Wolveryeti
Detty Pig
She is an electoral liability. At best she will be shunted off to some backwater like DEFRA in the next reshuffle.
Good riddance to the embezzling shitcunt.
Jacqui Smith's Husband Porn Subscribtions
- Thread starter Dozy
- Start date
She is an electoral liability. At best she will be shunted off to some backwater like DEFRA in the next reshuffle.
Good riddance to the embezzling shitcunt.
Putting to one side the houses, porn and expenses for a short moment. 
In December, Richard Timney (Jacqui's husband) was caught out writing shitloads of anonymous letters to the local press, praising her policies. Are these the actions of a straight-forward, fair playing, honest person?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...sband-behind-series-of-defensive-letters.html
Surely he should be given the sack as her adviser? He more than likely does her expenses for her.
In December, Richard Timney (Jacqui's husband) was caught out writing shitloads of anonymous letters to the local press, praising her policies. Are these the actions of a straight-forward, fair playing, honest person?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...sband-behind-series-of-defensive-letters.html
Surely he should be given the sack as her adviser? He more than likely does her expenses for her.
denniseagle
ding dong the witch is dead
Information a bit too precise?
As a Virgin customer who has the tv,telephone and broadband package,I get my monthly bill via email (e billing).
I have the xl package which costs £56 per month.
This 'saves' me £1.25 each month because I do not recieve a paper bill.
To access my bill I have to type in my account name and more importantly MY PASSWORD, which I change regularly.
If I have to telephone Virgin to query anything concerning my bill I have to quote my account number and a different password, along with answering a question relating to me personally (not mothers maiden name but along similar lines) that I had chosen when setting up my account with Virgin.
Failure to answer the question correctly means no access to my account information.
Accessing my account via the net only gives the basic billing information
it enables me to see what the bill is, if I have had a pay per view item, ie any type of film it just says, pay per view, the time and date , not what was purchased.
I will admit to having payed for an adult channel once on pay per view at a cost of £5 (total waste of money lol) was but again it did not specify what was purchased.
Therefore just how was the rather too detailed information obtained?
The names of the channels he purchased and the titles of the films he watched, plus the statement that he only watched a 'few minutes' of one of the films he purchased.
None of that information would be found on an e bill nor on a paper one.
When you buy any film you have 16 hours in which to watch it , and you can view it more than once in that time period.It does not specify how long nor how many times the programme was viewed on your bill.
The details emerging concerning this episode seem too precise , my only thought is that someone at Virgin obtained the details at the request of a third party.
As for the expenses lark wasn't it dear Maggie who set up the system rather than give MP's a pay rise sometime back in the early 1980's?
Another one of her time bombs set to go off long after she had left office.
As a Virgin customer who has the tv,telephone and broadband package,I get my monthly bill via email (e billing).
I have the xl package which costs £56 per month.
This 'saves' me £1.25 each month because I do not recieve a paper bill.
To access my bill I have to type in my account name and more importantly MY PASSWORD, which I change regularly.
If I have to telephone Virgin to query anything concerning my bill I have to quote my account number and a different password, along with answering a question relating to me personally (not mothers maiden name but along similar lines) that I had chosen when setting up my account with Virgin.
Failure to answer the question correctly means no access to my account information.
Accessing my account via the net only gives the basic billing information
it enables me to see what the bill is, if I have had a pay per view item, ie any type of film it just says, pay per view, the time and date , not what was purchased.
I will admit to having payed for an adult channel once on pay per view at a cost of £5 (total waste of money lol) was but again it did not specify what was purchased.
Therefore just how was the rather too detailed information obtained?
The names of the channels he purchased and the titles of the films he watched, plus the statement that he only watched a 'few minutes' of one of the films he purchased.
None of that information would be found on an e bill nor on a paper one.
When you buy any film you have 16 hours in which to watch it , and you can view it more than once in that time period.It does not specify how long nor how many times the programme was viewed on your bill.
