grosun said:that i would like to see.
simon cowells face when they do "fuck the macarana"
i would say prodigy but i don't know a lot about dance music.
even so... tiesto? i wouldnt really say he was innovative
grosun said:that i would like to see.
Hmm possibly though I would argue that watering down a sound to make it more palatable to the masses is not what I would call innovative. What you call 'one-off club tracks' are my bread and butter - it's these tracks that were innovative not albums. Albums are an irrelevance in dance music anyway.erasmus said:I dunno, they were one of the first dance acts to actually make decent albums, as opposed to one off club/rave tracks that were boring unless you were on e. The crucial thing was Orbital made some of the first non-ambient credible dance albums (unlike say selected ambient works 1). And they more 'played' the synths live more than others, who just fucked around with sequencers and dats. Belfast was release around 1990 i think, and that still sounds fresh today, and was nothing like anything else at the time. I just think their productions had a sophistication (not in a pretentious way, just they sounded more polished) that many others didn't.
Ninjaboy said:definetely agree with John B, but he seriously fell off imo.
=Albums are an irrelevance in dance music anyway.
.erasmus said:Well, before Orbital came along, maybe.
To mixes of 12"s!erasmus said:You don't dance around your living room??
Trying to forget about themGmarthews said:Anyone remember Lab 4??
milesy said:nah, john b is cool. i love the way he is still big in the drumnbass world but looks completely out of place, and doesn't just stick to drum n bass in his sets - he has 80s stuff, electro, new wave, indie...

