Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Max Mosley a naughty boy then?

Dj TAB

Mr Whippy
Well apologies for the lame thread title but this news story has raised a question or two... Perhaps the great folk of urban might like to comment!

Original Story Here

Firstly I guess the man is entitled to a "private" sex life, although one could be forgiven for dismissing this on the grounds that he was visiting a Chelsea dungeon as well as paying £2500 for the privilege... I also doubt very much his poor wife had his appointment pencilled in her diary just in case she wondered why his phone was off...:eek: (sorry love, can't talk now, I'm being whipped 'til I bleed! :D)

Following his five-hour, Nazi-styled session many seem upset at the theme to the extent that they are making assumptions concerning his beliefs, and those of his rather repellent (& dead) father...

So bearing all this in mind.....

1. Is this newsworthy, and should it be in the public domain?
2. Is the use of real historical events in BDSM or fetish scenes acceptable?
3. Is it right that these events have raised comparisons between him and his father?
4. Are all who are active or interested in BDSM or related activities to be labelled "sado-masochist sex perverts?"
5. Max is now citing an invasion of privacy, do you agree with this?

As somebody who is active in aspects of BDSM I was disturbed by the tone of the reporting - I do appreciate however that The News of the World is not the pinnacle of journalism!

Over to you Urban, what do you think?
 
1. Is this newsworthy, yes and should it be in the public domain? probably not, but you can see why they'd print it, considering.
2. Is the use of real historical events in BDSM or fetish scenes acceptable? of course. pretty much anything is acceptable, as long as no-one's permanently damaged
3. Is it right that these events have raised comparisons between him and his father? no. although it is inevitable, i suppose.
4. Are all who are active or interested in BDSM or related activities to be labelled "sado-masochist sex perverts?" in the news of the world, yes. should they be? no.
5. Max is now citing an invasion of privacy, do you agree with this? yeah, i think so. he's not spending public funds on his nazi sex sessions, so he can do what he wants afaic.

at the same time, i've little sympathy for the multi-millionaire son of a nazi. you can be sure some of his doubloons are somewhat stained...
 
1. Is this newsworthy, and should it be in the public domain?
2. Is the use of real historical events in BDSM or fetish scenes acceptable?
3. Is it right that these events have raised comparisons between him and his father?
4. Are all who are active or interested in BDSM or related activities to be labelled "sado-masochist sex perverts?"
5. Max is now citing an invasion of privacy, do you agree with this?

1. Only if it appears his descsions regarding the financal penilties of certain F1 teams after not penailising their rivials who had started and admitted previously to spying were made in this fashion... in which case yes it's important as say any other sproting event...
2. Fantasy is just that. Nothing more.
3. If indeed it was nazi themed then there could be with in context a number of situations where he was being abused by the nazi's and was in fact a victim of them. If on some level his first sexual exerpinces were being recreated by this then it wouldn't conclude anything more significant...

previously it has been mentioned on here and other places that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree although butchers and others have leapt in previously to defend him from comparisions to his father, and they are / were more active antifa so it could be nonsense... personally i'm a beliver in the former attitude...
4. Of course they are perverted the concept of modern legitimate and illigitimate sex was on forged in the heart of queen vikkis reign these haven't changed signifcantly other than to allow homosexuals to have sex at the hetro age of consent...

something which this type of paper would have had a field day with only a few years ago called it disgusting sexual peversion these homosexuals were involved with...
5. No he's the big man caught out who often morallises about what is and isn't acceptable and he's going to be hung for it...

Max is however notoriously litigeous as is bernie... so not suprised.....
 
It sounds like a rather disturbing fantasy, but fair play to him for 'switching' at least. ;) But consenting adults and all that, if that's his thing, that's his thing. His heritage doesn't help. I don't believe for a minute it makes him a Nazi politically, but I can see if he was kinkily inclined it might form the basis for a fetish. I don't see any cause for crying 'public interest' in this story myself on the moral front, but clearly on the sales front is another matter.

I'm not that happy when I see people at fetish nights in Nazi regalia, but I'm not bothered enough to make a fuss about it, either.
 
Lets face it, no one has ever fantasised about being tied up and ravished by a liberal.

....

image.php


:o
 
This is more gossip than news, and it's none of my business what Mosley gets up to behind closed doors. Although having seen it, I will admit to chortling over it a bit. It sounds like a pornographic spoof of 'Allo 'Allo.

Lets face it, no one has ever fantasised about being tied up and ravished by a liberal.

:D
 
The only thing that I was surprised about was finding out that he was the sone of Oswald Mosely. Other than that I couldn't give a damn.
 
