funny.Pigeon said:
big footed fred said:
I don't recall any racist chestnuts (
)Certainly wasn't suggesting you're a racist, given that some of your best friends are kebab shop owners.
I was simply registering my delighted surprise with the originality of your startling insight about the nature of cheeky chirpy scousers.
Boring twat.
Descartes said:
Getting back to China, Don't forget the Opium Wars! Strange isn't it, how our history lessons at school didn't really concentrate on this one?
In the 19th Century the trade imbalance between China and the British Empire was so great (we all liked Chinese tea but British goods weren't all that popular in China) that we decided to dump large amounts of Opium on China in order to balance it up. Given that this was fuelling addiction the Chinese weren't too keen on this so we threatened them with Gun boats to keep the trade going.
There is a case to say that Britain was the biggest drug dealer in history - making the present day Columbian cartels look like occasional dealers.
Pigeon said:
Sounds like a silly attempt to make out that I think "them niggers got rhythm".
Come on and get real.
I only know two indian take away owners (ok they are pakistannis but who cares). Can't say I have had more than the odd passing conversation with any kebab shop owners but I do know lots of chinese resaurant and take away owners.
Just so you don't get the wrong idea and think I spend all my life in liverpool's kebab shops.
Don't want you to think I'm a fat Boring twat.
Cunt
Wolveryeti
Detty Pig
Ken's a cunt, but he pisses off people who are much bigger cunts than him, thereby making him not a cunt.
Pigeon said:
It was the kebab shop thing.
big footed fred said:
all I can say is,
guinnessdrinker said:all I can say is,
just playing with pig eon.
I can't believe he tried that stupid racist bit with the "do I thinks blacks have rhythm" line
big footed fred said:
Helpful hint #1:I think you'll find there's a pretty dim view taken of people fucking with other folks' user names. So you might want to get a grip if you want to stay & play.
Helpful hint #2: If you don't want people to assume that you've lazily assimilated every tiresome stereotype you've ever stumbled across, you'd possibly be well advised not to spout tired old bullshit which suggests you view entire cities as homogeneous communities populated solely by the bastard offspring of Stan Boardman. La.
Helpful hint #1: Granted and I will pop in a sorry for that one.
Helpful hint #2: Still think you are being too serious.
I'd bet most in liverpool would just come up with a jibe about yorkshire and sit down for a pint together.
Chill baby
Helpful hint #2: Still think you are being too serious.
I'd bet most in liverpool would just come up with a jibe about yorkshire and sit down for a pint together.
Chill baby
nightbreed
Im Bored
'Red Ken' wrote this on the LP Campaign group site.
Is it really worth analysing? Or do we just ignore him and listen to John Rees??
Vote Labour on 4 May
By Ken Livingstone
Attention is now focussed on the approaching local government elections at which seats are being contested right across the country and in London where the 32 borough councils including the three local borough mayors are all up for election. The right wing media are hoping Labour will suffer a significant setback and have been boosting David Cameron’s attempts to camouflage the real nature of his party. The Liberal Democrats, while moving sharply to the right, have been attempting to position themselves as the main beneficiary of voters disaffected with Labour.
The threat from the Tories is evident but despite the tremendous media hype, and innumerable gimmicks, Cameron has not yet succeeded in driving up Tory support. I therefore want to look at the threat from the Liberal Democrats. Labour supporters considering voting Liberal Democrat need to be urgently warned that it would not lead to improved local services — whether the result is the election of Liberal Democrat councillors or, as is the case in many areas, it assists the election of the Tories.
Labour should concentrate its campaign on promoting its achievements in local government, which run parallel with the increased spending on health and education nationally. Despite attempting to adopt left wing rhetoric, the Liberal Democrats do not represent a progressive alternative to Labour in the slightest. Their policies mean less investment in public services. Under its new leadership, policy is moving further to the right. Menzies Campbell backed their recent decision to support partial privatisation of Royal Mail and he has promoted into leadership positions many from the party’s Thatcherite wing that produced the 2004 Orange Book. Vince Cable is now Deputy Leader accompanied by others in key portfolios, such as David Laws the spokesman for work and pensions who proposes cutting lone parent benefits. They are hostile to trade unions, support banning strikes in ‘vital’ public services and opposed the creation of the national minimum wage.
