Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

IOF plan Negev ethnic cleansing

Dandred: I do not know anything about you so I am at a loss to try and offer armchair analysis but to some of us other people in the world, our lands mean alot to us...even to the point of dying for them. I did work in America, made a decent nest egg but that is all I would ever wwant from that moral vacuum. My wife feels the same exact way.

You find it humorous when I describe Israel as "my land." Yet I do not see you offering any facts to refute this.


As for Native Americans, I am sure now that you have a problem with reading comprehension. I have said MANY times that Native Americans need and should get their rightful share in American largesse. Before the first European stepped ashore, the Natives had been here since time immemorial.


"13 Bedua girl shot ALLEGEDLY by IDF." IF she had in fact been shot while wandering onto a firing range whose signs are posted in Hebrew, Arabic, English, and now quite often in russian, who should be blamed? The IDF for posting dire warnings on land which it owns? I do not have any idea what you hope to gain by your question. All uninvolved people getting hurt is an extrem tragedy but this is what happens when people do not pay attention.

If a soldier DELIBERATELY shot her he should be executed although our code does not call for it.


Why would you call it ethnic cleansing? Plenty of herding permits ARE issued, farfrom live fire parade grounds. Israel has Arab statesmen, Arab soldiers, does not sound as if Arabs are being made to want to leave. Arabs, like any other Israeli, are completely free to leave our nation whenever they choose. They CHOOSE to be Israeli. Does that not answer your inane question?


Tangent: "Demographists are planning on removing [sic] another 500,000 charedim from the USA." Noone can "remove" anyone. People have to wish to emigrate and then apply to do so. While we have plenty of room for a half million from anywhere I am not sure you are realistically considering what you are saying.

Up to the present we are compelled to use "Guest Workers" because of a severe shortage in our labor pool. Even if half a million highly religious Jews came home , it is exceedingly unlikely that they would aim for manual labor. When they move, from America anyway, there are groups like "Nefesh B'Nefesh" [Soul to Soul] that helps them plan everything down to the tiniest detail, most definitely finances.

By moving to Negev, they would not be subject to any special financial incentives and it would not make much sense at all. In other words. They would have to be very solvent to make a move to Negev. If one was sufficiently solvent, why would one then opt for menial factory labor? It just makes no sense at all.


"Helping Jews escape anti Jewishness is only a front for these barons of industry who seek to reshape the face of the region." Sorry, there is no truth to that...at all.


"Cannot write Hebrew here anymore..." I never knew that we could? It would make things so much easier on this end.


Aldebaran: I am a college educated man. I was edcuated in Israel. I assure you that I have read my share of works dating from the Biblical period up until the present. If you care to name a book or two, chances are I have already read it. I just recommended Kinross' book on the Ottomans to another poster and am rereading, as always, Kimmerling and Migdal's "The Palestinian People," I would not imagine that you would have a problem with either but one never knows.

Instead oif making mad assumptions on people's education, the logical thing would be to actually make an inquiry first. I gladly answer all questions so feel free...but please do not ever make an assumption about me. As I have told you [I believe], Arabic is my first lanaguage and am now reading Rumi in an Arabic translation [does not do justice to his Farsi but I have not been able to master Farsi although I took it up at the same time I attempted Patan. Maybe soon].


As for "artifically constructed states," pray tell, which state in the entire middle east is not artifically constructed? At least Israel alone among them has an actual historic precedence [nope, not even Egypt can claim as much].Actually, just about the entire globe is arttifically constructed .


As for racist and ideological drenched nonsense, I only read as muchof that as I do of work by PIJ and HAMAS [and I do read both those]. All sides deserve examination if one truly hopes to reach the truth.

Then you suggest that Pakistan was some kind of Internationally approved upon endeavour. You are aware of course that Israel was ratified by the UN after half a century of deliberation, are you not?


"Targetting of Bedua in the Negev." Israel has never done any such thing. The only thing targetted is shoddy and unliscenced construction. Were Israel to simply act as if the problem did not exist and the rook fo a communal hall caved in killing 60 kids then you and yours would among the first to scream high bloody murder and institutionalised genocide. Instead Israel merely holds Bedua to the same standard as any other Israeli citizen and mandates that they must confrom with building codes and municipal charters. Imagine the nerve of those Zionists!!!

