Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Psycho-analysis dead?

I suppose psychoanalysis may have a value that is something akin to a placebo effect. By directing people to construct a story with which to explain themselves, it could make them feel better, even if that story is essentially arbitrary.
 
A few. Tavistock & Portman Clinic for a start.

Cassel Hospital work on psychodynamic lines as do Great Ormond Street. St Thomas' Hospital employ psychodynamic therapists. Psychodynamics is still a major school in counselling courses.
 
Not true.
Make your freekin' mind up. If the NHS employs only a few psychoanalysts, than psychoanalyis isn't practiced much in the NHS, is it? :rolleyes:

Sure, "psychodynamic therapy" uses various, eclectically chosen "psychoanalytic principles". But that doesn't mean it buys into the insane cult of Freudian psychoanalysis.
 
In the NHS psychodynamic psychotherapy is practised by psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and other professionals who have received additional specialised training in these techniques.
Look ... no mention of psychoanalysists or psychoanalysis itself.

Kind of implies psychoanalysis is not much of a career option within the NHS, no?
 
Make your freekin' mind up. If the NHS employs only a few psychoanalysts, than psychoanalyis isn't practiced much in the NHS, is it? :rolleyes:

Make my mind up what, Mr Defensive? I'm pointing out that it's used in a fair few NHS institutions. It's not used as much as CBT for sure. CBT is shorter term, cheaper to train people in, cheaper to implement etc. CBT is very useful for some things, but not so useful for others. Same as psychoanalytic psychotherapy.

Sure, "psychodynamic therapy" uses various, eclectically chosen "psychoanalytic principles". But that doesn't mean it buys into the insane cult of Freudian psychoanalysis.

The term psychodynamic is often used instead of psychoanalytic because of the almost irrational fury that psychoanalyis seems to provoke in people. Psychodynamic approaches are very much based around the work of Freud etc, working very much with the unconscious, transference, projection etc.
 
Look ... no mention of psychoanalysists or psychoanalysis itself.

Kind of implies psychoanalysis is not much of a career option within the NHS, no?

See above.

Plus the term psychoanalysis is pretty much owned by the Freud Institute. You can only call yourself a psychoanalyst if you have trained with them. Everyone else has to call themselves a psychoanalytic psychotherapist or a psychodynamic psychotherapist. All approaches work with the unconscious, transference, projection, emotional containment etc.
 
Psychoanalysis as an interpretative framework has a lot to offer contemporary debates about human hapiness and ability to cope with loss and lack.

Darian Leader's recetn critique of CBT in the Guardian is a good place to start:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/09/psychology.humanbehaviour

Strikes me that we need to discuss "what is living and what is dead" in Freudian theory, rather than simply write off the lot of it.

Yeah, a very good article - but who's gonna explain to Jonti?:rolleyes::D
 
Leader's a good writer but remember reading one of his early pieces about psychoanalysis and physics. In it he made much of how physicists were always producing graphs and other visual concepts with bulges and holes featuring in them, nudge nudge.

Turns out his dad was a physicist at CERN.
 
Jonti, sorry, I wasn't being rude in not replying I was just busy elsewhere. But I see that others have responded since.
 
Ahaaaaaaaaaa, sooooo... why not....

So, what if we use the "right kind of terminology" - say "information" - to explain psychoanalysis and human goings on to Jonti?:rolleyes::p

Say, an orgasm would be something like "information overload" [dahlink, you're making the information gnoseologically garbled, as you're ontologically naughty, sending information overload to the processor:D]...

Oedipus complex would be something like "information u-turn"... towards the ontological spring of all information [Info Ur-sprung? :D]...

Schizophrenia would be something like "randomly violent misplacing of the misperceived cross-exchange of information"...

Incest with a sibling maybe "crossing of paths of naturally parallel strings of information"...

