as long as its within the rules i can post whatever i want whenever i want
)It's an urban myth that QWERTY was deliberately designed to make things harder.
Surely, the old QWERTY keyboard is obsolete.It was a deliberately unergonomic layout, designed to slow down common sequences on early manual typewriters, it's a pointless legacy when we're typing on unjammable machines. Time for a new mor ergonomic layout?
![]()
The literal answer to your question is that QWERTY, far from being dead, is the most commonly used text input method in the world with hundreds of millions of installations and skilled users.
Modern developments in key-based input tend to focus on "chording" (pressing several keys at once) rather than simple rearrangements of a conventional single-press keyboard.
I think so.Yeah, but you know what I meant, is it time to moove on develop a better system?I think so.
I think I may put LEDs and a spoiler on my keyboard so I can type faster.
Does RSI = repeated strain injury?![]()
I don't see any particular need for change. My typing is plenty fast enough (80 wpm+) and most people that type regularly can achieve these kinds of speeds on a good keyboard.
![]()

I don't see any particular need for change. My typing is plenty fast enough (80 wpm+) and most people that type regularly can achieve these kinds of speeds on a good keyboard.
![]()

but I would still giv a new lay-out a try, seeing as I haven't learnt speed-typing yet. So, for novices /children, a new key board lay-out in the future = might be possible?
Possible but not likely. Keyboards aren't going to change any, you'd be looking at a concept change (more than just going to touch sensitive) before that paradigm shifts.Very Flash.but I would still giv a new lay-out a try, seeing as I haven't learnt speed-typing yet. So, for novices /children, a new key board lay-out in the future = might be possible?
![]()
Very Flash.but I would still giv a new lay-out a try, seeing as I haven't learnt speed-typing yet. So, for novices /children, a new key board lay-out in the future = might be possible?
![]()
Learning a new keayboard layout would scare me.

It'd turn your love life upside down.it could potentially turn one's life upside down![]()

Speaking of keyboards, has anyone tried this optical illusion with them?
1) With your keyboard flat on your desk, grab hold of the left and right sides with your left and right hand.
2) Try to keep your eyes focussed on the g and h keys.
3) Slowly, while watching the named keys, tilt your keyboard upwards and over your head, until you are staring directly up at the keys, which should be pointing directly downwards.
4) Marvel![]()

Note where the vowels are located...Nope, is it any easier?
" keys on the middle row, and using all their fingers while typing. Note where the vowels are located...
...it means you don't have to move your hands/fingers as far around the keyboard when you type, which to my mind would be a good thing.
However, I don't use proper "touch typing" technique - I use my two index fingers, and I look at the keyboard while I type. The DVORAK redesign is predicated on a typist having four fingers of each hand hovering above the (on a QWERTY keyboard) "SDFG" and "KL" keys on the middle row, and using all their fingers while typing.
Presumably for someone like me it would be better to locate all the frequently used keys in the centre of the keyboard (on all three rows) rather than purely along the middle row (the "home keys"), as this would make them nearer to my index fingers in their resting position.
Which on is "faster" for a highly skilled touch typist is less relevant to me than:
* which one is faster for me (using two fingers)
* which one is more comfortable and ergonomic for me (less strain/better posture)
* which one produces less annoying mistakes - such as hitting the CAPSLOCK key instead of the left shift (or the windows key instead of Left Alt).





If you do any amount of typing then spending half an hour learning how to touch type is going to be worth it. You spend a half hour learning how, then every time you type afterwards you're practicing.Note where the vowels are located...
...it means you don't have to move your hands/fingers as far around the keyboard when you type, which to my mind would be a good thing.
However, I don't use proper "touch typing" technique - I use my two index fingers, and I look at the keyboard while I type. The DVORAK redesign is predicated on a typist having four fingers of each hand hovering above the (on a QWERTY keyboard) "SDFG" and "KL" keys on the middle row, and using all their fingers while typing.
Presumably for someone like me it would be better to locate all the frequently used keys in the centre of the keyboard (on all three rows) rather than purely along the middle row (the "home keys"), as this would make them nearer to my index fingers in their resting position.
Which on is "faster" for a highly skilled touch typist is less relevant to me than:
* which one is faster for me (using two fingers)
* which one is more comfortable and ergonomic for me (less strain/better posture)
* which one produces less annoying mistakes - such as hitting the CAPSLOCK key instead of the left shift (or the windows key instead of Left Alt).