The Liberal Democrats record in regional and local government reflects this. Services are undermined where they have overall control and in the councils where they can successfully unite with the Conservatives against Labour’s proposals. The recent increased investment in local public services, such as education, has only been made possible by Labour being in government. In London we have been able to invest in transport, childcare, safer neighbourhoods and environmental improvements. Faced with this proposed public investment the Liberal Democrat rhetoric has proved to be entirely fake. They formed a coalition to install a right-wing Tory as chair of the London Assembly and formed a bloc with the Conservatives in the Assembly to oppose the budgets necessary to underpin such services improvements.
Contrary to the ‘green’ rhetoric deployed in their current local election campaign, the Liberal Democrats have opposed policies to improve London’s environment including measures to clean up black cab engines through a 20 pence per journey flat rate ‘green levy’ and the West London Tram. They even fought the last London mayoral election proposing to make cuts to bus and tube services. They resist my efforts to secure more affordable housing.
In London’s local borough councils, a similar picture exists. In Southwark council, the Liberal Democrats have allied with the Conservatives against Labour in order to reduce social services spending and push through a series of cuts including to nursery provision. Their attitude to local community concerns is reflected in their granting a license to a strip club despite the opposition of local residents and people working in the area.
In Lambeth, although Labour has the largest group of councillors, the Liberal Democrats formed a coalition with the Conservatives whose record on service delivery has been criticised in numerous areas from housing benefits to children’s social services. In Islington, since the Liberal Democrats took control services have been undermined, including those for the elderly, and they have taken an axe to the voluntary sector. Lambeth and Islington are among the poorest performing councils in terms of registering voters. The Department for Constitutional Affairs indicated in December that Islington had registered only 67 per cent of eligible voters. It is widely recognised that such disenfranchisement disproportionately affects Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities.
Other Liberal Democrat councils have also been associated with such implicit racism, most notoriously Tower Hamlets in the 1980s with its housing policies. More recently Southwark council has been condemned by the race relations expert Herman Ouseley, after his investigation into the council’s race relations policies suggested that regeneration of areas had effectively been used to drive out black business. This record of the Liberal Democrats in London is repeated throughout the country.
Finally, with the BNP standing a record number of candidates in this set of elections hoping to capitalise on racism, including increased hostility being whipped up against Muslims, it is important that turnout is maximised to ensure that these fascists do not increase their existing toe-hold in local government.
Only a solid vote for Labour can fight the implementation of Tory-type policies and be the best answer to the BNP.
-------------------------
Is it really worth analysing? Or do we just ignore him and listen to John Rees??
Vote Labour on 4 May
By Ken Livingstone
Attention is now focussed on the approaching local government elections at which seats are being contested right across the country and in London where the 32 borough councils including the three local borough mayors are all up for election. The right wing media are hoping Labour will suffer a significant setback and have been boosting David Cameron’s attempts to camouflage the real nature of his party. The Liberal Democrats, while moving sharply to the right, have been attempting to position themselves as the main beneficiary of voters disaffected with Labour.
The threat from the Tories is evident but despite the tremendous media hype, and innumerable gimmicks, Cameron has not yet succeeded in driving up Tory support. I therefore want to look at the threat from the Liberal Democrats. Labour supporters considering voting Liberal Democrat need to be urgently warned that it would not lead to improved local services — whether the result is the election of Liberal Democrat councillors or, as is the case in many areas, it assists the election of the Tories.
Labour should concentrate its campaign on promoting its achievements in local government, which run parallel with the increased spending on health and education nationally. Despite attempting to adopt left wing rhetoric, the Liberal Democrats do not represent a progressive alternative to Labour in the slightest. Their policies mean less investment in public services. Under its new leadership, policy is moving further to the right. Menzies Campbell backed their recent decision to support partial privatisation of Royal Mail and he has promoted into leadership positions many from the party’s Thatcherite wing that produced the 2004 Orange Book. Vince Cable is now Deputy Leader accompanied by others in key portfolios, such as David Laws the spokesman for work and pensions who proposes cutting lone parent benefits. They are hostile to trade unions, support banning strikes in ‘vital’ public services and opposed the creation of the national minimum wage.
