Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Just been made 'redundant'-advice on unfair dismissal please.

Red Jezza said:
irrelevant. you got the fuckers by the cojones. time to squeeze.
also get on to your MP and local councillor
I am informed that, if you are getting nowhere, a slightly dishonest but excellent tactic is to write to them (obviously after your initail letter so it looks slightly less suss) referring to letters you previously sent them - which don't exist...! This of course confuses them and means they have to contact you to figure out what was in the nonexistent letters ... :)
 
Velouria - I'm sorry I'm not 100% sure I know what you mean here. Sorry to be a pain, could you explain again for me please. Thanks.:)
 
Iconboy said:
Velouria - I'm sorry I'm not 100% sure I know what you mean here. Sorry to be a pain, could you explain again for me please. Thanks.:)

It seems to me that you have a strong enough case that you don't need to follow that path.

To summarise, you may be entitled to compensation for any or all of:

  • Alleged "redundancy" without counsultation;
  • Victimisation as the person who complained of gender discrimination;
  • Victimisation for having made a personal injury claim;
  • The personal injury claim itself - you were asked to lift something over 25kg, yes? That could be a criminal prosecution...

That should leave you with a respectable sum - though, as noted, don't expect to be spending it for a couple of years if they fight all the way.

If they're rational, though, they'll realise that fighting it will cost them many tens of thousands of pounds and they'll "settle" - in other words pay you a significant part of that to agree not to take it to Tribunal at all.

Or they may give the impression of planning to fight it to see whether you bottle out, and then offer you a largish sum of money on the steps of the Tribunal hearing. As a rule of thumb, I'd tell my solicitor to shoot back "twice that?" and expect them to agree instantly.



And a note to everyone else: this is why you join a union now, before this happens to you!
 
Iconboy said:
Velouria - I'm sorry I'm not 100% sure I know what you mean here. Sorry to be a pain, could you explain again for me please. Thanks.:)
You write a letter.
You don't write a second letter, or if you do, don't send it.
You then write a third, rather irate, letter which refers to points raised in your second letter (which of course you never sent).
Continue with this tactic until they get disturbed and have to actually talk to you to discuss what's in these 'missing' letters. They will of course assume that they lost or binned them :D

PS DON'T write in green ink whatever you do!
 
The above could prove expensive if it went wrong.

Iconboy's messages give me the impression that other people - those who argue with lawyers in their own language, for fun - would be more likely to profit from this kind of brinkpersonship than he.
 
Back
Top Bottom