FridgeMagnet said:Nah, don't like the look of that at all. The buttons are crap and it looks like a shiny soap (though the embedded screen seems quite nice). It's not up to Sony's usual standards.

thomy78 said:yeah the old sonys where a pain, this one has agot a new search function aparently, you can even do a year search, something you cant do on a n ipod...i think
thomy78 said:the ipod although a good design not exatly adventourus

thomy78 said:lol...a little harsh feel, anyway i loved fisher price stufff.....
trannau would you preffer it in white and blue????
i think its cool, it looks completely different to the ipod, and had to really otherwise it was going to get the 'its a copy' brigade on its back.
the ipod although a good design not exatly adventourus
I'm not seeing your point. They're both everyday computer interfaces that aren't particularly alike to my eyes. They could be any one of a hundred programs.Kid_Eternity said:Sony really is looking more and more desperate with every release...
Sony audio software:
Apple audio software:
editor said:The Nanos look great, but anyone jogging around with one of these ridiculous things on their arm deserves a well-earned slap:
![]()

Bob_the_lost said:A much underused phrase imo.![]()


tarannau said:The original Walkman from Sony succeeded because they were simple, intuitive and iconic, with the ipod achieving much the same status in the market now. These new Sony efforts are muddled and dated looking in comparison - hotch potches that are neither fish nor shiny foul.
...
Is Sony getting a little desperate after too many fuck-ups of late?
editor said:But judging by those two screen grabs, I'd say that the Sony looks a bit better.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp3#Licensing_and_patent_issuesthe B said:Why someone wants ogg support is beyond me. Seriously... I've tried to download oggs but you just don't find them like you do mp3s...
As for radio - primmie
More interested in ease of us above anything - which means the software and the hardware... all the inbetween bits.
Anyway, I like the nano - but am happy with my current Mini. I expect the nano will progress in the future and then I'll move that way.

Xanadu said:The sound quality of OGG is a fair bit better than MP3 at 128kbps. I've got quite a bit of music in OGG format. Far more than I have in AAC.