Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Is an Anarchist Society Possible?

Contemporary working class people understand that exploitation and injustice are essentially contestable concepts, philosophically speaking. They are also sophisticated beyond the bourgeois analysis of society as a set of problems on some shopping list of sundry 'isms. This leaves only poverty as a potential candidate problem. Perhaps it's the "Poverty of student life".

http://library.nothingness.org/articles/SI/en/display/4

In order to be at one with the Static Cosmos, one must achieve a state of supreme stillness.
This state is known as Apathy.
The word APATHY derives from the Atlantean. A-PATH-Y.
A meaning A. PATH meaning PATH. And Y being an abbreviation of WHY.
Quite literally A PATH TO THE MEANING WHY.

Hugo Rune, The Book of Ultimate Truths
 
no that's wrong. How can an inanimate object, be in control, when " men make history"?

As the anarchists lecture everybody, you need to read.;) capital. Or perhaps you could go here, and follow the link to the capital lectures.
www.ResistanceMP3.org.uk

I tried to read capital once but it's like 1000 pages long so I got a few pages in and thought fuck this. :p

Can you please stop spamming me with links to your own site? Every time I ask a question you you do that.
 
I tried to read capital once but it's like 1000 pages long so I got a few pages in and thought fuck this. :p

Can you please stop spamming me with links to your own site? Every time I ask a question you you do that.

You're right. It is hard. I read it as part of a reading group. That's why many people are turning to the video lectures, i suggested.

Don't want people to make suggestions, dont make wrong remarks. www.ResistanceMP3.org.uk :p
 
Can disprove a positive then? i.e God exists.
Technically he's correct. But I don't bother saying "there's no evidence there's unicorns, fairies, goblins, a teapot orbiting the Sun, a Creator God" etc. The chances that they exist are so vanishingly small, I'm afraid I have the affrontery to assume they don't exist.
 
But I've got a teapot in my hand right now!
And I suppose you want me to say that your beliefs are harmless as long as it gives you comfort? Well what if there's a drought and people say "It's OK, we'll bring the teapots out of orbit, and slake the thirsts of the multitudes?" Hmm. Hmmm?
 
And I suppose you want me to say that your beliefs are harmless as long as it gives you comfort? Well what if there's a drought and people say "It's OK, we'll bring the teapots out of orbit, and slake the thirsts of the multitudes?" Hmm. Hmmm?
But they'd still be in orbit if you wanted to use them to quench people's thirsts during a drought...
 

Can disprove a positive then? i.e God exists.

Technically he's correct. But I don't bother saying "there's no evidence there's unicorns, fairies, goblins, a teapot orbiting the Sun, a Creator God" etc. The chances that they exist are so vanishingly small, I'm afraid I have the affrontery to assume they don't exist.

Well there are millions of teapots orbiting the Sun, that's a fact!

See, I think it's up to Believers to prove their assertions. Otherwise I'll just assume there's No Such Thing.

But I've got a teapot in my hand right now!

And I suppose you want me to say that your beliefs are harmless as long as it gives you comfort? Well what if there's a drought and people say "It's OK, we'll bring the teapots out of orbit, and slake the thirsts of the multitudes?" Hmm. Hmmm?

But they'd still be in orbit if you wanted to use them to quench people's thirsts during a drought...
Fucking hell, I was just being pedantic, for a wind up.:D
 
Back
Top Bottom