DexterTCN
Troy and Abed in the morning
oh sorry did i use a long word?
No, but some grammar and punctuation would be nice.

oh sorry did i use a long word?

How boring!politics is about the acheivable


No, you fuckwit. It could lose by Israelis refusing to carry out the genocidal war aims of the IDF and telling their bosses they can stuff their wars and their neo-liberal offensive against the w/c up their arses and instead reaching out to their class brothers and sisters among the Palestinians.how could it lose spion? if hundreds of israeli kids died? that woudl only happen if tens of thousends of palestinians died too? or if sderot was blown away? and if that happenned gaza city would be dresdened
Im hoping that Barack Obama feels the same way. Hes the best hope we have. Im hoping that he can work with the EU to completely stop selling arms to the region - both sides. Its heinous and inhuman. Id rather be poor than profit from that.
.........If you read between the lines there is a lot of love shown on this board. I think we all share the same values of compassion and love. It seems that sometimes gets lost in the detail.

oh sorry did i use a long word?

you want to change israel/palestine .. change your street first

you want to change israel/palestine .. change your street first
How you manage to miss the point quite so consistently is a puzzle to me.how could it lose spion? if hundreds of israeli kids died? that woudl only happen if tens of thousends of palestinians died too? or if sderot was blown away?
Like Rafah, you mean?and if that happenned gaza city would be dresdened
That would be hilarious if it didn't illustrate just how far away from having any point your witterings are.no israel was NEVER going to lose .. and to call for it to do so is nonsense .. we must only call for what we can acheive .. and this is why it is crap and irrelevent .. and by a bunch of bullshiote academics .. maybe they should try to deal with something real where they live but stuck in their post modern ivory towers they have no sense fo reality.
Please tell me exactly who this UK left is comprised of, because I was labouring under the presumption that there was no such homogeneous entity.politics is about the acheivable and the UTTER failure of the uk left is based in its fetishim of the far away the unacheivable and the irrelevent ..
Sometimes parochialism is a good thing, other times it's utterly irrelevant. At the moment it's the latter.you want to change israel/palestine .. change your street first
No, you fuckwit. It could lose by Israelis refusing to carry out the genocidal war aims of the IDF and telling their bosses they can stuff their wars and their neo-liberal offensive against the w/c up their arses and instead reaching out to their class brothers and sisters among the Palestinians.
Get some fucking left wing politics will you!!!
maybe if people did it here first then we could help the palestinians!! without power all the morals and appeals in the world are empty and meaningless .. the sooner the left understand this the betterHow boring!
No, politics is about struggle. And that will go on whatever the UK left do, say or even exist.![]()
telling the bosses to stuff their war and their neo-liberal assault on the w/c is middle class now is it?you are, like so many lefties, living in a fantasy world spion .. utter fantasy .. get some basics mate .. have a re read of some IWCA stuff .. proper working class politics instead of your daft middle class fantasys
so the war / attacks are over for now .. and israel won .. it massacred 1200 palestinans without a major reaction against it .. are we then now to spend the next period building up solidairty and neglecting YET again local work?? VP until we have power we are impotent in these strugglesHow you manage to miss the point quite so consistently is a puzzle to me.
It's not about force of arms, the state of Israel has shown that to be the case from the very start of this offensive, it's about them winning or losing the media war, and what that grip on the media represents, i.e. the dominant discourse. If the state of Israel can be shown, despite the best efforts of politicians and media outlets around the world, to be presenting falsehood as truth, to be acting in oppression rather than defence, then they lose, and lose they must, or the slaughter won't stop.
Like Rafah, you mean?
That would be hilarious if it didn't illustrate just how far away from having any point your witterings are.
Please tell me exactly who this UK left is comprised of, because I was labouring under the presumption that there was no such homogeneous entity.
Sometimes parochialism is a good thing, other times it's utterly irrelevant. At the moment it's the latter.
yes cos as it is meanigngless it benefits no one but the m/c .. get stuck into some real work spion .. what happenned to openly classist! loltelling the bosses to stuff their war and their neo-liberal assault on the w/c is middle class now is it?
The world is turned upside down
Thing is what does 'lose' mean here?
For Barak and Livni as far as I can figure it out, 'winning' appears to consist of inflicting enough damage on Gaza to look tougher than Netanyahu and hence to head off the surge in popularity that the Israeli far(ther) right have been experiencing since Olmert made an arse of himself against Hezbollah.
So I guess 'losing' in this context could mean a situation in which it turned out that Israeli military casualities inflicted by Hamas were much worse than have been declared so far. This seems unlikely to me.
What the people who wrote the letter seem to envisage though, is a situation where Israel was held accountable for the war crimes it has committed in Gaza, and became subject to embargo and so on by the international community.
This would presumably be intended to send some sort of 'crime doesn't pay' message to the Israeli government, but it's not at all clear to me that it would do that, rather than having the less desirable effect of making the incumbents appear even tougher to whatever segment of the Israeli voting public it is that apparently measures candidates fitness for office by the number of war crimes they're being accused of by the UN, Red Cross etc.
Really?so the war / attacks are over for now ..
There was I thinking that there have been major reactions against it, like for example, the UN even talking of bringing war crimes charges (something they've never even countenanced before).and israel won .. it massacred 1200 palestinans without a major reaction against it ..
You may be lazy enough to believe that one can only concentrate on a single field of endeavour at a time, but some of us are capable of "multi-tasking. Doing one doesn't mean ignoring the other.are we then now to spend the next period building up solidairty and neglecting YET again local work?? VP until we have power we are impotent in these struggles
There was I thinking that there have been major reactions against it, like for example, the UN even talking of bringing war crimes charges (something they've never even countenanced before).
What's wrong with his street?
How many kids died there today? Was his street built on many homes? Does his street massacre? Kill? Maim?
the far away the unacheivable and the irrelevent
I can't argue with the sentiments of the letter published here by the OP. It's quite clear the path to peace between Arab, Christian and Jew cannot be paved with the bodies of small children, blown apart from huge bombs dropped by cowards from the skies. War is not Peace, no matter how far along the Orwellian Doublespeak culture we have gone.

