Jean Charles de Menezes inquest: officers "not at fault"

[detective-boy]

So the facts/explanations provided by the Police are fair, and what they did wasn't wrong?

I suppose it was De Menzies fault that he was perceived to look like a terrorist and act like a terrorist?

Given your responses, I assume you think it's fair for the Met Police to fire blindly at Innocent "Terrorist Suspects"?, Innocent being the key word here.

If you (or any other cunt) actually paid attention to what I've posted on this subject, and if you (or any other cunt) actually read what I have said, and if you (or any other cunt) was actually capable of understanding the meaning of what I posted, then you'd know that your assumption is bollocks.

But the fact is that you and the other fuckwits don't do any of that. Which is why I can't be fucking bothered any more.

 

[detective-boy]

So stop claiming that you've left then.

You really are so fucking stupid that you can't even get that right ... where did I claim that I'd left? (as opposed to giving up engaging with threads whilst fuckwit cunts like you remain in the ascendancy ...) ...

 

[danny la rouge]

You do know quite a lot of swear words, though. Which is nice.

 

[Cowley]

If you (or any other cunt) actually paid attention to what I've posted on this subject, and if you (or any other cunt) actually read what I have said, and if you (or any other cunt) was actually capable of understanding the meaning of what I posted, then you'd know that your assumption is bollocks.

But the fact is that you and the other fuckwits don't do any of that. Which is why I can't be fucking bothered any more.

All you've done is post abuse....

 

[detective-boy]

You do know quite a lot of swear words, though. Which is nice.

I know a lot of cunts, too. Which is fucking tedious ...

 

[detective-boy]

All you've done is post abuse....

Oh yeah. I forgot that the average U75 fuckwit has the retention time of a fucking goldfish ...

 

[danny la rouge]

I know a lot of cunts, too. Which is fucking tedious ...

That's nice, dear.

Cup of tea? May I suggest chamomile?

 

[butchersapron]

Great ruin yet another thread with your teeny tantrums db. Well done.

 

[tarannau]

Doing nicely there DB. So let me get this straight, if people read your posts and still don't agree with you, then that makes them cunts right?

Things don't work like that in the civilian world.

 

[Cowley]

Oh yeah. I forgot that the average U75 fuckwit has the retention time of a fucking goldfish ...

Well from what I've seen of this thread, you've repeatedly posted vile hate filled abuse at any other poster that dares to challenge or question your opinion.

If you have an opinion on the matter and think the Met aren't in the wrong...can you please explain it without going off into one? That's all I ask.

 

[Fedayn]

All you've done is post abuse....

No no, that's reasoned reflection after checking all the facts that it. Well it says so in Cressida Dick's dictionary anyway!

 

[detective-boy]

Well from what I've seen of this thread, you've repeatedly posted vile hate filled abuse at any other poster that dares to challenge or question your opinion.

Imaging things are we? How the fuck can I be directing "vile hate filled abuse" (you a tabloid headline writer by any chance?) at anyone daring to "challenge or question" my opinion when I haven't posted a fucking opinion.

If you have an opinion on the matter and think the Met aren't in the wrong...can you please explain it without going off into one?

No. I've done that dozens of times before and it's a fucking waste of time.

 

[tarannau]

You know, i's perfectly possible that he's implying that you're directing 'vile hate filled abuse' at those who've challenged your opinions in the past.

I do know how you like to pick at any inaccuracies or misrepresentations of posts. That's the usual stage before you go off on one like a prize prat.

 

[butchersapron]

I think he's saying that he's throwing vile hate filled abuse at anyone no matter what. Just leave db. Just go.

 

[tarannau]

Alternatively he just give up the sentences and compose whole posts out of the world 'cunt'. After all, it's not as though he's contributing anything else of substance or use.

 

[danny la rouge]

Do you mean the fact that De Menezes was NEVER identified as a suspect? Do you mean that bit? So a man who was never actually identified as a suspect, was never positively identified as Hussein Osman, who was NEVER positively identified as anyone was shot? Do you mean that bit?

He did walk funny, though.

 

[Kizmet]

All this fucking aggro over Cressida Dick's opinion.

Of course they did something wrong. They shot the wrong guy.

Question is... was anyone guilty of negligence or malpractice. Being wrong is sometimes really ugly.. but it isn't a crime.

Inquest will out.

 

[Cowley]

Imaging things are we? How the fuck can I be directing "vile hate filled abuse" (you a tabloid headline writer by any chance?) at anyone daring to "challenge or question" my opinion when I haven't posted a fucking opinion.

You know what I mean. You agressively respond to anybody that posts an opinion you don't agree with. Happy now.

No. I've done that dozens of times before and it's a fucking waste of time.

So you challenge somebody without offering a defence yourself.......sound familiar does it?

 

[Kizmet]

You know what I mean. You agressively respond to anybody that posts an opinion you don't agree with. Happy now.

You've been here since 2004 and you haven't worked out why, yet?

He takes an unreasonable amount of shit.

 

[danny la rouge]

Read the thread, Kizmet.

 

[detective-boy]

Just leave db. Just go.

Just who do you think you are, prick?

You own this place, eh? You set the rules, do you?

No? Then shut the fuck up, eh? I'll stay here as long as my simple presence continues to annoy you. In fact, seeing as how it does, I think I'll follow you around a bit. Just remember I'll probably be reading everything you post now ...

 

[butchersapron]

Don't bother danny, kizmet is a professional contrarian and defender of the weak - like db. He gives not five figs.

 

[Kizmet]

Read the thread, Kizmet.

Do you really think I'm referring to just this thread?

 

[butchersapron]

Just who do you think you are, prick?

You own this place, eh? You set the rules, do you?

No? Then shut the fuck up, eh? I'll stay here as long as my simple presence continues to annoy you. In fact, seeing as how it does, I think I'll follow you around a bit. Just remember I'll probably be reading everything you post now ...

I would and do welcome this development.

 

[poului]

I would and do welcome this development.

It's funny cos he can't nick you.

 

[Kizmet]

Don't bother danny, kizmet is a professional contrarian and defender of the weak - like db. He gives not five figs.

Whereas you, sir, are merely a knobber sometimes.

 

[Fedayn]

He takes an unreasonable amount of shit.

Which he also dishes out on a regular basis.

 

[Kizmet]

Which he also dishes out on a regular basis.

Under provocation, mostly.

He wouldn't have lasted if he didn't. Others haven't.

 

[detective-boy]

Being wrong is sometimes really ugly.. but it isn't a crime.

You do realise this is U75, don't you? The tabloid law that if it's bad it's someone's fault holds sway here.

Not only is being wrong a crime, failing to have 100% powers to instantly know the true situation is too ...

 

[Fedayn]

Under provocation, mostly.

He wouldn't have lasted if he didn't. Others haven't.

Eh? He get's it back because he abuses those for simply disagreeing withy him. As such he get's it back, not too hard to work out really.