The details emerging concerning this episode seem too precise , my only thought is that someone at Virgin obtained the details at the request of a third party.
As for the expenses lark wasn't it dear Maggie who set up the system rather than give MP's a pay rise sometime back in the early 1980's?
Another one of her time bombs set to go off long after she had left office.
gentlegreen
I hummus, therefore I am ...
I hadn't considered that - they would never have bothered putting the movie title on the bill - especially a naughty one. The plot thickens ...
I wonder if the bills are even processed in the UK - pretty sure when my modem melted it was someone in another country I spoke to on the phone as per usual ...
... otherwise it might have been one of the interminable paper bills I end up shredding ... time to go e-bill - thanks ... maybe I'll see if there's a film I might like to see ( a non-porn one
)...
I wonder if the bills are even processed in the UK - pretty sure when my modem melted it was someone in another country I spoke to on the phone as per usual ...
... otherwise it might have been one of the interminable paper bills I end up shredding ... time to go e-bill - thanks ... maybe I'll see if there's a film I might like to see ( a non-porn one
)...
Wonder how much journalists have claimed in that time?
Paulie Tandoori
shut it you egg!
I wasn't aware that journalists were supposed to be acting as public servants and understanding of the wider issues affecting the voting populace tbf
I wasn't aware that journalists were supposed to be acting as public servants and understanding of the wider issues affecting the voting populace tbf
BBC?
The hypocrisy on the issue goes a lot deeper than elected MPs. Do you not think there is a much bigger issue of lack of public accountability and sleaze?
Paulie Tandoori
shut it you egg!
Oh do fuck off and stop trying to deflect from the issue at hand, there's a good boy.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Depends what kind of "talents" there are left on the Labour benches for Brown to draw on. Given that a lot of the minister-level "talent" are yes-men, there's not a lot of real expertise for Brown to draw on, so he may advise Smith to see whether she can ride this one out until a decent replacement can be groomed.
Wolveryeti
Detty Pig
Who. gives. a. fuck.
They are not in receipt of taxpayer money. That is the issue at stake. The massive trousering of taxpayer cash. Why are we fucking paying for Jacqui's husband to wank?
This is of course a beautiful piece of poetic justice, as Simon Jenkins points out.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/01/jacqui-smith-expenses
maomao
普費斯
BBC journalists are.
gentlegreen
I hummus, therefore I am ...
rant
Watching all the goings-on today, I was struck by what an incompetent bunch of tossers we're paying for.
At the very least they're supposed to be looking after the money and they've left it in the hands of crooks.
This particular over-paid waste of space is doing nothing that most of us here couldn't do - you would think that she could at least have got drugs sorted - it isn't rocket science. I feel embarassed that I use attitudes to cannabis use as an index, but it'll do for me.
/rant
Watching all the goings-on today, I was struck by what an incompetent bunch of tossers we're paying for.
At the very least they're supposed to be looking after the money and they've left it in the hands of crooks.
This particular over-paid waste of space is doing nothing that most of us here couldn't do - you would think that she could at least have got drugs sorted - it isn't rocket science. I feel embarassed that I use attitudes to cannabis use as an index, but it'll do for me.
/rant
ethel
Well-Known Member
the thick of it is scarily acurate again. clip from the new film: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid18178123001?bctid=18230930001
Jonti
what the dormouse said
Simon Jenkins points out that
Well, your dream has come true Jacqui. Seems there are now no barriers preventing us from effectively sharing data about mendacious and thieving politicians, their families and friends.
It's public service you can believe in!
in the face
New Member
Champagne socialists (Tories) turn over the working class shocker.
Plus they got a pay rise the other day.
Ha ha, don't bother to show your bias!
Most grass roots Tories detest this crap, no matter what quarter it's from. The system allows for abuse and the 'honourable members' are trained and expected to exploit it to the max. It's immoral and disgraceful. If I tried to claim foer half this tsuff I would be right royally screwed by by company and HMRC!
Wolveryeti
Detty Pig
Heheheh. Brilliant! 
Similar threads