They're not going to actually do anything effective though, are they?
It's not a Nicosia style Greek Cypriot -> UN ->Turkish Cypriot border intervention equivalent being proposed? They're not going to entirely piss off the US?
They're treading water and making the right noises until the US, Israel and possibly Egypt come up with a solution that effectively takes the Israeli position further forward (but not tooooo much further forward, mind) but without too much loss of face for all interested.

I think that's fairly obvious.
That said, they've crossed a line that they hadn't previously, which means that next time (and there will, G-d forgive us, be a next time) there's a precedent for going further.
The big issue should be to sideline the US as much as possible from a lead role in any negotiations without, as you put it, entirely pissing them off. A "peace process" led by the US is an automatic route to another 15 years of waffling, equivocation and pro-Israel partisanship.

indeed.
![]()
The hype may be unearnt, and his appointments so far aren't exactly a cause for joy in the most part, but... better than dubya, surely?Doesn't bode well, does it? (She asked, rhetorically)
The hype may be unearnt, and his appointments so far aren't exactly a cause for joy in the most part, but... better than dubya, surely?
He's a better public speaker, that's for sure. As to the rest, I guess we'll have to wait and see whether US foreign policy differs from business as usual.
Really?
There was I thinking that there have been major reactions against it, like for example, the UN even talking of bringing war crimes charges (something they've never even countenanced before).
You may be lazy enough to believe that one can only concentrate on a single field of endeavour at a time, but some of us are capable of "multi-tasking. Doing one doesn't mean ignoring the other.
israel has been condemned at the UN many times ..
israel has been condemned at the UN many times ..
in the recent history of the middle east this was not the worst of israels crimes .. nor the worst of it's conflicts ( arafat alleges Jordan massacred 25,000 palestinians in 'black september' ).. and there was not a major reaction in the west bank and jordan or lebanon
israel did what it wanted to .. olmert showed he is a tough guy .. they showed their determination ( intransigence) to the new US president .. they took out some key hamas players .. and terrorised gaza .. and it lost a minimal amount of soldiers and civilians ( remember thousends of israelis have died in suicide and rocket attacks )
