Number one: there have not been 100,000 deaths in this war. No one claims that. Number two: Yes, it is different. You are comparing the deliberate beheading of a bound civilian with something else entirely. You disgrace yourself by pretending not to appreciate this profound difference.Barking_Mad said:
Iraq on brink of Civil War?
- Thread starter Groucho
- Start date
rogue yam said:
I you are US citizen yourself then it is already obvious to me - from the little amount I read of your postings - that your ignorance and hatred is indeed caused by the USA.
Yet for the enslavement of your brain to the USA brainwashing you must take full responsibility yourself.
salaam.
Your insane blather is not at all remarkable. The only thing of interest about you is how you are seemingly accepted by socialistic infidels who you would likely, in other circumstances, be happy to see beheaded. I understand you. They, on the other hand, are still a bit of a mystery. But that's my problem, not yours.Aldebaran said:
rogue yam said:
The figure propably is a lot higher indeed.
No one claims anything since the US didn't find it a point of interest to count "collateral damage" as the disposable, since not US Made, Iraqi civilians that were murdered by the USA are called.
There is indeed a substantial difference between full scale illegal criminal invasion of a sovereign nation, performing "shock and awe" terrorism on its civilians, occupying the nation, flatten its towns, massacre tens of thousands of its completely innocent civilians, torturing upto death a few, shooting unarmed wounded men, murder a wounded teenager and call it "mercy killing" (yes, we "mercy kill" our animals too) etc... etc... and a few civilians of that nation taking revenge for all this (and an amount of other "neglectable things") with as their target one single, possibly also innocent, person.
salaam.
spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
rogue yam said:
You understood Aldebaran's post?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
rather a non sequitur when replying to my question "Why the need to highlight the fact that Pearl was a Jew, and that his Killer was Muslim?, don't you think?rogue yam said:
Nothing to do with your inability to deal with any substantive point with anything but abuse, I don't suppose?
The issue is why you felt the need to highlight the fact, not why Pearl's killers did. Are you really that anile that you can't comprehend clearly written English?
I've blamed nothing on nobody, you tediously cretinous waste of your creator's energy.
Still, carry on with your laughably childish tantrum of insult-hurling, it says FAR more about you and your deficiencies than it says about me.
tangentlama
Nameless voices crying
adhominyam is loosing the argument, again
kindly desist, yammie.
you're contributions are turning into a bit of a joke
kindly desist, yammie.
you're contributions are turning into a bit of a joke
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Belushi said:ROFLMAO
Ridiculous, isn't he?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
rogue yam said:
Perhaps he was mimicking the majority of your "contributions" on this board?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Aldebaran said:
I prefer to label them "nationalist-Zionists" myself.
tangentlama
Nameless voices crying
Aldebaran said:
you forgot to mention the well publicised US Military 'revenge' mission on an entire city as collective punishment for the actions of a few
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Belushi said:
He's very heavy on judgement, this lad.
Tis a pity he's also very light on facts.
You lie about everything, of course. There is exactly one religion on Earth today whose adherents publicly torture and murder innocents, and that is your religion: Islam. All of your lies and distractions are as nothing compared to this simple fact. To you, Daniel Pearl was "possibly also innocent". To everyone else on this board, even the most psychotic, lying leftie of them all, Danny was simply a working person doing his job. I know that you don't care. Infidels are infidels to you. What I wonder about is the leftie retards on this board who embrace your murderous lies. What the fuck are they thinking?Aldebaran said:
rogue yam said:
I didn't even use my single functioning brain cell to write all that. You may wonder what would happen if I would.
That is of course why I am here. I want to lure them right into my basements and secret caves. Not even a sword needed to kill them there. Nobody ever came out alive. A whole Hollywood crew trying to make a movie title The Noble Mad Arab included.
Doesn't that make you even more a lunatic then I am?
It must be a big problem not to know that anyone who posts anonymously on a message board can't be anything else but a complete mystery.
salaam.
Barking_Mad
Non sibi sed omnibus
rogue yam said:
Sorry, you clearly have been watching too much Faux News if you dont think anyone has claimed 100,000 dead. You can go Google it yourself and that report was over a year ago now. However, to avoid an argument, lets call it 50,000 dead. YOU, that's right, YOU supported a war thats killed 50,000 poeple - not to mention has failed to do any of the objectives you said it would.
Listen, Im not the one trying to square the circle here. I wont defend anyone chopping anyone's head off - ITS WRONG FULL STOP! But this isn't my problem because YOU are the one trying to make 1 death = 50,000. You're the disgrace, you're the disengenous liar who tries to rationalise away the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people.
See, you have absolutely no basic grounds for right and wrong, you just define right and wrong as you see fit, as it suits your argument - that way you never have to come to terms with how evil the actions are that you allow to be committed in your name.
tangentlama
Nameless voices crying
countdown ...
he said 'infidel' PML
rogue yam said:
he said 'infidel' PML
tangentlama
Nameless voices crying
Fuchs66 said:Bloody hell you must have been to a different Iraq to the one I was in or are you merely passing on (after a bit of embellishment) stuff you've read in the papers? I wonder.......
you missed the Lancet report, then?
Crispy
The following psytrance is baṉned: All
rogue yam said:
*drools vacantly into space*
No, I can think for myself. Here's what I think:
The Bush administration waded into a region it knew little about, with the aim of forcing its values on other people. It thought that Democracy has one ingredient - elections - and that democracy is the natural ground-state of human society that it will naturally return to when a dictator is removed.
In actual fact, they have only succeeded in stirring up a hornet's nest of fucking trouble (whose roots are deep in religious division and previous colonial adventures) - as predicted by pretty much everybody here way back before the war.
You are utterly retarded. The Lancet report was and is garbage. Even the initial reportage from the benighted BBC (which you linked) distanced itself from the Lancet's crap. Subsequent analysis of the Lancet bosh was universally condemning. You lie about this why? Stupidity? Ignorance? What?tangentlama said:
Fuchs66
Ring a ding
tangentlama said:
No I read the Lancet report, did you? Very hard to confirm exact figures, and this report fails to convince. It's just my experiences on the whole dont match up with the vast majority of what is talked about here by people with even less firstand experience than me.
I know of one battle however where up to 20000 civilians were killed mainly by the invading forces and of which posters here have been on the whole supportive.
D-Day
Similar threads
