Brockway said:I read the text he said "The French".
don't be disingenuous. this what he said:
French political classes and military heirarchy (personified in Petain).
Brockway said:I read the text he said "The French".
French political classes and military heirarchy (personified in Petain).
guinnessdrinker said:read the text, he is talking about the political establishment and the military hierarchy (apart from De Gaulle, famously), not your ordinary Johnny Frenchman.
), and he's sticking to it, however much of a goon he makes himself look.
ViolentPanda said:If you are, then you'll know that your analogy of "soldiers outside the house threatening..." is absolute gash, and that serious aggravation between Vichy and Germany only took place around '44 when Hitler "lost the plot big-time" on his western and eastern fronts.
Oh come on. If there was a bunch of soldiers outside your house threatening to shoot your dad and rape your sister and they offered to spare them if you colluded what would you do? There's a basic human instinct for self-preservation when faced with death. France was occupied we weren't - don't be so smug.
ViolentPanda said:You're either disingenuous or a village is missing it's idiot.
If you're going to do cheap insults do try and make them original or at least amusing.
By France I mean (and it appears to be plainly obvious to everyone except you) the France that is an idea of an "ideal type" in people's heads, the mythic France that the country's establishment attempts to instil in the imagination of the peoples of France.
Now you are retrospectively changing what you said. What you actually said was this: "The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture." Oh and when did you develop the magic power to see inside people's heads?
Oh, and I'd rather generalise (smugly or not) than attempt to construct a premise around individual cases.
I wouldn't - I'd rather show you the individual case that blows your generalisation out of the water. I suspect there are millions of these "individual cases".
Language changes, it evolves, it is fluid. If you have interchange and intersection between cultures you get hybridisation or what purists might term "contamination". It's a fact of life, what I or anyone else might want is immaterial in the face of that fact.
I haven't said that it isn't fluid or that it doesn't evolve. All I'm saying is that wanting to preserve it doesn't make anyone a Fascist. You'd get plenty of Brits wanting to preserve English if they felt it was being usurped by a non-anglo language. Or do you honestly think there wouldn't be any fuss and people wouldn't be getting all dewy eyed about the language of Keats and Wordsworth etc? People get upset about what they perceive to be the debasing of language in texting.
We don't speak the same language as "the Americans", we speak a similar but separate language, but "American-English" has been going it's own way (and evolving and borrowing) for 200 years or so now, with exposure to some influences that "Standard English" as spoken and written in the UK hasn't come across.
![]()
ViolentPanda said:Are you aware of how long the negotiations over surrender and occupation took, the terms of the negotiations, the terms finally agreed on or the broad concessions gained by the Vichy state?
If you are, then you'll know that your analogy of "soldiers outside the house threatening..." is absolute gash, and that serious aggravation between Vichy and Germany only took place around '44 when Hitler "lost the plot big-time" on his western and eastern fronts.
guinnessdrinker said:don't be disingenuous. this what he said:
ViolentPanda said:Are you aware of how long the negotiations over surrender and occupation took, the terms of the negotiations, the terms finally agreed on or the broad concessions gained by the Vichy state?
If you are, then you'll know that your analogy of "soldiers outside the house threatening..." is absolute gash, and that serious aggravation between Vichy and Germany only took place around '44 when Hitler "lost the plot big-time" on his western and eastern fronts.
ViolentPanda said:Conversely, perhaps Brockway actually knows what I mean better than I do.
Nah.
He's come up with his own spurious reading (which appears to be outwith the context of the thread, naturally), and he's sticking to it, however much of a goon he makes himself look.
Fine by me, and probably fine by Juliette Greco too.![]()

kyser_soze said:Many in France do have that obsession.
Brockway said:I'm not being disingenuous. This is what he said: "The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture"
Brockway said:How many?
Brockway said:Well maybe they thought rather than allow their people to get slaughtered; their lovely buildings get bombed to fuck, they'd go along with it for the time being. I wouldn't regard Vichy as a wholesale endorsement of Nazism.
Brockway said:
guinnessdrinker said:indeed. have you ever heard of Maurice Papon, brockway?
guinnessdrinker said:you want precise numbers?

guinnessdrinker said:only many did more than their fair share of collaboration with the enemy. many were shot as the war unfolded and after that as well. many others were pardoned and went on to become influential figures in the French state.
guinnessdrinker said:so you haven't got an answer, have you?
guinnessdrinker said:Brockway, will you reply to this question?

ViolentPanda said:The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture, and that means white, Catholic culture, whether that culture is peasant, bourgeois or aristocratic.
QUOTE]
There you go. Tell me that's not a massive anti-French generalisation.
Brockway said:
"Anti-French". That's good. If only you knew how good.Brockway said:to what exactly? I have been referring to VioletPanda's glib anti-French generalisation that "The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture".

Brockway said:ViolentPanda said:The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture, and that means white, Catholic culture, whether that culture is peasant, bourgeois or aristocratic.
QUOTE]
There you go. Tell me that's not a massive anti-French generalisation.
Brockway, I've met some really pro-French socialists in my time, and even they tell me: "er, I have to be honest, but France is a racist country. There's no two ways about it, the French, by and large, are very, very anti-black people."
That isn't a direct quote, but is a similar response I have received many times on the subject.
I feel it is widely acknowledged by people who have visited France on numerous occassions, that the country is actually quite intolerant of non-whites.
Brockway said:ViolentPanda said:The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture, and that means white, Catholic culture, whether that culture is peasant, bourgeois or aristocratic.
QUOTE]
There you go. Tell me that's not a massive anti-French generalisation.
You're still having trouble posting quotes, I see.
What I'd like you to do is to actually prove (without your sad attempts referencing a handful of individuals) that I'm wrong, because all I've got from you so far is a load of old fanny that comprises 95% sneering and 5% substance, and the 5% substance isn't exactly informative.
Pete the Greek said:Brockway said:Brockway, I've met some really pro-French socialists in my time, and even they tell me: "er, I have to be honest, but France is a racist country. There's no two ways about it, the French, by and large, are very, very anti-black people."
That isn't a direct quote, but is a similar response I have received many times on the subject.
I feel it is widely acknowledged by people who have visited France on numerous occassions, that the country is actually quite intolerant of non-whites.
I'm not saying that there aren't French racists Pete - I'm sure there are plenty. But the idea that British people are less so seems ridiculous to me. I once saw my ex-boss wipe a chair with a handkerchief after a black man had sat in it. I was on the DLR once going through Shadwell and there was a lovely smell of Asian food wafting into the train and this woman was telling her kid that they (asians) weren't clean people. I bet neither of those people voted for the BNP.
ViolentPanda said:Brockway said:You're still having trouble posting quotes, I see.
What I'd like you to do is to actually prove (without your sad attempts referencing a handful of individuals) that I'm wrong, because all I've got from you so far is a load of old fanny that comprises 95% sneering and 5% substance, and the 5% substance isn't exactly informative.
I'm not having trouble posting quotes. Look, here's one of an anti-French generalisation you made earlier:
"The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture".
![]()
![]()
![]()
ViolentPanda said:IMO that's accurate.
The French have an obsession with retaining some kind of mythical "purity" within their culture, and that means white, Catholic culture, whether that culture is peasant, bourgeois or aristocratic.
Islam is an excuse, and peddled by a former torturer of Muslims such as le Pen, it has even less credibility than it might otherwise retain, because the man has a hard-on for non-whites.
Actually, If Royal did get it, maybe she'd get it off with toyboy Cameron. Now thet WOULD change Euro politiques.