Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Islamophobes 'r' us

bluestreak said:
all people who use religion as a way of restricting the life, rights, freedoms and responsibilities of others, whether the pope and his stance on contraception, the zionists who use the bible as an excuse to repress the palestinians, the imams and mullah who encourage the dispossed to suicide atrocities, our glorious leaders who are subtly trying to make islam an enemy.

also enemies are racists of every hue.

i've no real problem with religious people per se. whatever gets them through their day. but justifying prejudice and greed and hatred on religious grounds makes 'em my enemy.

and members of the left who ally themselves with the forces of religious conservatism and then make racist accusations against anyone whose not on team. they're my enemy too.

people who aren't my enemy: decent, tolerant, and honest human beings regardless of belief system. hot chicks.


Agreed - nice post. Esp the hot chicks.
 
llantwit said:
It's not pathetic to criticise organised religion as an enemy of working class interests, the ally of those who weild power over the majority, and a repressive force for bad in the world generally. For me that's just obvious.

Always beware of anything that seems "obvious." FWIW, I'd agree with you about *organized* religion, but that wasn't what the article was attacking. It was attacking religion in general. Such attacks are indeed pathetic, and ignorant and reactionary to boot.
 
Yossarian said:
I don't think there's anything at all wrong with pointing out that Islam's a heap of shit just like any other religion, as long as care is taken to be completely even-handed and condemn all religions equally!

Even by your own consistently high standards, this is a remarkably accomplished piece of ignorant drivel. You know nothing of any religion, as you have demonstrated on these boards many times. Therefore, you should keep quiet until you have learned something. For me, that's just obvious.
 
Suggestion duly noted. Found anyone else to believe in your version of "the Creator" yet, you puffed-up, self-important fool? :D

fsm-thumb.jpg
 
thanks class war

youve just alienated yourself from every young muslim boy under the boot of the old bill in bradford, every palestian whose just seen their house bulldozed, every iraqi whos seen their village carpet bombed

please do not presume to argue that you represent the anarchist movement in any way

freedom of belief is pretty important in my view, all organised/personal religion can be challenged, tattacked, satirised, why pick islam why now?

Thus we are proud to be Islamophobic, just as we are proud to be ‘Christianophic’, ‘Judeophobic’, ‘Hindoophobic’, ‘Buddhaphobic’, and whatever other mumbo- jumbo bullshit that the black crows of the Priestocracy try to foist upon us.

you stupid fucking wankers, would you consider yourselves anti-semetic?

well done class war for once again alienating the working class completely, you silly people
 
phildwyer said:
Even by your own consistently high standards, this is a remarkably accomplished piece of ignorant drivel. You know nothing of any religion, as you have demonstrated on these boards many times. Therefore, you should keep quiet until you have learned something. For me, that's just obvious.

I can't understand why you so frequently feel it necessary to act like a bloody fool. :(
 
bluestreak said:
all people who use religion as a way of restricting the life, rights, freedoms and responsibilities of others, whether the pope and his stance on contraception, the zionists who use the bible as an excuse to repress the palestinians, the imams and mullah who encourage the dispossed to suicide atrocities, our glorious leaders who are subtly trying to make islam an enemy.

also enemies are racists of every hue.

i've no real problem with religious people per se. whatever gets them through their day. but justifying prejudice and greed and hatred on religious grounds makes 'em my enemy.

and members of the left who ally themselves with the forces of religious conservatism and then make racist accusations against anyone whose not on team. they're my enemy too.

people who aren't my enemy: decent, tolerant, and honest human beings regardless of belief system. hot chicks.

Fair enough. When I refer to Islamophobia I mean anti-muslim racism rather than reasoned criticism of Islam consistant with other criticism of other doctrines.

It is a cause of concern for me that Muslims are regularly demonised in the mainstream press, targeted by fascists and suffer acts of violence and discrimination in this country.

I think that Islamophobia Watch is often a useful tool in understanding, countering and documenting this worrying trend although I don't agree with it's over the top attacks on Outrage! or it's attempts to defend the reactionary cleric Qaradawi, but on the whole a useful resource.