In the very early 50s Israel set about a massive building campaign in attempt to allow [not force] the Bedua of Negev and Galilee to accept a sedentary lifestyle. Most did. Domociles were free of charge as were healthcare facilities, educational facilities, and other acrrouments of infrastructure. there are only 2 tribes that have remained at odds over this program and one of them took it upon tmeself to erect their own village, whereas one had already been built for them some 40 years prior.

Israeli Bedua do not consider themselves to be Arabs, or if they do they proclaim themselves the "True" Arabs and sedentary Arabs to be the impostors. Other than trading the two demographics have had little to do with one another. Bedua insist on serving in the military and have done so with distinction. There was even a tribe at the very southernmost tip of Gaza which insisted on being evacuated when Israel ceded Gaza because they identified more closely with Israelis than with Arabs per se.

So...all this nonsense of "ethnic cleansing" is spread about by people who haven't the faintest clue as to what dynamic exists between Bedua and the State.
 
Panda: Denigrate me all you wish but the fact remains, backed by not only indeoendant history and archaeology, but by genetic science. Jews ARE the indigenous people of that land. Who built the Temple mount? Who populated Gaza? Safed? Tiberias? Upper Galillee [although now that has been reversed by Arab migration since 48]? Like it or not, Jews have been here not 4000 years, but rather 4500 years!



However, your remarks on Pakistan are all on the mark proving that everyone can have their day.
 
Jews are one of the indigenous people of that land, Bedouin are another. Palestinians are yet another. By what human rights do Israeli govt. have to destroy a persons' home, or a whole village of homes, and make families homeless, or try to force them to live in another zone.
By what rights?

One group of Bedouin bought their land 25 years ago, their own ancestral land, and they still don't have any Govt. recognised right to build. It's a travesty of justice, and the demographer & the out-of-town planner and industry-man dictate over and above the people who live there

It's a complete travesty of justice.

(and you misrepresented what i said....i didn't say that 'antisemitism' was the only reason, it is one of the reasons however - go and read jewsonfirst.org for to see one faces of antisemitism in usa. i also said 500,000 and in parentheses i put (esp. Haredim), because some orgs are targetting whole communities, and there are 'buy a house in israel to own to rent out' fairs all over usa, which we don't get in the uk, so it's clear there is a direct attempt to target usa jews to get them to move to israel, or buy property in the settlements )
 
rachamim18 said:
Thank you for the vocabulary lesson, can we now get back to the subject of this supposed thread?

You forget how this began. You said this in reply to my assertion that the treatment of the Bedouin in the Negev was racist.

Nino: Israel is racist....hmmmm....Semite hating Semite is it Nino? Please expound on this. Quite fascinating. You surely realise how asinine you sound accusing one Semitic group of being racist towards another, yes?

I said this policy was racist, regardless of them being 'fellow Semites'. This is an act of brutality that is being perpetrated against a specific minority ethnic group by a dominant ethnic group. Therefore, it is racism and it bears all the hallmarks of racism.

Stop dissembling.
 
Tangent: Calm down. Breathe. Think. In your hometown, what would happen if someone were to decide to erect a home without any kind of municipal oversight, permitting, etc? From a man whose spent his life building, unpermitted buildings are a danger to all.



The Bedua you refer to in the 25 year bid, would they by chance be up near Galilee? If so, I can easily explain it to you. If not, let me know where exaqctly.



Yes, they are doing selling in the US, it is covered in the press here. Saw video of one in Teaneck, NJ where all the usual LEFTISTS came out with Jews are Murderers teeshirts, very classy. It is not so much as targetting American Jews as it is Jews in concentrated areas, which the UK may or may not have, and Jews with the necessary disposable income as the homes are being touted as investment opportunities for other Jews to live in, not for the buyers to move to [which is soemthing else you might have missed].
 
You're just a flak machine; spewing the usual right wing bile about so-called "Leftists" (a sort of homogenised group of people in your eyes, evidentally).

What's happening in the Negev is racist and can be considered ethnic cleansing. Then again, that's how much of the country was formed - non?
 