Depression maybe "devaluation of information", with the accent on deflation of the information bearer?:p

Any help, please?
 
it's been shown to be all but useless.

useless at what? Human beings have been shown to be "all but useless" in terms of our inability cope seemlessly with the pressures of contemporary capitalism. We develop all kinds of psychic symptoms - depression, anxiety, insomnia, eating disorders, self-harm that medical science can try to suppress, but is simply suppressing (often inadequately) the limit of what we are trying to do?

If we are failing to achieve the reproduction of well-adjusted subjects, shouldn't we be asking whether there is something about the task itself that is causing us to fail.

Psychoanalysis doesn't pretend to offer easy "solutions" - it seeks to enable us to live with the difficulty of having to live with questions that eren't fully answerable - without recourse to mysticism or religiosity.
 
So, what if we use the "right kind of terminology" - say "information" - to explain psychoanalysis and human goings on to Jonti?:rolleyes::p

Say, an orgasm would be something like "information overload" [dahlink, you're making the information gnoseologically garbled, as you're ontologically naughty, sending information overload to the processor:D]...

Oedipus complex would be something like "information u-turn"... towards the ontological spring of all information [Info Ur-sprung? :D]...

Schizophrenia would be something like "randomly violent misplacing of the misperceived cross-exchange of information"...

Incest with a sibling maybe "crossing of paths of naturally parallel strings of information"...

Depression maybe "devaluation of information", with the accent on deflation of the information bearer?:p

Any help, please?
Samaritans?
 
... the term psychoanalysis is pretty much owned by the Freud Institute. You can only call yourself a psychoanalyst if you have trained with them...
And very few such are employed by the NHS; if indeed the organisation seeks to employ any at all. Pretty much makes my point, thanks. Psychoanalysis is hardly used in the UK, compared to other talking cures.

It's another question entirely to what extent the other talking cures rely on Freudian theory. Of course there are common concepts and methods, but Freudian psychoanalysis, freudian theory, is almost uniquely insane and useless.

The truth of the matter turns out to be that more depends on the character and personal skills of the therapist, than on their theoretical orientation.
 
Ooooo, Freud really nailed a few things that bother you, hasn't he....:rolleyes::D

Butch, not even them can help you....:rolleyes: Together with Freud!!!:p:D
 
And very few such are employed by the NHS; if indeed the organisation seeks to employ any at all. Pretty much makes my point, thanks. Psychoanalysis is hardly used in the UK, compared to other talking cures.

It's another question entirely to what extent the other talking cures rely on Freudian theory. Of course there are common concepts and methods, but Freudian psychoanalysis, freudian theory, is almost uniquely insane and useless.

The truth of the matter turns out to be that more depends on the character and personal skills of the therapist, than on their theoretical orientation.

You quite clearly haven't read anything I've written!
 
Says a complete... power player...:rolleyes: Butch, told ya before, you are an extraordinary hypocrite!!! :p:D
 
Someone, somewhere (and on an open source basis) should develop an Idiot's Guide to Self Psychotherapy.

I'm quite up for the prospect of some simple principles, set out in layman's language, for use in early symptoms of depression and the like. Paracetemol for the psyche.
 
as an explanation of human behaviour it has been laughable for a while cause people don't really want to kill dad and fuck mum;)h

That's not what the oedipal complex is about really. It's about the infant realising that mum and dad have a physical relationship and that the parent's affections aren't solely for them. Our daughter (1 year old tomorrow!) gets jealous when mummy and daddy have a cuddle, she tries to push me away and latches on to mummy's breasts.
 
The incest taboo is a good example of this – we are naturally averse to having sex with those we grow up with, especially if we knew each other before the age of six. There is research to back this up studying families with adopted children. It is easy to see the evolutionary advantage that this confers as those not disinclined to incest produce inferior offspring. l.

Citations for this research?


And considering that incest would 'intensify' positive traits as well as negative, it's not a given that incest will result in inferior offspring.
 
Back
Top Bottom