Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

It's official - Tories announce Boris for mayor!

Haller said:
Does the Mayor actually have any power that might make a difference?

It appears so, according to Ken, (speaking live at the Labour party conference at the moment) He is imposing a compulsory purchase order on some land one of the London councils refuses to develop.
 
Haller said:
Does the Mayor actually have any power that might make a difference?

What kind of power do you mean? With respect to poverty in London he has the power to influence wages. He has set the Living Wage in London at £7.20 making it easier for unions to claim better conditions. He's been resolute on affordable housing, preventing luxury-style flats being built without a percentage being allocated as social housing. http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/article...es-50000-New-Affordable-Homes&article_id=1166

He's also made transport more affordable and more reliable...
 
citydreams said:
What kind of power do you mean? With respect to poverty in London he has the power to influence wages. He has set the Living Wage in London at £7.20 making it easier for unions to claim better conditions. He's been resolute on affordable housing, preventing luxury-style flats being built without a percentage being allocated as social housing. He's made transport more affordable and more reliable.


Exactly the Mayor of London has control over transport, development /planning, waste management with greater powers in the pipe line.

What is Boris's transport plan.. "gosh chaps.. Giles & Sophie got held up in their Range Rover on Notting Hill by one of those dreadful bendy bus thingys.. I know lets get rid of them (the bendy buses, not Giles, Sophie & their Range Rover, unfortuneatly..)
 
Andy the Don said:
What is Boris's transport plan..

(From what I've read)

Retain the Congestion Charge
New London double decker inspired by the old routemaster to replace the bendy buses
Air Con on the tube
Strong supporter of Crossrail
Extend DLR and East London Line

and no prizes for guessing this one.......strongly pro-bicycle.

Sources include
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/interviews/2007/09/boris-johnson-a.html#more
and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6975796.stm
 
Air con is impossible on the deep tube, there's no way to get the heat out.
 
Bodmass said:
(From what I've read)

Retain the Congestion Charge
New London double decker inspired by the old routemaster to replace the bendy buses
Air Con on the tube
Strong supporter of Crossrail
Extend DLR and East London Line

and no prizes for guessing this one.......strongly pro-bicycle.

Sources include
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/interviews/2007/09/boris-johnson-a.html#more
and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6975796.stm

Retain congestion charge, but not extend it westwards - don't want to upset Giles & Sophie aka your core voters.

New double decker, great if you are not elderly, disabled or using a pram/buggy.

Aircon on tubes - impossible unless you are willing to throw vast sums at the problem.

Crossrail & DLR/East London line - same as Ken basically..
 
Crispy said:
Air con is impossible on the deep tube, there's no way to get the heat out.

It's these sorts of questions he will need to answer, Crispy, if he really is a credible alternative to Livingstone.
 
I heard Boris on the news a few weeks back, flummering on about how he'd reduce bike crime by encouraging other cyclists to shout out if they saw a bike being nicked. Genius!
 
Andy the Don said:
Retain congestion charge, but not extend it westwards - don't want to upset Giles & Sophie aka your core voters.

He hasn't said anything about scrapping the Western Extension so I assume he will keep the existing extended zone
New double decker, great if you are not elderly, disabled or using a pram/buggy.
I don't think there is a tremendous problem with using *modern* DDs (no-one could pretend the old routemaster was disabled friendly....), but obviously that depends on able bodied people being prepared to go upstairs if the bus gets busy.
Aircon on tubes - impossible unless you are willing to throw vast sums at the problem.
See above- he needs to flesh this one out if it was a real promise and not just a quick throwaway line
Crossrail & DLR/East London line - same as Ken basically..

Indeed- he needs to say *why* he would be better at running these things than Ken.

Much to be done, Mr Johnson. But there is time.
 
chymaera said:
How many people here could take an English History exam at degree level with no revision and get a 1st?
Where did you find out this information? Was it from one of Boris Johnson’s own newspaper columns or editorials, by chance? Who, apart from Johnson would know whether or not he revised for examinations?

Wasn’t Jeffrey Archer once a Tory candidate for the London Mayoral position; and, wasn’t he a committed self-publicist, as well a convicted perjurer?
 
I suppose it would be good if he wins in that everyone would be reminded what happens when you put the Tories in charge and we wouldn't have to endanger a nice part of the country to make the point.

It's a bit sad that there's no viable opposition these days.
 
Urbanblues said:
You watched him not revising?

It was dropped on him totally out of the blue to make him put his money where his mouth is on the subject of exams now being easier. He shot the program makers down in flames by getting a 1st. (It has to be said it was as much a surprise to him as it was to them.)
 
You heard it it here first - Boris won't win.

He may have a chance if all of London was like Kensington and Chelsea but it's not and his comment about Black children being 'smiling picaninnes with watermelon smiles' will be used by Labour for all it's worth.

The playing of municipal racial politics, mastered by the Democratic party in the big US cities in the 70's-80's, have been deployed by Ken and his team with a great deal of success. Boris will be hung out to dry and, sure, he may garner the middle class White voters in places like Bromley but his selection shows the Tory party have given up on ever winning the Mayorship given London's racial and social make-up and is just using him to increase it's profile.
 
PaulOK said:
...but his selection shows the Tory party have given up on ever winning the Mayorship given London's racial and social make-up and is just using him to increase it's profile.
Sounds ok to me.
 
Me too Urbanblues - I hate all the Blue fuckers, have done since the 80's! It's just that some people think this prick actually has a chance.
 
PaulOK said:
Me too Urbanblues - I hate all the Blue fuckers, have done since the 80's! It's just that some people think this prick actually has a chance.

More of a chance than Paddick, (but that is still not much of a chance.)
 
Urbanblues said:
Wasn’t Jeffrey Archer once a Tory candidate for the London Mayoral position; and, wasn’t he a committed self-publicist, as well a convicted perjurer?

same old...

from wiki

Upon graduating from Oxford he lasted a week as a management consultant ("Try as I might, I could not look at an overhead projection of a growth profit matrix, and stay conscious"), before becoming a trainee reporter for The Times. Within a year he was sacked for falsifying a quotation from his godfather, Colin Lucas, later vice-chancellor of Oxford University.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Johnson
 
Red Jezza said:
nothing secret about a society whose main result is to get its' members loudly, publically and obnoxiously drunk


Unless things have dramatically changed in Oxford in recent years the society has a VERY big membership. :D
 
PaulOK said:
Me too Urbanblues - I hate all the Blue fuckers, have done since the 80's! It's just that some people think this prick actually has a chance.
Just for the Record, my blues are as a result of a curious Celtic fatalism, not the Tory kind.
 
Back
Top Bottom