So, requiring municipal charters and building permitsis a racist move, especially when said demographic already was given a brand new village to live in? Explain please. PS: Does the UK require building permits and charters?
 
rachamim18 said:
Yes, they are doing selling in the US, it is covered in the press here. Saw video of one in Teaneck, NJ where all the usual LEFTISTS came out with Jews are Murderers teeshirts, very classy. It is not so much as targetting American Jews as it is Jews in concentrated areas, which the UK may or may not have, and Jews with the necessary disposable income as the homes are being touted as investment opportunities for other Jews to live in, not for the buyers to move to [which is soemthing else you might have missed].

Nothing like a bit of scaremongering. This video sounds interesting, though I suspect it was produced by a persons or group of people with a particular ideological bent.

To hear you talk, you'd think Jews were a homogenous group of people...like black people being 'all the same' or some such nonsense.
 
rachamim18 said:
So, requiring municipal charters and building permitsis a racist move, especially when said demographic already was given a brand new village to live in? Explain please. PS: Does the UK require building permits and charters?

They own the land that they live on. I guess you missed that bit - huh?

How clever to use building regs and other forms of legalese to legitimise and rationalise the enforced removal of a people from their land.

What were saying about the American Indians now?
 
rachamim18 said:
Tangent: Calm down. Breathe. Think. In your hometown, what would happen if someone were to decide to erect a home without any kind of municipal oversight, permitting, etc? From a man whose spent his life building, unpermitted buildings are a danger to all.
I am thinking. I am breathing. The old inhabitants need honouring, not shunting. the current methodology is unacceptable culturally, and realistically. one cannot make families homeless in this way. one goes and offers real assistance, by negotiation, preferably in same place as before, or right next to. one does not crush, then shunt. it is cruel. there is no need to be cruel. and anyway. planning permission is a new invention, and these are old peoples. simply the new boy on the bloc is flexing his muscle in a way which doesn't respect tradition. so you don't think the houses are safe? then isn't it better to have a house, than no house? better to have a family housed, than a homeless family. heartless rules. stop excusing them.
The Bedua you refer to in the 25 year bid, would they by chance be up near Galilee? If so, I can easily explain it to you. If not, let me know where exaqctly.
No. In Negev. 30 adults, 63 children: http://www.icahd.org/eng/news.asp?menu=5&submenu=1&item=408
Yes, they are doing selling in the US, it is covered in the press here. Saw video of one in Teaneck, NJ where all the usual LEFTISTS came out with Jews are Murderers teeshirts, very classy.
That's really offensive. If these shirts said Muslims are murders, it would be equally sick. All humans are capable of being murderers, Jews are no exception.
It is not so much as targetting American Jews as it is Jews in concentrated areas, which the UK may or may not have, and Jews with the necessary disposable income as the homes are being touted as investment opportunities for other Jews to live in, not for the buyers to move to [which is soemthing else you might have missed].
We don't have that many Jews here, around 350,000 official, and I think there may be more, but they're probably defining themselves as Jedi, or something :~|
 
rachamim18 said:
So, requiring municipal charters and building permitsis a racist move, especially when said demographic already was given a brand new village to live in? Explain please. PS: Does the UK require building permits and charters?
Yes, you know that already however UK is established as an adminstration for more than 60 years, and it doesn't try to adminster over property built outside it's legal territory any more.
 
tangentlama said:
thanks for those adds to my perceptions, alderbaran, violentpanda.
violentpanda, i thought both pakistan and israel's 'creation' were mandated by the UN in 1947 ?
( i don't want to sidetrack the conversation for too long, because i see no-one corrected the raphael lemkin statement!)
Pakistan's mandate was fulfilled, even though it was (very sadly) poorly executed, Israel's technically wasn't as the '47 mandate was the 55%-45% split that wasn't accepted, and caused increased strife between the two parties to the mandate, leading to the unilateral declaration of independence (IIRC UN membership came about a year later, rather than straight away as had happened with Pakistan).
 
rachamim18 said:
Panda: Denigrate me all you wish but the fact remains, backed by not only indeoendant history and archaeology, but by genetic science. Jews ARE the indigenous people of that land. Who built the Temple mount? Who populated Gaza? Safed? Tiberias? Upper Galillee [although now that has been reversed by Arab migration since 48]? Like it or not, Jews have been here not 4000 years, but rather 4500 years!
Mmmm, Jews, eh?
Are you sure you don't mean proto-Semites and Semites?