I also think that Darren RedParty has finally taken leave of his tiny little mind, but I guess that's a manditory requirement for membership of Class War.
 
fair does hating all religions orgainsied or not lets face it
rowan actinson and peter tachtell are not beating people up if its a choice between the likes of them and some religous type
pass me one of mrs miggins meat pies :D
think class war has ther irght idea for once :D
 
Has everyone in Class War now got an executive position:-Darren Redparty-International Secretary.

IF GOD DOES NOT EXIST IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO INVENT HIM!
IF GOD DOES EXIST IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO KILL HIM!!!!:D :mad:
 
Nigel said:
Has everyone in Class War now got an executive position:-Darren Redparty-International Secretary.

Yes I am Executive Officer, Office Services (Elastic Bands and Paper Clips)
 
fair does hating all religions orgainsied or not lets face it
rowan actinson and peter tachtell are not beating people up if its a choice between the likes of them and some religous type

so everyone religous is a twat ffs

can you define religion, does it include anyone who has any kind of belief that isnt based in western empiricist, rationalist logic

you know the scientific atheist rationalists, the vivesectors, biological waepons manufacturers, gm bods

some religious people are twats, some athiests are twats, some muslims are twats, some christians are twats

why make a point of attacking islam right now when islamic people face dangerous levels of prejudice in this country, and lethal levels of prejudice abroad

this is a real fuck up for class war, and shows a dangerous mentality imo, theres a very scary undercurrent of left and hard right forces joining up to have a go at muslims right now

something similar happened once before
 
smokedout said:
why make a point of attacking islam right now when islamic people face dangerous levels of prejudice in this country, and lethal levels of prejudice abroad


it's precisely now that islam should be challenged.it's gaining more and more support around the world.
more and more young people are being dragged into it's way of thinking and so it should be challenged.

It's a good post from the original poster if perhaps badly worded.

sites like islamaphobe need to be told that there are many who do hate islam and what it stands for.
 
I hate orgainised religion not muslims or christians or spaghetti monsterism:rolleyes:
Problem I see with the fanatical type of muslim in the UK is they demand respect and rights that they'd deny in a heart beat if the boot was on the other foot :(
 
A definition from Tariq Ramadan which seems to fit with what some of the more sane contributors on this thread are saying:

'To criticise the religion and Muslims is not Islamophobia; a critical attitude towards religion must be accepted. But to criticise someone or discriminate against them only because they are Muslim—this is what we can call Islamophobia, this is a kind of racism.'

I'm sure Islamaphobiawatch will inore the tinny sound of Class War shouting 'yeah but we REALLY hate the prophet - go on, have a go, I dare ya'

A bit like the Black Night in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
 
mutley said:
A definition from Tariq Ramadan which seems to fit with what some of the more sane contributors on this thread are saying:

'To criticise the religion and Muslims is not Islamophobia; a critical attitude towards religion must be accepted. But to criticise someone or discriminate against them only because they are Muslim—this is what we can call Islamophobia, this is a kind of racism.'

I'm sure Islamaphobiawatch will inore the tinny sound of Class War shouting 'yeah but we REALLY hate the prophet - go on, have a go, I dare ya'

A bit like the Black Night in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Absolutely...because Islamaphobiawatch.com is SOOO huge and inspired and intrinsically intwined in the psyche of the nation.
 
you’ll find numerous insults to both mohammed (piss on him)
wow, what an intelligent critique of Islam and religion...you'll really win people round with such a sophisticated argument as that! :rolleyes:
 
But to criticise someone or discriminate against them only because they are Muslim—this is what we can call Islamophobia, this is a kind of racism.

exact;y, because phobia implies irrational fear or hatred
 
'To criticise the religion and Muslims is not Islamophobia; a critical attitude towards religion must be accepted. But to criticise someone or discriminate against them only because they are Muslim—this is what we can call Islamophobia, this is a kind of racism.'

Amazingly exactly the same difference between having a go at Zionists and being anti-semitic.

However, subtle distnctions, and a habit of making the religious identity merge into the personal means that as with some Jews, criticism of the religion is bigotry because it becomes an attack on the person not the insitution.

But what do you expect from sky-pixie worshippers?
 
Tariq Ramadan said:
But to criticise someone or discriminate against them only because they are Muslim—this is what we can call Islamophobia, this is a kind of racism.
Since when was "Muslim" a race?
 
I think the key words there are 'kind of...' since it's prejudiced behaviour based solely around a person being a muslim (as opposed to them simply being a twat)

However, that doesn't work either since if you criticise someone for holding say, conservative religious beliefs your criticism is entirely based around their being muslim/Xtian etc and that makes you XXX-phobic.

