Very strange current anti-intellectualism running in parts of this thread...anyway, raiders is my favourite because it just has the right feel; it's got jokes and humour but also has this dark thing to it. Temple just felt too much like a sequel and Crusade was almost a parody of an Indy film...
Anyone ever watch the TV series? A few good episodes in that from what I remember.
Billowing stars-n-stripes cut = automatic fail.
![]()

I chose to ignore that bit. Hopefully it's just part of the dodgy trailer and won't be in the film.
How old is Harrison Ford? A bit too old to go around leaping from moving vehicles anyhow![]()
...but then you thought The Fifth Element was better than Blade Runner (..and I'll never let you forget it)
It's very close between Raiders and Last Crusade. But Last Crusade just wins it because it has the better humour.
Temple of Doom, on the other hand, was crap. Don't know what happened there...
I thought the nazi flags were part of the retrospective over the previous three films? Just watched the trailer again, really not expecting much from this film...




Temple of doom is my favourite one. There, I said it. Now all the people who want to come and tell me I'm an idiot because of this or that wanky artistic criticism can do so. But these films weren't ever meant to be high art were they? As far as I could ever tell, they were made for kids anyway..
As is often the case with movies, first is best.
Nah, 2 is more often the best in any trilogy


Hmmm... Empire Strikes Back? Superman 2? X Men 2? Godfather 2? The Two Towers? Back to the Future 2? Very often the second film is where the trilogy is at its peak before shooting downhill in the third...
I watched The Fifth Element years before I came to China.
And I NEVER watch anything dubbed. I absolutely loathe dubbing.![]()

Apparently the story about him getting slashed by the creature in order to justify the scars on his face is an urban myth.Empire Strikes Back is a disorganized mess. It's also the one where Mark Hamill reappears after his plastic surgery, and his face has now become frozen.
I liked the tv series a lot, without skimping on the action they managed to stick in loads of historical detail that isn't found in schoolbooks. It reminded me of Charleys War.It was largely crap though iirc
I liked the tv series a lot, without skimping on the action they managed to stick in loads of historical detail that isn't found in schoolbooks. It reminded me of Charleys War.
Apparently the story about him getting slashed by the creature in order to justify the scars on his face is an urban myth.
I have to say I never noticed that much of a difference about his face between ep IV and the others.
As for the film itself I've always found it the most significant and powerful of the original trilogy, even if it lacks the epic climatic battle of the other two.
Your beef is unacceptable quite frankly.that was my beef with it. I started watching it repeated when I was 13 and was slightly annoyed with the edumacational aspect.
That and it cemented my hatred for that type of camerawork/focus (or whatever it was) It ruins Deadwood for me.
Your beef is unacceptable quite frankly.
Some wizards and dinosaurs would not have gone amiss I grant you.it came across as twee and earnest at its worst. Worse crime, it was telling me things I already knew in a heavy handed manner. No wonder I turned to scanners/dune/terminator/predator and such other eighties gold