However, your remarks on Pakistan are all on the mark proving that everyone can have their day.
Don't patronise me, Zionist.
 
More Negev ethnic cleansing;

ILA destroys Bedouin homes to make way for Jewish town

By Mijal Grinberg, Haaretz Correspondent


The Israel Land Administration (ILA), with the assistance of an unusually large police force and IDF soldiers, demolished dozens of tin shack homes Monday in unrecognized Bedouin villages Um Al-Hiran and A-Tir in the northern Negev.

The ILA is destroying the village and evacuating the inhabitants so that a Jewish Community named "Hiran" can be established in the area. Fourteen shacks, which housed some 100 people, have been destroyed by bulldozers so far.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/874814.html
 
Yeah. That's nationalist Zionism

bothgunmen.jpg
 
Spion said:
I don't get you. All Zionism is nationalism in my book - ie, belief in a jewish nation state
there's zionism which isn't based in right wing polices and zionism which is national zionism which moono reffers is ofcourse the ight wing flavour...
 
I also like to believe that there's a social Zionism, distinct from nationalist Zionism, which focuses on the spiritual and humanitarian aspects of Judaism, instead of using Judaism as a shield for corruption.

'Zion' , for social Zionists, is a spritual attainment. Or so I like to believe.
 
moono said:
I also like to believe that there's a social Zionism, distinct from nationalist Zionism, which focuses on the spiritual and humanitarian aspects of Judaism, instead of using Judaism as a shield for corruption.

'Zion' , for social Zionists, is a spritual attainment. Or so I like to believe.
but whether it's left or right wing in its leaning it's all nationalist, in that it is the belief in the need for a jewish nation state

Edited to add: I've never come across a Zionist who only has a spiritual attachment. They're just called (non-zionist) jews, aren't they?
 
Spion said:
but whether it's left or right wing in its leaning it's all nationalist, in that it is the belief in the need for a jewish nation state

Edited to add: I've never come across a Zionist who only has a spiritual attachment. They're just called (non-zionist) jews, aren't they?
Well with respect then you don't know many jewish people i know hundreds if not more who'd say that zion can only come after the second coming as is predicted in the tora...
 
Spion said:
I don't get you. All Zionism is nationalism in my book - ie, belief in a jewish nation state

Nah. For some Jews it's more tied into religion and myth, rather than to a geo-political entity.

Also, nationalist Zionism is a species of Zionism, and not the same as, for example socialist or collectivist Zionism, which are more about being where they are, rather than controlling a nation-state.

I've explained it very poorly, but suffice to say that not all species of Zionism are to do with belief in or the instatement of a "Jewish nation-state".
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
Well with respect then you don't know many jewish people i know hundreds if not more who'd say that zion can only come after the second coming as is predicted in the tora...
I'd call them Jews. Whether they were Zionists or not would depend on their attitude to forming/maintaining a state in the here and now. I'd pretty much go along with this definition of Zionism - http://www.mideastweb.org/zionism.htm
 
ViolentPanda said:
but suffice to say that not all species of Zionism are to do with belief in or the instatement of a "Jewish nation-state".
Then I don't understand why they are Zionists, and not just jews
 
but whether it's left or right wing in its leaning it's all nationalist, in that it is the belief in the need for a jewish nation state

'Zion', I think, in the 'Promised Land' sense isn't necessarily physical space.

That's my outsider's understanding. Some of the jewish guys may or may not agree.


Anyway, I try to distinguish between Zionists and Zionist arseholes. Lol. Whichever, 'Zionism' is an abstract.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Nah. For some Jews it's more tied into religion and myth, rather than to a geo-political entity.

Also, nationalist Zionism is a species of Zionism, and not the same as, for example socialist or collectivist Zionism, which are more about being where they are, rather than controlling a nation-state.

I've explained it very poorly, but suffice to say that not all species of Zionism are to do with belief in or the instatement of a "Jewish nation-state".
though national zionism has in effect done a massive and well formed job of creating the myth that there is only one form of zionism and it's about a nation state...
 
Back
Top Bottom