Load of bollocks frankly - if I discriminate on the basis of something people ultimately have a choice in (i.e. their religion) I'm not being racist, just a bigot.
 
In Bloom said:
Since when was "Muslim" a race?

Since when was 'immigrant' a race? Since when was 'Asylum Seeker' a race? Racism isn't a set of beliefs that is scientific or particularly honest is it? Racism hides behind ideas of culture not just skin colour. 'Those dark skinned people are ok provided they change their beliefs and culture to that which I find acceptable' is a racist position to hold.

Since Muslims are being targeted by racists of all hues the priority is to defend Muslims. Joining in the attack but masking it behind a supposed progressive opposition to all religion is inexcusable. Perhaps certain leftists and Anarchists would have prioritised opposition to Judaism had they found themselves in 1930s Germany?

Religion is not in of itself the enemy, and supression of religious belief (as opposed to criticism) is never progressive. The mainstream pro-capitalist, pro-Globalisation ideas in our society are just as unscientific at root as any religion. Muslims are among the poorest and most oppressed people inm our society.
 
Would people find Xenophobia be a more appropriate and inclusive word?

For example, if Max Horkheimer were reincarnated in Luther Blissett, he would most certainly be saying this today:
"The root of fascist agitation is the fact that there is something rotten in language itself... We must beware of the idea that the fascist use of language is something new in our society... The distrust of the Unskilled against the Professional with his mastery of language... is an element of Xenophobia*... in the prehistory of what you explain as the fascist handling of language."

Eclipse of Reason

Max Horkheimer (February 14, 1895 – July 7, 1973) was a Jewish-German philosopher and sociologist, known especially as the founder and guiding thinker of the Frankfurt School of critical theory.

Horkheimer's book, Eclipse of Reason deals with the concept of "reason" within the history of Western philosophy. Horkheimer defines true reason as rationality. He details the difference between objective and subjective reason and states that we have moved from objective to subjective. Objective reason deals with universal truths that dictate that an action is either right or wrong. Subjective reason takes into account the situation and social norms. Actions that produce the best situation for the individual are "reasonable" according to subjective reason. The movement from one type of reason to the other occurred when thought could no longer accommodate these objective truths or when it judged them to be delusions. Under subjective reason, concepts lose their meaning. All concepts must be strictly functional to be reasonable. Because subjective reason rules, the ideals of a society, for example democratic ideals, become dependent on the "interests" of the people instead of being dependent on objective truths.
[Study] Eclipse of Reason
Max Horkheimer 1946

*Horkheimer in a letter to Lowenthal of July 1946 used the term anti-Semitism
 
xenophobia is a much better word and covers it all bases without giving islam special favours.
as most of the people who are islamaphbic hate sikhs hindus and others as well.
:(
and its not a made up word
 
And I'll say 'The same as everyone else little Johnny - absolutely sweet FA because no one could agree on what class they were, most of the left had by that point successfully alienated most of their natural support so all that was left were the facists and the statist-democrats. Which is why everything is so completely FUCKED for you'
 
X-77 said:
wow, what an intelligent critique of Islam and religion...you'll really win people round with such a sophisticated argument as that! :rolleyes:
This is Class War for fucks' sake - not new left review.
 
Groucho said:
Since when was 'immigrant' a race? Since when was 'Asylum Seeker' a race? Racism isn't a set of beliefs that is scientific or particularly honest is it? Racism hides behind ideas of culture not just skin colour. 'Those dark skinned people are ok provided they change their beliefs and culture to that which I find acceptable' is a racist position to hold.
That's not racism, it's xenophobia. They're two different things with different underlying causes and treating them as the same is not helpful.

Since Muslims are being targeted by racists of all hues the priority is to defend Muslims.
The priority is to stand in solidarity with other working class people against racism. I'd no more "defend" some biggotted nutter cleric than I would Nick fucking Griffin.

The mainstream pro-capitalist, pro-Globalisation ideas in our society are just as unscientific at root as any religion.
Nonsense. Capitalism and globilisation are rational ideologies, as long as you're ruling class.

Muslims are among the poorest and most oppressed people inm our society.
Communitarian wank.
 
Back
Top Bottom