Jeremey Kyle taking the piss?
- Thread starter badco
- Start date
chainsaw cat
Tea. Biccies. Happy now?
maomao
普費斯
That's now known as DV. Catch up.
Bakunin
I am Noodle's bitch.
Not to be itself confused with DVDA, involving four very big blokes and one (presumably highly uncomfortable) woman.
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
where's the eroticism in that pr0n eh? all you can see is sweaty ball sacks slapping against each other
strung out
💩 🤣 🍆 💦 🧐 👻 🐝 🐈⬛
what's DVLA then?
Plain old getting shafted.
double vaginal, double anal for those who aren't porn connosieurs
strung out
💩 🤣 🍆 💦 🧐 👻 🐝 🐈⬛
well duh
Bakunin
I am Noodle's bitch.
where's the eroticism in that pr0n eh? all you can see is sweaty ball sacks slapping against each other
It doesn't do it for me either, to be honest.
It's a government department that deals with driving licences and vehicle taxing IIRC. So not porny at all, unfortunately.
DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
This thread has gone down a dark path...
This thread was so much more tasteful when it was just about me and my brother shagging the same burd.
or each other, urgh
strung out
💩 🤣 🍆 💦 🧐 👻 🐝 🐈⬛
this thread's hot
teuchter
je suis teuchter
quimcunx
imprimeo, lamino, distribuo
No. Have you been watching perverted filth?
and sexy
kabbes
First intersubjective, then internalised
What we have here is a classic Bayesian problem of parameter and process uncertainty.
Firstly there is the process uncertainty. This is the randomness associated with life itself. If both men had had at this woman endlessly for an entire month, alternating every 30 minutes or so, then there would be a 50/50 chance as to which of them had impregnated her. In other words, even if we know all the starting conditions, there is still randomness in the result.
But then there is the parameter uncertainty. We don't actually know all the starting conditions. We know nothing of relative fertility, who did who to what and when, all these kind of things. So we can't accurately estimate the process uncertainty.
I'm pretty sure that this is the thought process that the chap on Jeremy Kyle went through before he -- probably entirely accurately -- gave his 90% estimate of fatherhood.
Firstly there is the process uncertainty. This is the randomness associated with life itself. If both men had had at this woman endlessly for an entire month, alternating every 30 minutes or so, then there would be a 50/50 chance as to which of them had impregnated her. In other words, even if we know all the starting conditions, there is still randomness in the result.
But then there is the parameter uncertainty. We don't actually know all the starting conditions. We know nothing of relative fertility, who did who to what and when, all these kind of things. So we can't accurately estimate the process uncertainty.
I'm pretty sure that this is the thought process that the chap on Jeremy Kyle went through before he -- probably entirely accurately -- gave his 90% estimate of fatherhood.
frogwoman
Let them eat newts
Theroux hasn't even got a wank, never mind a shag, in him.
Bakunin
I am Noodle's bitch.
jesus wept
Sorry.
*Shuffles away, in a shamefaced manner*
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Similar threads
