The leadership we have, and the influence and power big industry has over them, leave us with very little. In fact arguably we're left with just enough to stop us from revolting. I think it's always been a balancing act that those criminal elements in political power, and those greedy and profit-obsessed industrialists manage on the whole to tread quite skilfully.
It helps when you have ordinary punters who scream all sorts of abuse at those who continue to ask questions of our leaders and our system, while displaying such certainty in their own views. This last bit of course is steeped in irony because that certainty they have is one of the planks of their accusations of others.
Over the last few years it has become obvious to so many more millions of people that the leaders will lie at ease. We've seen it over twat time and time again. People have come to realise this. Yet, here we are with all this information about a pandemic, and many of those same millions have reverted back to believing our leaders are working on our behalf instead of big industry.
They must be laughing all the way to the bank. Amazing what power you have if you control the media. That way you spread fear into the population, and clarity of thought is the loser. This has been proven time and time again, yet here we are with the latest global 'problem', and still people want to believe their leaders. It's almost quaint really. It is twat all over again.
Well let me try again to explain my position.
Firstly the attempt to paint everyone into 2 camps, that people either believe the government and have concrete assumptions about things, or they are wide-open truth-seekers on a pathway to expose the true horror, is false.
Belief is not an all or nothing thing, its a spectrum. There are plenty of people who are relatively open minded, who recognise many of the problems, lies and horrors that power, governments, beurocracy, systems, big business, markets, etc bring to humanity. Yet they might still decide that sometimes the government, or certain sections of it, are sometimes right or are at least trying to act in the right way to a situation that affects their population. They may be all too aware of the horrors, but they have a more balanced view about why things are done a certain way, about the motivations of those with some sort of power. Their level of cynicism towards government & business may still be high, but simply has different boundaries, different personal instinct about what the limits are to terrible acts committed by government.
Such things can also be heavily influenced by other personal beliefs, ideologies, ideas about how humans should organise themselves, etc. And sometimes its quite obvious that we coose to believe certain things because it helps us in some way, supports our current worldview or agenda or sense of self and role in the world, fighting for the good cause, whatever that cause may be.
So then there are people who decide to go further, whose suspicions about what government & friends are capable of cause them to talk in ways that end up being ridiculed by a lot of people. What draws people to such a position? The same factors as with anybody else, but the balance ends up a little different. Some may find it more convenient or enjoyable to completely demonize the enemy, to paint them as an even darker and far more lopsided phenomenon than may actually be the case. Thre is certainly enough horror and corruption in the world, its understandable that one possible reaction to it is to have an even more sinister picture of the world than may actually be the case. Other anxieties and fears and events in life, and in some cases paranoia, further shape this.
Anyway I could ramble on some more about that stuff but I'll skip to the bottom line.
What are you trying to achieve?
Focus on your beliefs about how things should be, and how to get there, more than trying to make the horror story we already live in even gorier.
Most people probably have enough reasons to dislike governments, institutions, etc, they have their own experiences and beliefs, they dont need a whole new bunch of unproven stuff thrust in their face, and I would not trust any movement that was trying to tap into 'good versus evil' emotions of the masses via highly emotive fact-free rhetoric.
If you must try to tackle the beast head on by exposing it, rather than focussing on what to do instead, then at least try to genuinely shed a light on murky areas. Speculation and lurching to worst-case evil conspiracy possibilities are no torch. Many people know to trust them even less than government, they can quite rightly make a mockery of being asked to wake up and stop believing the crap, only to be fed a bunch of even bigger crap. There are many fine examples of humans going against the flow and exposing some truth and some good coming of it. Conspiracy theorists do not seem to have fallen into this category often. Even in a world where things are covered up and bad stuff happens, pointing at shadows doesnt help. And its true that people with beliefs which are out of step with the time, contrary or dangerous, or just plain uncomfortable for people to consider, will face a hard time of it. So you have to try even harder, even if you dont think thats fair, its what you have to do if the aim is actually to make a difference, as opposed to just enjoying feeling special to be one of the awake ones preaching to the bozos. You have to be more open, accountable, credible, precise and knowledgeable than those who you attack.