editor said:Any chance of the personal-abuse-o-meter being taken down a notch or two please?
Pickman's model said:i was under the impression - reinforced, i admit, by reports in the press - that he was hacked to death rather than battered to death. unless, of course, you know better.
knopf said:.... unless, of course, Blakelock had been a member of the public -- in which case, he'd have fallen down the stairs while carrying a drawer full of cutlery.
fanta said:LOL You desperate wanker!![]()
'Battered to death' or 'Hacked to death' - what is the crucial difference with regard to what angry mob is talking about and the point s/he is making?
The answer is NOTHING!![]()

angry bob said:Your implication being that if a member of the public was 'hacked' to death by a mob of policemen then it would be written up and accepted that the death was accidental. Really?
angry bob said:Your implication being that if a member of the public was 'hacked' to death by a mob of policemen then it would be written up and accepted that the death was accidental. Really?
Wow. Source please.MC5 said:Like the Manchester student who was writing a thesis on the police and came across evidence that the police in that city were out of control and acting as provocateurs.
He house was burgled and material he had written went missing. He was attacked in the street one night by a group of men, one of whom stabbed a cigarette in his face. He subsequently left the country as he was fearful for his life.
It's a funny old world.
Err, I'm hardly likely to go out and buy a bloody book.butchersapron said:With Extreme Prejudice: Investigation into Police Vigilantism in Manchester by Martin Walker
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0950996785/qid=1128624289/202-2348133-5291845
editor said:Err, I'm hardly likely to go out and buy a bloody book.
I haven't got that privilege, I'm afraid.rednblack said:if you've got enhanced leisure time you could try googling, you'll find some quotes, some reviews, some positive, some critical
editor said:I haven't got that privilege, I'm afraid.
I work for a living.

brixtonvilla said:Got a link for that, MC5?
<edit, I see Butchers has covered it>
editor said:I haven't got that privilege, I'm afraid.
I work for a living.
Zonk said:Waying one copper up on the back of countless who die in police custody....I couldn't give a monkey's.
tobyjug said:Countless, that is total rubbish.
MC5 said:Like the Manchester student who was writing a thesis on the police and came across evidence that the police in that city were out of control and acting as provocateurs.
He house was burgled and material he had written went missing. He was attacked in the street one night by a group of men, one of whom stabbed a cigarette in his face. He subsequently left the country as he was fearful for his life.
It's a funny old world.
ViolentPanda said:The implements used to kill him can make a difference to the charges that cabn be raised against the perpetrators. As far as I know striking someone with a boot or fist is "assault" whereas using a knife adds the suffix "with a deadly weapon".
)Rebel Warrior.fanta said:(PS you seem as obssessed about the IRA as the obscure fool whose name I can't recall is about George Galloway. Maybe you're related?)
FruitandNut said:A big problem with the concept of 'justice' is that it gets tossed around like a washed salad by irrational, biased and paranoid minds. Just what chance has it really got?
(The fact that the Guildford Four and Birmingham Six were eventually 'found not guilty' and released, does not necessarily mean they were all really innocent - it means that there was not enough bona fide evidence available to the courts.)
likesfish said:guilford 4 and birmingham 6 were completely innocent the bombers who actually planted the bombs were in jail as well for other crimes![]()
there only crime was being irish and not standing up to interrogation![]()
so lets shut that one down right now![]()