JD Vance's time is up
- Thread starter krtek a houby
- Start date
VivaE
Well-Known Member
Oh agree, a terrible burden, but responsible parents wouldn't put their children in the firing line in the first place so maybe they should just leave the kids at home in the care of someone who actually cares about them and just come on their own to face the likely welcome they'll receive.
Then people can target them with a clear conscience knowing that no children are suffering as a result.
With the added benefit that the Vances wouldn't be able to whine and moan about their poor kids' holiday being ruined.
Bahnhof Strasse
Let's av ya fuckin' dancin'!
I'll give Vance this, he doesn't go around telling lies that he's some kind of super-brain like his boss does.
Bahnhof Strasse
Let's av ya fuckin' dancin'!
Turn your phone around so you're not using the selfie camera.
Bahnhof Strasse
Let's av ya fuckin' dancin'!
I've not really used the selfie camera either - why does it do that? (sorry if daft question)
eta: so it acts like a mirror? but that doesn't really answer my question
Your phone has a camera on the back that you take pictures with, that gives you a true picture. The screen side has the selfie camera, so you can take a picture of yourself whilst looking at the screen to make sure you're looking gorgeous, but that acts as a mirror, as Vance has found out.
I like the way once he turns it upside down his mate thinks that taking the posters off the wall and somehow turning them around might help.
Pic is not showing on your post anymore, but if anyone has insta, it’s still there. Just tap on the post.
bluescreen
tofu eating wokerati
I thought this was interesting from Heather Cox Richardson's latest post. Sounds like an ouster cabal, under the guise of Epstein concern, and the boss got wind of it. Mind you, so much is being viewed through the lens of 'Vance as Project 2025 nominee' that maybe it was simply to discuss handling the Epstein optics. Or maybe the denial is right, that it was never even planned, just a figment of fervid imagination:
Loading…
www.reuters.com
petee
no gods, no managers
emptywheel puts in the time
www.emptywheel.net
How conveniently the story about Vance’s canoe trip popped up just about the time the Epstein conspiracy meeting was making too much trouble for Trump and his conspirators, just about the time Team Trump was desperate enough to think about compromising one of their Epstein skeptics to change the direction of media and public attention.
Tick-Tock: Redirecting Attention from Epstein Coverup Conspiracy - emptywheel
How conveniently the story about Vance's canoe trip popped up just about the time the Epstein conspiracy meeting was making too much trouble for Trump and his conspirators.
www.emptywheel.net
How conveniently the story about Vance’s canoe trip popped up just about the time the Epstein conspiracy meeting was making too much trouble for Trump and his conspirators, just about the time Team Trump was desperate enough to think about compromising one of their Epstein skeptics to change the direction of media and public attention.
izz
rage, rage against the lying of the Right
I'm also of the opinion Vance wants the job intensely but wouldn't have a chance at presidency at this point in his career otherwise (IMO), and this also times well given trump's increasing cognitive issues, given one of Biden's faults in the eyes of the people was his failing intellect. Very convenient for Vance, this Epstein business. Too obvious a move for Vance maybe ? I don't think so. Vance unfortunately, is an infinitely subtler and much nastier man than trump, again IMO. Change my mind
petee
no gods, no managers
cross-post from the Southport thread, also relevant here
Britain was on a knife edge when Lucy Connolly, a mother and former nanny, tapped out an inflammatory 51-word post on social media a year ago, calling for “all” hotels that house asylum seekers to be set on fire. “If that makes me a racist, so be it,” she added, a postscript that did nothing to spare her the wrath of the country’s courts.
Her post was viewed 310,000 times. Now serving a 31-month prison sentence for inciting racial hatred, Ms. Connolly has become a charged symbol in a debate over whether Britain is suppressing free speech. Last month, an appeals court refused to reduce her sentence, drawing angry protests from her defenders, mainly on the political right.
Ms. Connolly’s arrest came during a fevered period after the killing of three young girls by a British son of Rwandan migrants, which ignited anti-immigrant riots across the country. She is one of thousands of people arrested in Britain each year for sending or posting offensive messages, which can include those that are “indecent or grossly offensive” if they are intended to cause distress to the recipient.
Critics, including Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk, accuse Britain of backsliding in the age of social media. They point to a thicket of laws, some old, some new, combined with overly zealous policing, and a perception, on the right and the left, that law enforcement is biased against their points of view.
Britain, they say, is restricting speech in ways that affect “not just the British,” as Mr. Vance put it in February in an Oval Office meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer, “but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizens.”
Mr. Starmer gives no ground when asked to respond to Mr. Vance’s claim that “free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”
“We’ve had free speech in the United Kingdom for a very long time, hundreds of years,” the prime minister said in an interview with The New York Times in March. “But there are exceptions to free speech — pedophiles and terrorists are two of them — and I have no qualms about that.”
