Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is Labour re-electable with Gordon at the helm?

As thread title


  • Total voters
    53
If Blair had stayed put he could have sacrificed Chancellor Brown for the credit crunch and made Dave look like the out of touch Etonian he is at heart, rather looking like the only PM in waiting.

Even if that were true which I don't think it would there is no way Blair could have held on until this election.
 
Major in 1992 still had the core Tory vote who were loyal to the Party even if they didn't like him. Anti-Tories thought he's lose anyway and so didn't vote hence in 1997 them made damn sure he was out on his ear.

A week may be a long time in politics, as might 3 months until November of till next year but Brown will still lose - the question is how far he will fall and what will be left of the LP to be picked over.
 
Even if that were true which I don't think it would there is no way Blair could have held on until this election.

I think that's right, but I thought that after the invasion, and was very, very wrong then. Without the glittering prize of Pres of Europe he might well have stayed.
 
as far as I can see, Cams pissing off normal Tories by being all lib-dem and not evil enough.

This is what I mean about the conference. If there are substantial rumblings from the honest-we're-evil tories about their true intentions (slash and burn everything), or if the European wound starts to supperate, it won't be an easy call.

A huge amount will rely on the economy as well - if we're out of recession, and NL can build a narrative around the concept of 'Intervention worked, look at XXXX' it could be an interesting election.

But like I said, ask me in March next year.
 
The Prime Minister doesn't technicall need to be in either house - and anyway Mandleson will soon be able to renounce his life peerage with the new bill going through. There is an arguement that no-one in government should also be in Parliament so as to remove the payrole vote - instead they would appear a the bar of the couse and be cross examined by the House and so separate the powers of the executive from the legislature.
 
afaik, the last Lord to be PM resigned his peerage before taking the PM seat.

Not specifically banned like.

Yeah - it's just due to tradition[/url] and the fact that most people wouldn't want a PM ruling from the Lords. I was going to say 'wouldn't want an unelected Prime Minister,' but we've had a few of those - though I guess they were at least elected in their constituencies.
 
This is what I mean about the conference. If there are substantial rumblings from the honest-we're-evil tories about their true intentions (slash and burn everything), or if the European wound starts to supperate, it won't be an easy call.

A huge amount will rely on the economy as well - if we're out of recession, and NL can build a narrative around the concept of 'Intervention worked, look at XXXX' it could be an interesting election.

But like I said, ask me in March next year.

ah, yeah. I hadn't considered the issue that rives the tories. It will remain to be seen wether they choose solidarity and decide to stick together in pursuit of power, or rip each other apart over this issue.
 
The Tories still aren't properly rid of Thatcher. While there's still a strong Thatcherite contingent in the party, at both lower and higher echelons (i.e. local constituency to Tebbit), and a strong Little England grouping even if they got into power there's no guaranteeing that they'd stick together for more than 1 term.
 
I don't think Europe will be that much of a problem for Cameron. Labour will of course do their damnest to divide the party on these lines but Cameron doesn't really face that much dissent among party ranks...yet. His pro-trade anti-federalist stance is what most Tory voters agree on anyway.
 
No and they would be even less re-electable if they went bonkers and brought someone else in.

Tories are a cert. :(

not if they let loose people like that arsehole with him NHS comments, i guess it depends on how well they can get their MPs to keep quiet.

They are the enemies of every decent person and will make even New Labour look like Saint Bob Geldof!!
 
A week may be a long time in politics
Reminds me of the old classic.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Margaret.
Margaret who?
A week's a long time in politics.

Labout ain't got a snowball's chance in hell. I do agree that Tone might have brought 'em home a fourth term, but only by a slender margin. Voters are wary of change, and they like governments who appear strong.
 
I'll bet anyone a tenner that if the tories win next year and slash and burn their way through the country as they did in the 1980s, within 5 yrs you will all wish you had kept lovely, incompetent, dull, Gordon !:rolleyes:

" Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it"!!!!:eek:
 
I'll bet anyone a tenner that if the tories win next year and slash and burn their way through the country as they did in the 1980s, within 5 yrs you will all wish you had kept lovely, incompetent, dull, Gordon !:rolleyes:

" Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it"!!!!:eek:

That long? This board'll be howling within 6 months.
 
Personally I think Gordon is not doing too badly.

He has an awful TV persona and could really do with help on it. He smiles insincerely and gulps air in a most odd manner. Margaret Thatcher changed her voice in order to come across better, I think Gordon Brown if he is serious about being and remaining prime minister should do some equally cutting self analysis.

He is serious, not a lightweight, commands some respect in the world and imho does not do too badly at PMQs.

Cameron by comparison is the ex PR old Etonian who has a baby face and I rate lower than Haigue. Cameron may not win it but Brown could lose it if he does not come across better.

People said the same things about Major. Face to face he is charming and has a great sense of humour, they said that about Major and they are saying it about Brown.
 
Cameron by comparison is the ex PR old Etonian who has a baby face and I rate lower than Haigue.

Me too. I don't like the mans politics but he's got far more to him than Cameron or any of the other tory nonentities. He got the timing of his first leadership bid hopelessly wrong, should have waited for Blair to start looking tired, so he's biding his time now.
 
Let's go for Mandy. This country is crying out for a gay leader.

They would love to attack the fact he is gay but would also have to restrain themself.i think the best brown can hope for is an hung parliament but its not going to happen
 
I'll bet anyone a tenner that if the tories win next year and slash and burn their way through the country as they did in the 1980s, within 5 yrs you will all wish you had kept lovely, incompetent, dull, Gordon !:rolleyes:

" Be careful what you ask for, you just might get it"!!!!:eek:

Very few people on here are 'asking for' a Tory government.
 
I don't think the fear of a tory government is as strong as it was but i feel the tories will be unpopular very quickly.i and many more people will not be voteing for a government we want rather voteing against a government we don't want:(
 
Back
Top Bottom