The Liberal Democrats record in regional and local government reflects this. Services are undermined where they have overall control and in the councils where they can successfully unite with the Conservatives against Labour’s proposals. The recent increased investment in local public services, such as education, has only been made possible by Labour being in government. In London we have been able to invest in transport, childcare, safer neighbourhoods and environmental improvements. Faced with this proposed public investment the Liberal Democrat rhetoric has proved to be entirely fake. They formed a coalition to install a right-wing Tory as chair of the London Assembly and formed a bloc with the Conservatives in the Assembly to oppose the budgets necessary to underpin such services improvements.
Contrary to the ‘green’ rhetoric deployed in their current local election campaign, the Liberal Democrats have opposed policies to improve London’s environment including measures to clean up black cab engines through a 20 pence per journey flat rate ‘green levy’ and the West London Tram. They even fought the last London mayoral election proposing to make cuts to bus and tube services. They resist my efforts to secure more affordable housing.
In London’s local borough councils, a similar picture exists. In Southwark council, the Liberal Democrats have allied with the Conservatives against Labour in order to reduce social services spending and push through a series of cuts including to nursery provision. Their attitude to local community concerns is reflected in their granting a license to a strip club despite the opposition of local residents and people working in the area.
In Lambeth, although Labour has the largest group of councillors, the Liberal Democrats formed a coalition with the Conservatives whose record on service delivery has been criticised in numerous areas from housing benefits to children’s social services. In Islington, since the Liberal Democrats took control services have been undermined, including those for the elderly, and they have taken an axe to the voluntary sector. Lambeth and Islington are among the poorest performing councils in terms of registering voters. The Department for Constitutional Affairs indicated in December that Islington had registered only 67 per cent of eligible voters. It is widely recognised that such disenfranchisement disproportionately affects Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities.
Other Liberal Democrat councils have also been associated with such implicit racism, most notoriously Tower Hamlets in the 1980s with its housing policies. More recently Southwark council has been condemned by the race relations expert Herman Ouseley, after his investigation into the council’s race relations policies suggested that regeneration of areas had effectively been used to drive out black business. This record of the Liberal Democrats in London is repeated throughout the country.
Finally, with the BNP standing a record number of candidates in this set of elections hoping to capitalise on racism, including increased hostility being whipped up against Muslims, it is important that turnout is maximised to ensure that these fascists do not increase their existing toe-hold in local government.
Only a solid vote for Labour can fight the implementation of Tory-type policies and be the best answer to the BNP.
-------------------------
Nigel Irritable
Five, Ten, Fifteen Years
nightbreed said:
Are those our only options? Why can't we ignore both of them?
Thew most worrying thing, all the rhetoric about the other parties, what are Labour going to do?
If labour are not doing it, Health, transport, taxs etc, throw the lot out and if the others don't do it , throw them out at the next election but to leave the present lot in power gives the impression that they can get away with anything... as they are already doing..
If labour are not doing it, Health, transport, taxs etc, throw the lot out and if the others don't do it , throw them out at the next election but to leave the present lot in power gives the impression that they can get away with anything... as they are already doing..
Ken,
warts and all
SOLIDARITY, from those who needed it - will never been forgotten
_ one of the best reasons for living in London - is having a mayor and GLA
that loves London - chill u fcukwittless -
enjoy a summer in London - and then maybe - celebrate the revolution starting in ? not the Albert twatX...... Peace and Justice.... and u billy stunc
respect and support the coalition...
warts and all
SOLIDARITY, from those who needed it - will never been forgotten
_ one of the best reasons for living in London - is having a mayor and GLA
that loves London - chill u fcukwittless -
enjoy a summer in London - and then maybe - celebrate the revolution starting in ? not the Albert twatX...... Peace and Justice.... and u billy stunc
respect and support the coalition...
nightbreed
Im Bored
1867 said:
Were you pissed when you said that?
nightbreed
Im Bored
Nigel Irritable said:
Who do you suggest Nige!!
Campaign group , wishy washy reformists.
Ditto John Rees respectozoids.
I am at a loss to find someone else relevant and electable.
Similar threads
- Poll