Britain was on a knife edge when Lucy Connolly, a mother and former nanny, tapped out an inflammatory 51-word post on social media a year ago, calling for “all” hotels that house asylum seekers to be set on fire. “If that makes me a racist, so be it,” she added, a postscript that did nothing to spare her the wrath of the country’s courts.
Her post was viewed 310,000 times. Now serving a 31-month prison sentence for inciting racial hatred, Ms. Connolly has become a charged symbol in a debate over whether Britain is suppressing free speech. Last month, an appeals court refused to reduce her sentence, drawing angry protests from her defenders, mainly on the political right.
Ms. Connolly’s arrest came during a fevered period after the killing of three young girls by a British son of Rwandan migrants, which ignited anti-immigrant riots across the country. She is one of thousands of people arrested in Britain each year for sending or posting offensive messages, which can include those that are “indecent or grossly offensive” if they are intended to cause distress to the recipient.
Critics, including Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk, accuse Britain of backsliding in the age of social media. They point to a thicket of laws, some old, some new, combined with overly zealous policing, and a perception, on the right and the left, that law enforcement is biased against their points of view.
Britain, they say, is restricting speech in ways that affect “not just the British,” as Mr. Vance put it in February in an Oval Office meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer, “but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizens.”
Mr. Starmer gives no ground when asked to respond to Mr. Vance’s claim that “free speech, I fear, is in retreat.”
“We’ve had free speech in the United Kingdom for a very long time, hundreds of years,” the prime minister said in an interview with The New York Times in March. “But there are exceptions to free speech — pedophiles and terrorists are two of them — and I have no qualms about that.”
breadandcircuse
Petulant gobshites against whingeing twats cohort
Good to see C4 showing the protests against the creature. I haven't seen other platforms doing that. Let him know he's not welcome. One lady mentioned her friend having her house searched by security. How fucking dare they? Just because a twat of a politician decides to holiday in your village, after slagging us off, they think they have the right to go into your house! Well the protestors showed him we do have free speech here, contrary to what he lies about.
I see he's meeting Farage tomorrow. Does anyone know where? Just asking for a friend who may want to welcome them too.
I see he's meeting Farage tomorrow. Does anyone know where? Just asking for a friend who may want to welcome them too.
HeAthen
Nadgers.
Maybe they could have a double milkshake!
moochedit
Why isn't the christmas forum open yet?
Aladdin
John 3:16 Mathew 4:19 16:26 John 14:6 8:32
teqniq
DisMembered
Read this after reading something on twitter about the police going house to house asking who lived there and what their social media accounts are. It's true. All for J D Vance. I would, of course be telling them to go forth and multiply if I lived there:
observer.co.uk
Pat down the golden retrievers: Cotswolds put on high ale...
With helicopters whirring overhead and police quizzing residents, rural life is anything but tranquil
observer.co.uk
teqniq
DisMembered
What a circus. I guess we'll be footing at least some of the bill. J D Vance motorcade in Chipping Norton:
View attachment ssstwitter.com_1755071782816.mp4
source
View attachment ssstwitter.com_1755071782816.mp4
source
platinumsage
Well-Known Member
Zero sympathy for leafy villager dwellers moaning about a police presence making their dog walk slightly inconvenient.
krtek a houby
Saoirse don Phalaistín!
You'd be happy to have a fascist motorcade on your doorstep, stressing out the animals, of course
Dystopiary
The system isn't broken; it's rigged.
It's Chipping Norton ffs, not somewhere normal people live.
krtek a houby
Saoirse don Phalaistín!
But the dogs
Dystopiary
The system isn't broken; it's rigged.
I don't think there's anything untoward happening to dogs because of that dickhead's presence.
skyscraper101
0891 50 50 50
David Lammy refers himself to watchdog after fishing with US vice president
The foreign secretary's failure to buy a valid rod licence was described as an "administrative error", but it could have netted him a fine of up to £2,500 - even though he did not catch anything.
Lammy in Rod Licence scandal.
But what about Vance? And his kids? Did they have rod licences?
locallondoner
Well-Known Member
He probably has immunity. I think they spare the rod for anyone with immunityDavid Lammy refers himself to watchdog after fishing with US vice president
The foreign secretary's failure to buy a valid rod licence was described as an "administrative error", but it could have netted him a fine of up to £2,500 - even though he did not catch anything.news.sky.com
Lammy in Rod Licence scandal.
But what about Vance? And his kids? Did they have rod licences?
I’ll get me coat
LakieLady
Well-Known Member
What a missed opportunity! I'd have felt compelled to push the fucker into the water.
Similar threads