His Jew-hating father—who had Hitler as guest of honour at his marriage—would have been proud of his warped son's command of German as he struts around looking for bottoms to whack.

But even the vile Thirties fascist—whose blackshirt thugs terrorised London's East End—might have been less impressed with the sordid company his offspring keeps.

The idea that a fascist and friend of Hitler might have the right to look down on sex workers.... The News of the World never fail to impress, do they. :rolleyes:
 
... though on the main theme: generally, yes, I'd go with the consenting adults, privacy.

But... when that runs up against a millionaire, extremely powerful, (ex?) fascist - and particularly one who gets his kicks from something he should be keeping very, very clear of, given his family background... well fuck him. I mean, former British Union of Fascists candidate - son of Oswald Mosely - pays for deathcamp sex fantasies - fucking hell, all bets are off..

What if some future descendent of the 9/11 bombers was discovered playing out sexy pilot training fantasies? :eek: :eek:
 
Journalist seems to be getting quite carried away with the detail!

Red-faced and panting, Mosley looks on like a child in a sweet shop, but surrounded by bright red bottoms.

:D

I dunno, one part of me thinks consenting adults, another thinks well, it is a newsworthy story with the family history. But I think the newspaper article goes far too over the top with the ins and outs (wehey!) of the 5 hours which shows its main aim is to titillate.
 
.

What if some future descendent of the 9/11 bombers was discovered playing out sexy pilot training fantasies? :eek: :eek:

well there are not going to be any are they :D.
Funny but irrelevant nazi regalia/bdsm are made for each other are'nt they .
Dodgy bloke maybe but hardly going to have any influence now is he .
 
1. Is this newsworthy, and should it be in the public domain?
2. Is the use of real historical events in BDSM or fetish scenes acceptable?
3. Is it right that these events have raised comparisons between him and his father?
4. Are all who are active or interested in BDSM or related activities to be labelled "sado-masochist sex perverts?"
5. Max is now citing an invasion of privacy, do you agree with this?

1. NoTW should show pics or STFU.
2. Whatever floats your boat, if you're not hurting anyone (without consent at least ;) ).
3. His father was a essentially a hitler wannabe, it is impossible to avoid the comparison.
4. Absolutely not, in fact I think you ought to write them a bloody strongly worded letter. :D
5. Technically yes, but do sado-masochist sex perverts even understand privacy like right minded wholesome people such as myself? ;):D
 
5 hookers x 5 hours x BDSM fantasy roleplay shenanigans = £2500?

I think I know how this got to the paps. Something that hasn't been considered yet: would it be distasteful to carry out your concentration camp sexual fantasies with a jewish hooker?
 
She probably gets to charge more for being authentic :o:D.
I'm sorry .


Can anyone find this other than funny son of nazi caught in nazi sex orgy .
 
NotW have had to withdraw the pictures and video as they are now being pursued for invasion of privacy....

It's also been decided that it would be innappropriate for him to show up at the next grand-prix as various Royals are meant to be there....
 
1. Is this newsworthy, and should it be in the public domain?

No, and no. What consenting adults do behind closed doors is a matter for them and is none of our business. The only exception I might make is if it was part of some sort of corruption (eg politician being bribed with prostitutes in return for favours).

2. Is the use of real historical events in BDSM or fetish scenes acceptable?

It shows supremely poor taste, but again no-one's been involved in anything to which they haven't consented.

3. Is it right that these events have raised comparisons between him and his father?

I don't know if his political views are extreme right-wing or not. Since there is no evidence that he is abusing his position in the motor racing world or using his money to finance extremism, does it really matter?

4. Are all who are active or interested in BDSM or related activities to be labelled "sado-masochist sex perverts?"

Certainly not. It's not my thing at all but I repeat what should be rule #1 of human existence - consenting adults of full capacity have the right to decide what they wish to do with their bodies.

5. Max is now citing an invasion of privacy, do you agree with this?

Yes. I can't see any conceivable public interest in the reporting of this story.
 
NotW have had to withdraw the pictures and video as they are now being pursued for invasion of privacy....

I can't see why. There is no right of action for invasion of privacy in English law. There is an action for breach of confidence, but I can't see why this case wouldn't be covered by the Jamie Theakston case or the case of that Blackburn Rovers defender whose name escapes me .... if you engage in sex outside marriage or with hookers, they have the right to tell others about it. We get the media we deserve.
 
It's also been decided that it would be innappropriate for him to show up at the next grand-prix as various Royals are meant to be there....

Which is odd, when you think about the dubious kinky group sex antics certain members of the royal family have allegedly indulged in...
 
Back
Top Bottom