revol68 said:I don't think the attitude that people guilty of such sadistic acts as John Bowden carried out are scum is reserved for the 'state' or the 'right wing'.
You don't think people change?
revol68 said:I don't think the attitude that people guilty of such sadistic acts as John Bowden carried out are scum is reserved for the 'state' or the 'right wing'.
phildwyer said:You don't think people change?
revol68 said:Yes, do I think they should always be given such a chance, a chance they so brutally denied to their victims, no I don't.
Frampton said:The notion that people are incapable of change is a frightening one.
likesfish said:Bowden appears to be poor me the screws have got it in for me its so unfair.
newbie said:is that really the case, or is it simply that when the social worker report led to him being transferred from open to cat A prison he and his supporters made rather a lot of fuss.
Had anyone reading this thread ever heard of the guy prior to the social worker report? Had a different sw written a different report, with no mention of ABC or terrorism, he might be out on licence by now, living quietly down the street without his name and history plastered all over the internet, like plenty of others who've committed horrible crimes including his two co-accused.
The 'poor me' routine appears to be about the sw report. He's done his time for the crime... time in prison not in a psych hospital, which is where he's be if he hadn't recognised what he'd done and why he shouldn't have done it.
newbie said:you seem to be suggesting that politicisation has had a detrimental effect on him, that his way through life should have been to knuckle down, internalise all responsibility and accept what the system dealt him.
Is that a lesson for the rest of us or only for those who have some dreadful crime to atone?
likesfish said:not exactly sure what part the "system" had in making him murder someone
revol68 said:it brutalised him!!!111!!1
untethered said:Wasn't he brought up in care? Everyone knows that people like that go on to dismember helpless victims while they're still alive.

what's ignorant about not feeling particular sympathy for a man who ocsitrated and enacted a brutal and mindless murder for their own personal gain?Attica said:I was hoping the ignorant boo boys would give it a rest.
revol68 said:yeah but he also suffered anti irish racism apparently.![]()
untethered said:We are all responsible.
newbie said:is that really the case, or is it simply that when the social worker report led to him being transferred from open to cat A prison he and his supporters made rather a lot of fuss.
Had anyone reading this thread ever heard of the guy prior to the social worker report? Had a different sw written a different report, with no mention of ABC or terrorism, he might be out on licence by now, living quietly down the street without his name and history plastered all over the internet, like plenty of others who've committed horrible crimes including his two co-accused.
The 'poor me' routine appears to be about the sw report. He's done his time for the crime... time in prison not in a psych hospital, which is where he's be if he hadn't recognised what he'd done and why he shouldn't have done it.
untethered said:Wasn't he brought up in care? Everyone knows that people like that go on to dismember helpless victims while they're still alive.
likesfish said:not exactly sure what part the "system" had in making him murder someone
revol68 said:not me i'm irish and so I can't be held responsible for anything, if a head turns up in my fridge it's clearly ended up there as the inevitable outcome of 800 years of subjugation and a couple of Paddy Irish man jokes.
cantsin said:I bet you know a lot about being bought up in care , + what it does to "people like that " , so you carry on with your glib little keyboard routine , the hang em flog em brigade probably think your a top boy , well done all round .
newbie said:That's not the suggestion- he/his supporters are complaining about the way 'the system' is treating him now, towards the end of his sentence.
In 1982 the court sentenced him to 25 years for his crime, which he's done. As with any other prisoner, once he's served his sentence he's entitled to fair and reasonable treatment leading to (conditional) release. Isn't he?
Sfaics his supporters complaint is that he has been unreasonably treated very recently because he has become politicised.
There seems to be an attitude here that he should not have done so, that because his initial crime was so horrible he can have no political case to make, and that the way he has been treated very recently doesn't matter because of what he did 25 years ago.
tbh I find that slightly odd, and whilst, like revol, I think he's fortunate that the state didn't just kill him off as it would have done in texas, I do think he's as entitled as anyone else to reasonable treatment as he completes the sentence the court imposed.
untethered said:What I do know about people being brought up in care is that most don't go on to brutally murder and dismember defenceless people and then claim that it was part of the reason why they did it.
revol68 said:And he hasn't served his full time as he had a wee bit of an escape with a hostage.
unquestionablylikesfish said:abc put it about as a stupid drunken murder and got proved wrong when people went digging for the facts![]()
sort of undermines the whole case really
revol68 said:And he hasn't served his full time as he had a wee bit of an escape with a hostage.