Blagsta
Minimum cage, maximum cage
Really. How many psychoanalysts are employed by the NHS, then?
A few. Tavistock & Portman Clinic for a start.
Really. How many psychoanalysts are employed by the NHS, then?
A few. Tavistock & Portman Clinic for a start.
In the NHS psychodynamic psychotherapy is practised by psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and other professionals who have received additional specialised training in these techniques.
Make your freekin' mind up. If the NHS employs only a few psychoanalysts, than psychoanalyis isn't practiced much in the NHS, is it?Not true.

Look ... no mention of psychoanalysists or psychoanalysis itself.In the NHS psychodynamic psychotherapy is practised by psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and other professionals who have received additional specialised training in these techniques.
Make your freekin' mind up. If the NHS employs only a few psychoanalysts, than psychoanalyis isn't practiced much in the NHS, is it?![]()
Sure, "psychodynamic therapy" uses various, eclectically chosen "psychoanalytic principles". But that doesn't mean it buys into the insane cult of Freudian psychoanalysis.
Look ... no mention of psychoanalysists or psychoanalysis itself.
Kind of implies psychoanalysis is not much of a career option within the NHS, no?
Psychoanalysis as an interpretative framework has a lot to offer contemporary debates about human hapiness and ability to cope with loss and lack.
Darian Leader's recetn critique of CBT in the Guardian is a good place to start:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/sep/09/psychology.humanbehaviour
Strikes me that we need to discuss "what is living and what is dead" in Freudian theory, rather than simply write off the lot of it.




]...
]...
it's been shown to be all but useless.
Samaritans?So, what if we use the "right kind of terminology" - say "information" - to explain psychoanalysis and human goings on to Jonti?
Say, an orgasm would be something like "information overload" [dahlink, you're making the information gnoseologically garbled, as you're ontologically naughty, sending information overload to the processor]...
Oedipus complex would be something like "information u-turn"... towards the ontological spring of all information [Info Ur-sprung?]...
Schizophrenia would be something like "randomly violent misplacing of the misperceived cross-exchange of information"...
Incest with a sibling maybe "crossing of paths of naturally parallel strings of information"...
Depression maybe "devaluation of information", with the accent on deflation of the information bearer?
Any help, please?
And very few such are employed by the NHS; if indeed the organisation seeks to employ any at all. Pretty much makes my point, thanks. Psychoanalysis is hardly used in the UK, compared to other talking cures.... the term psychoanalysis is pretty much owned by the Freud Institute. You can only call yourself a psychoanalyst if you have trained with them...
And very few such are employed by the NHS; if indeed the organisation seeks to employ any at all. Pretty much makes my point, thanks. Psychoanalysis is hardly used in the UK, compared to other talking cures.
It's another question entirely to what extent the other talking cures rely on Freudian theory. Of course there are common concepts and methods, but Freudian psychoanalysis, freudian theory, is almost uniquely insane and useless.
The truth of the matter turns out to be that more depends on the character and personal skills of the therapist, than on their theoretical orientation.
What a deliciously simple way of putting it.A vulgar display of social power is not offset by a smiley![]()
Oh, look, it's the amateurs again...![]()
as an explanation of human behaviour it has been laughable for a while cause people don't really want to kill dad and fuck mumh
as an explanation of human behaviour it has been laughable for a while cause people don't really want to kill dad and fuck mumh
It's beyond you, 8, so never mind...![]()
The incest taboo is a good example of this – we are naturally averse to having sex with those we grow up with, especially if we knew each other before the age of six. There is research to back this up studying families with adopted children. It is easy to see the evolutionary advantage that this confers as those not disinclined to incest produce inferior offspring. l.
SLAM NHS trust are using it
http://www.psychotherapy.slam.nhs.uk/Default.aspx?tabid=520

